This paper discusses the quality assessment of final-year BSc Engineering Honours projects within the School of Engineering, Science and Design at Glasgow Caledonian University. The issues of objectives and outcomes, assessment instruments and tools, marking criteria, methods of good practice, honours classifications, awarding creativity and innovation, and addressing plagiarism are all discussed.
Engineering Subject Benchmark Statements (QAA for Higher Education, London, 2000).
2.
HoughtonW., ‘Application in a general engineering department offering MEng, BEng and BSc programmes’, LTSN Engineering Guide, Interpreting and Using the Engineering Benchmark Statement (LTSN, Loughborough, 2002).
3.
DoddridgeM., ‘Engineering programme design and specification — Interpreting and using the Engineering Benchmark information’, LTSN Engineering Guide, Interpreting and Using the Engineering Benchmark Statement (LTSN, Loughborough, 2002).
4.
ScallonP., ‘A basic model for developing learning outcomes from QAA Engineering Benchmark Statements’, LTSN Engineering Guide, Interpreting and Using the Engineering Benchmark Statement (LTSN, Loughborough, 2002).
5.
ProudfootJ. T., ‘Relating to the engineering benchmark statements’, LTSN Engineering Guide, Interpreting and Using the Engineering Benchmark Statement (LTSN, Loughborough, 2002).
6.
BrownG., Assessment: A Guide for Lecturers (LTSN Generic Centre, Loughborough, 2001).
7.
A Guide to Learning Engineering Through Projects (PBLE, University of Nottingham, 2003).
