This paper makes two main contributions: first it argues the case for a more proactive investigation into the potential of technology for enhancing the learning and teaching environment and secondly gives a number of examples with supporting student evaluations. The key contribution is to show several examples of how a little imagination and reflection on what and how to use technology can enable significant gains in the quality of student learning at relatively low cost in time, effort and expense to academic staff.
KhanA.VlacicL., ‘Teaching control: Benefits of animated tutorials from viewpoint of control students’, in Proc. 7th IFAC Symposium on Advances in Control Education, Madrid, 21 June 2006.
3.
HEA, The Higher Education Academy Evidence Based Practice Assessment & Feedback Seminar Series2010, available at http://www.heacademy.ac.uk, accessed 15 July 2011.
4.
YorkeM.LongdenB., The First-year Experience in Higher Education in the UK (The Higher Education Academy, York, 2007).
5.
RossiterJ. A.GrayL.RainaA.MorleyM.DesforgesL., ‘Making the Most of Intro Week’, in ArlettC.DalesR. (Eds), Proc. EE2008 (International Conference on Innovation, Good Practice and Research in Engineering Education, 14–16 July, Loughborough, UK, available at http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/scholarart/ee2008/p054-rossiter.pdf
6.
RossiterJ. A.GrayL., ‘Curriculum design for learning in a systems engineering department’, in Proc. Fourth International Blended Learning Conference, ‘Engaging Students in the Curriculum’, 17–18 June 2009, University of Hertfordshire.
7.
RussellM., ‘Using an electronic voting system to enhance learning and teaching’, Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, 3(2) (2008), 58–65.
8.
OrsmondP., ‘Self and peer assessment in the biosciences’, in Teaching Biosciences. enhancing learning series (HEA BioScience Subject Centre, Leeds, UK, 2004).
PorterP., ‘Using two- and three-dimensional graphical animations in powerpoint’, in Proc. Fourth International Blended Learning Conference, ‘Engaging Students in the Curriculum’, University of Hertfordshire, 17–18 June, 2009.
17.
RossiterJ. A.RossiterD., ‘A blended module design to engage new students’, in Proc. Second International Blended Learning Conference, University of Hertfordshire, 2007.
18.
NortcliffeA. L.MiddletonA., ‘Understanding effective models of audio feedback’ in RoyRajarshi (Ed.), Engineering Education Perspectives, Issues and Concerns (Shipra Publications, India, 2009).
19.
WilliamsJ.FardonM., ‘On-demand internet-transmitted lecture recordings: Attempting to enhance and support the lecture experience’, in Proc. ALT-C 2005: Exploring the frontiers of e-learning - borders, outposts and migration, Manchester, 6–8 September, 2005.
20.
RussellP.MattickK., ‘Does streaming of a lecture result in empty seats?’ in Proc. ALT-C 2005: Exploring the frontiers of e-learning - borders, outposts and migration, Manchester, 6–8 September, 2005.
21.
RossiterJ. A.NortcliffeA.GriffinA.MiddletonA., ‘Using student generated audio to enhance learning’, Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, 4(2) (2009), 52–61.
22.
PearceD., HEA Engineering Subject Centre teaching award for Impact of Animated Visual Models in Enhancing Student Understanding of Complex Processes (2008), available at http://www.engsc.ac.uk/teaching-award/2008, accessed 17 July 2011.
23.
GuzmanJ. L.AstromK. J.DormidoS.HagglundT.PiguetY., ‘Interactive learning modules for PID control’, in Proc. Symp. ACE, 2006.
Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre4(2) (2009) Special issue on Learning technologies in engineering education.
