The idea of incorporating and applying interdisciplinary concepts is an important objective in electrical and computer engineering education. In this sense, mobile robot platforms can be used as educational tools to promote and integrate different curriculum subjects. In this paper, the programme and experience of an optional course called Applied Mobile Robotics is outlined. The reported content is specially focused on the experiences of applying control theory to a mobile robot platform.
PackD. J.AvanzatoR.AhlgrenJ. and VernerI. M., ‘Fire-fighting mobile robotics and interdisciplinary design — Comparative perspectives’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 47 (2004), 369–376.
6.
PaulikM. J. and KrishnanM., ‘A Competition- Motivation Capstone Design Course: The Result of a Fifteen-Year Evolution’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 44 (2001), 67–75.
7.
WilczynskiV. and FlowersW., ‘FIRST Robotics Competition: University curriculum applications of mobile robots’, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 22(4) (2006), 792–803.
8.
ValeraA.WeissM.VallesM. and DiezL. J., ‘Control of mobile robots using mobile technologies’, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 23(3) (2007), 491–498.
9.
KarpT.GaleR.LoweL. A.MedinaV. and BeutlichE., ‘Generation NXT: Building young engineers with LEGOs’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 53 (2010), 80–86.
10.
de GabrielGómez J. M.MandowA.Fernández-LozanoJ. and García-CerezoA., ‘Using Lego NXT mobile robots with LabVIEW for undergraduate courses on mechatronics’, IEEE Trans. Educ., 54 (2011), 41–47.
11.
European Commission, Higher Education in Europe, inside the police areas of European Commission (19 April 2012), Available at http://ec.europa.eu/education/index_en.htm.
12.
European Parliament Council, ‘Recommendation of the European Parliament Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualification Framework for lifelong learning’, Official Journal of the European Union (6 May 2008).
13.
PachecoL.LuoN.FerrerI. and CufíX., ‘Interdisciplinary knowledge integration through an applied mobile robotics course’, Int. J. Eng. Educ., 25 (2009), 830–840.
14.
LjungL., System Identification: Theory for the User (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989).
15.
KuoC., Automatic Control Systems (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996).
16.
AströmK. J. and WittenmarkB., Computer Controlled Systems: Theory and Design (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988).
17.
LavalleS. M., Planning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011), Available at http://planning.cs.uiuc.edu.
18.
MaCiejowskiJ. M., Predictive Control with Constraints (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2002).
19.
ReedsJ. A. and SheppL. A., ‘Optimal paths for a car that goes forwards and backwards’, Pacific J. Math., 145(2) (1990), 367–393.
20.
DubinsL. E., ‘On curves of minimal length with a constraint on average curvature, and with prescribed initial and terminal positions and tangents’, Am. J. Math., 79 (1957), 497–516.
21.
PachecoL. and LuoN., ‘Mobile robot local trajectory tracking with dynamic model predictive control techniques’, Int. J. Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 7 (2011), 3457–3483.
22.
BoxG. E. P.HunterJ. S. and HunterW. G., ‘Statistics for Experimenters’, in BaldingD. J. (Eds), Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005).
