The aim of the study is to identify similarities in the learning needs of students who benefit from the use of remote laboratories, interconnected in a network comprising five European universities. The needs analysis is subordinated to the subsequent development of learning situations which should be appropriate for the users, exploiting the common elements. Even though the sub-samples belong to universities with various cultural peculiarities, there are statistically significant differences and there are numerous similarities as to the students' needs and preferences, a fact that favours the use of common learning scenarios and tools.
Strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (‘ET 2020’) Policy framework; Implementation; Programme supporting ‘Education & Training 2010’ and lifelong learning.
4.
CarréPh.CasparP., Traité des Sciences et des Techniques de la Formation (Dunod, Paris, 2004).
5.
Cheng-ChihWuLeeG. C., ‘Use of computer-mediated communication in a teaching practicum course’, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., 2 (2004), 511–528.
6.
CrosierJ. K.CobbS. V. G.WilsonJ. R., ‘Experimental comparison of virtual reality with traditional teaching methods for teaching radioactivity’, Education and Information Technologies, 5(4) (2000), 329–343.
7.
Hsiao-LinTuanChi-ChinChinChi-ChungTsaiSu-FeyCheng, ‘Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students’, Int. J. Sci. Maths Educ., 3 (2005), 541–566.
EdwardsP. A., ‘Impact of technology on the content and nature of teaching and learning’, Nursing Education Perspectives, November/December 26(6) (2005), 344–347.
10.
TretinG.ScimecaS., ‘The roles of tutors and experts in designing online education courses’, Distance Education, 20(1) (1999), 144–16.
11.
GooJ. J.ParkK. S.LeeM.ParkJ.HahnM.AhH.PicardR., ‘Effects of guided and unguided learning style on user attention in Zhigeng Pan’, in AylettRuthDienerHolgerJinXiaogangGabelStefanLiLi (Eds), Proc. Virtual Environment In Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment: First International Conference, Edutainment, Hangzhou, China, 16–19 April, 2006.
12.
HarperK. C.ChenK.YenD. C., ‘Distance learning, virtual classrooms, and teaching pedagogy in the Internet environment’, Technology in Society, 26 (2004), 585–598.
13.
WickleinR. C.SchellJ. W., ‘Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science, and technology education’, J. Technology Education, 6(2) (1995), 59–76.
14.
WagnerE. D., ‘Variables affecting distance educational program success’, Educational Technology, 33 (1993), 28–32.
15.
AudetM.LepinayS., ‘L'acte d'apprendre: Passion ou obligation. A l'ère de nouvelle économie de nouveaux besoin en formation èmergente’, Rvue CEFRIO, 1(2) (1999).
16.
MarchandL.LoisierJ.BernatchezP. A., Guide des pratiques d'apprentissage en ligne. Document préparé pour REFAD, Montreal, 2002.
17.
ReedPh. A., Learning Style and Laboratory Preference: A Study of Middle School Technology Education Teachers in Virginia, J. Technol. Educ., 13(1) (2001), 59–71.
18.
JavidiG., Virtual Reality and Education (University of South Florida, 1999).
19.
Kian-SamHongKwok-WingLaiHoltonDerek, ‘Students' satisfaction and perceived learning with a web-based course’, Educational Technology & Society, 6(1) (2003), 16–124.
20.
MelearC. T., ‘Cognitive process analysis of test questions in a computer managed college biology course based on a learning style assessment with emphasis on analytic-spatial skill’, presented at Annual Meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA, 8–11 April, 1990.
21.
Arden-CloseCh., ‘Conflict of learning styles: University science lectures in the Sultanate of Oman’, J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 8(4) (1999), 323–332.
22.
ArhimA. O.Johnson-MallardV., ‘Encouraging alternative forms of self expression in the generation Y student: A strategy for effective learning in the classroom’, ABNF J., November/December (2003), 121–122.
23.
McKennaP., ‘Programmers: Concrete women and abstract men?’J. Computer Assisted Learning, 17 (2001), 386–395.
24.
RichardsonJ. C.SwanK., ‘Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction’, J. Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1) (2003), 68–88.
25.
SwanK.SheaP.FredericksonP.PickettA.PelzW.MahenG., Building Knowledge Building Communities: Consistency, contact and community in the virtual classroom (SUNY Learning Network, Albany, NY, 2000).
26.
TobinsK., ‘Qualititative perceptions of learning environments on the World Wide Web’, in FraserB. J.TobinsK. G. (Eds), International Handbook of Science Education (Kluwer, London and Dordrecht, 1998), pp. 581–594.
27.
WitkinB. R., Assessing Needs in Educational and Social Programs (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1984).
28.
WitkinB. R.AltschuldJ. W., Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A practical guide (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995).
29.
KaufmanR., ‘Obtaining functional results: Relating needs assessment needs analysis, and objectives’, Educational Technology, January (1986), 24–27.
30.
VoithoferR., Supporting Digital Portfolios in the K-12 Classroom: Policies, Assessments, Training, Technology (Macromedia, San Francisco, 2003).
31.
CarswellL., ‘Distance education via the internet: The student experience’, Br. J. Educ. Technol., 31(1) (2000), 29–46.
32.
CollinsM., ‘Comparing web, correspondence and lecture versions of a second-year non-major biology course’, Br. J. Educ. Technol., 31(1) (2000), 21–27.
33.
SandholtzJ. H.DwyerD. C.RingstaffC., Teaching with Technology: Creating Student-Centered Classrooms (Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1997).
