Smartphones combine the flexibility of MP3 recorders and the connectivity of a PC in a discrete handheld device, thereby suggesting their application as a user friendly tool for giving recorded audio feedback efficiently. This paper describes a smartphone feedback methodology and presents findings from research on its use with 130 Level 5 (2nd year of degree study) Engineering and Computing students. The study found that the smartphone was more suitable than other technologies to the various demands of feedback production and distribution, and that this helped the tutor to manage the exceptionally stressful time associated with marking and giving feedback on top of an ongoing teaching load. Its pedagogic integration also resulted in a good dialogical experience as evidenced through student testimony.
RotheramB., ‘Sounds good: Quicker, better assessment using audio feedback?’ paper presented at Assessment SIG: Working with students to enhance feedback, The Higher Education Academy, York, 25 March 2010.
IceP.CurtisR.PhillipsP.WellsJ., ‘Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and students' sense of community’, J. Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2) (2007), 3–25.
4.
NortcliffeA.MiddletonA., ‘Effective assignment feedback through timely and personal digital audio engagement’, in O'DonoghueJohn (Ed.), Technology-Supported Environments for Personalized Learning: Methods and Case Studies (IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2009).
5.
JohansonR., ‘Rethinking the red ink: Audio-feedback in the ESL writing classroom’, Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 4(1) (1999), 31–38.
6.
CrokerK., ‘Giving Feedback via audio files’, presented at HEA Assessment Special Interest Group, 5th June 2008 Meeting (York, UK, 2008).
ParkY.ChenJ. V., ‘Acceptance and adoption of the innovative use of smartphone’, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 107(9) (2007), 1349–136.
10.
CochraneT.BatemanR., ‘Smartphones give you wins: Pedagogical affordances of mobile Web 2.0’, Australasian J. Educ. Technol., 26(1) (2010), 1–14.
11.
KimS. H., ‘Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals’, Information and Management, 45(6) (2008), 387–393.
12.
ChenJ.ParkY.PutzerG. J., ‘An examination of the components that increase acceptance of Smartphones among healthcare professionals’, Electronic J. Health Informatics, 5(2) (2010), e16.
13.
NortcliffeA., ‘Project supervision for ‘Generation Y’ students and a ‘Generation X’ academic: A case study of how iPhones can revolutionise project supervision’, presented at ASSET Media Enhanced Learning Special Interest Group (MEL SIG); Media-Enhanced Feedback: A workshop to explore how digital media can be used for giving students feedback, 27 October 2010, Sheffield, UK.
14.
RotheramB., ‘Using an MP3 recorder to give feedback on student assignments’, Educational Developments, 8(2) (2007), 7–10.
15.
NortcliffeA.FeatherstoneS.GarrickR.SwiftG., ‘Supplemental instruction a higher level learning?’ in AungW.HoffmannM. W. H.JernN. W.KingR. W.RuizL. M. S. (Eds), Engineering Education and Research – 2002: A Chronicle of Worldwide Innovations (International Network for Engineering Education and Research, USA, 2003), pp. 30.
16.
NicolD. J.Macfarlane-DickD., ‘Rethinking formative assessment in HE: A theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice’Higher Education Academy, 2004, www.heacademy.ac.uk/assessment/ASS051D_SENLEF_model.doc, accessed 27 December 2010.
17.
NicolD. J.Macfarlane-DickD., ‘Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice’, Studies in Higher Education, 31(2) (2006), 199–218.
18.
NicolD., ‘From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5) (2010), 501–517.
19.
LyonsH.ThorpeL., ‘The Diary-Interview Approach: Exploring student experiences of e-learning’. in RustC. (Ed.) Proc. 16th Symp. Improving Student Learning: Through the Curriculum, 1–3 Sept. 2008, University of Durham, UK.
20.
GibbsG.SimpsonC., ‘Measuring the response of students to assessment: The assessment experience questionnaire’, in Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Improving Students Learning: Theory, Research and Scholarship, Hinckley, UK, 2003 (Alden Press, Oxford, UK, 2003).
21.
NicolD., ‘Assessment as a driver for transformational change in HE’, HEA Education Subject Centre advanced learning and teaching in education (ESCalate) Newsletter 10. Retrieved October 14, 2008, (2008) http://escalate.ac.uk/4451, accessed 27 December 2010.
22.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK., Research Methods in Education, 5th edn (Routledge and Falmer, London and New York, 2000).
23.
MiddletonA.NortcliffeA., ‘Understanding effective models of audio feedback’ in RoyRajarshi (Ed.), Engineering Education Perspectives, Issues and Concerns (Shipra Publications, India, 2009).
24.
WantR., ‘iPhone: Smarter than the average phone’, Pervasive Computing, 9(3) (2010), 6–9.
