Student approaches to learning (SAL) and the levels of understanding they achieve are critically linked and closely related to motivation. This paper reports the results of a study involving first year higher education engineering students using the ASI-32 questionnaire to investigate approaches to study and end of year achievement.
DörnyeZ., ‘Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70 (2000), 519–538.
2.
JacobsP. A. and NewsteadS., ‘The nature and development of student motivation’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70 (2000), 243–254.
3.
BiggsJ., Student Approaches to Learning and Studying (Australian Council for Educational Research, Hawthorn, Victoria, 1987).
4.
RichardsonJ. T. E., ‘Using questionnaires to evaluate student learning: Some health warnings’ in GibbsG. (ed.), Improving Student Learning — Theory and Practice. (Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford, 1994), also available at www.lgu.ac.uk/deliberations/ocsd-pubs/isltprichardson.html, accessed on 18/1/01.
5.
EntwistleN. J. and EntwistleD., ‘The relationship between personality, study methods and academic performance’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40 (1970), 132–143.
6.
RichardsonJ. T. E., Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-based and Distance Learning, (SHRE and Open University Press, Buckingham, 2000).
7.
RamsdenP. and EntwistleN., ‘Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51 (1981), 368–383.
8.
EntwistleN. and RamsdenP., Understanding Student Learning, (Croom Helm, London, 1983), pp. 35–55.
9.
RichardsonJ. T. E., ‘Reliability and replicability of the approaches to studying questionnaire’, Studies in Higher Education, 15 (1990), 155–168.
10.
RamsdenP., ‘Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective’, Studies in Higher Education, 14 (2) (1987), 157–158.
11.
BiggsJ., ‘What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63 (1993), 3–19.
12.
RoweJ. W. K. and HarrisB., ‘A theory based modification of the engineering tutorial’, European Journal of Engineering Education, 25 (3) (2000), 235–242.
13.
Aristotle, ‘Nicomachean Ethics’, (c.340 BC), in McKeonR. (ed.), The Basic Works of Aristotle (Random House New York, 1941), pp. 1029–1030, EN Bk. VI, Ch. 8, 1142.
14.
RamsdenP., ‘The context of learning in academic departments’ in MartonF.HounsellD. and EntwistleN. (eds.), The Experience of Learning, 2nd edn (Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press, 1997).
15.
NewmanJ. H., On the Scope and Nature of University Education, (London, Dent, 1825, 1915edn reprinted 1965).
16.
MartonF., ‘Symposium: Learning Processes and Strategies — I, Editorial Introduction, The verb ‘to learn’ takes the accusative’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, (1976), 1–3.
17.
MartonF. and SäljöR., ‘On qualitative differences in learning I, Outcome and process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (1976), 4–11.
18.
MartonF., ‘On non-verbatim learning 1. Level of processing and level of outcome’, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16 (1975), 273–279.
19.
MartonF. and WenestamC. G., ‘Qualitative differences in the understanding and retention of the main points in some texts based on the principle-example structure’ in GrunebergM. M.MorrisP. E. and SykesR. N. (eds), Practical Aspects of Memory, (Academic Press, London, 1978).
20.
MartonF. and SäljöR., ‘On qualitative differences in learning II, Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46 (1976), 115–127.
21.
SvennsonL., ‘On qualitative differences in learning III, study skill and learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47 (1977), 233–243.
22.
SäljöR., ‘Learning from reading’, in MartonF.HounsellD. and EntwistleN. (eds), The Experience of Learning (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, 1984).
MartonF. and SäljöR., ‘The experience of learning’, in MartonF.HounsellD. and EntwistleN. (eds), Approaches To Learning (Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh,1984), pp. 36–55.
25.
SäljöR., ‘Learning in the learners perspective I — Some commonsense conceptions’, (University of Gothenburg, Reports from the Institute of Education, Gothenburg, 77, 1979).
26.
van RossumE. and SchenkS., ‘The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52 (1984), 73–83.
27.
MartonF.Dall'AlbaG. and BeatyE., ‘Conceptions of learning’, International Journal of Educational Research, 19 (1993), 277–300.
28.
MarshallD.SummersM. and WoolnoughB., ‘Student's conceptions of learning in an engineering context’, Higher education, 38 (1999), 291–309.
EllisonG., The Future of First Degree Courses in Engineering (Proposals of the Engineering Professors' Working Party, UK, 1990).
31.
KemberD.JamiesonQ. W.PomfretM. and WongE. T. T., ‘Learning approaches, study time and academic performance’, Higher Education, 29 (1995), 329–343.
32.
GibbsG., ‘Improving the quality of student learning through course design’, in BarnettR. (ed.), Learning To Effect (SRHE and Open University Press, Buckingham, 1992).
33.
BaillieC., ‘Addressing first-year issues in engineering education’, European Journal of Engineering Education, 23 (4) (1998), 453–465.
34.
McLeanM., ‘Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement?’, Teaching in Higher Education, 6 (3) (2001), 399–414.
