A novel induction motor model, that fully accounts for both the fundamental iron loss and main flux saturation, is derived. The model is then applied to the design of a modified rotor flux oriented control scheme. A rotor flux estimator and a rotor resistance identifier are both developed using the novel model, so that simultaneous compensation of main flux saturation, iron loss and rotor resistance variation is achieved.
De MelloF. P. and WalshG. W., ‘Reclosing transients in induction motors with terminal capacitors’, AIEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., 80 (1961), 1206–1213.
2.
BrownJ. E.KovacsK. P. and VasP., ‘A method of including the effects of main flux path saturation in the generalized equations of AC machines’, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., 102(1) (1983), 96–103.
3.
HeY. K. and LipoT. A., ‘Computer simulation of an induction machine with spatially dependent saturation’, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., 103(4) (1984), 707–714.
4.
LeviE., ‘A unified approach to main flux saturation modelling in d—q axis models of induction machines’, IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, 10(3) (1995), 455–461.
5.
WilliamsonS. and HealeyR. C., ‘Space vector representation of advanced motor models for vector controlled induction motors’, IEE Proc. — Electr. Power. Appl., 143(1) (1996), 69–77.
6.
LeviE. and VuckovicV., ‘Field-oriented control of induction machines in the presence of magnetic saturation’, Electric Machines Power Syst., 16(2) (1989), 133–147.
7.
LeviE., ‘Impact of iron loss on behaviour of vector controlled induction machines’, IEEE Trans. Industry Appl., 31(6) (1995), 1287–1296.
8.
LeviE.SokolaM.BogliettiA. and PastorelliM., ‘Iron loss in rotor flux oriented induction machines: Identification, assessment of detuning and compensation’, IEEE Trans. Power Electronics., 11(5) (1996), 698–709.
9.
BoldeaI. and NasarS. A., ‘Unified treatment of core losses and saturation in the orthogonal-axis model of electrical machines’, IEE Proc. B., 134(6) (1987), 355–363.
10.
SokolaM., 'Vector control of induction machines using improved machine models, PhD Thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool (1998).
11.
KrishnanR. and BharadwajA. S., ‘A review of parameter sensitivity and adaptation in indirect vector controlled induction motor drive systems’, IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, 6(4) (1991), 695–704.
12.
GarcésL. J., ‘Parameter adaptation for the speed-controlled static AC drive with a squirrel-cage induction motor’, IEEE Trans. Industry Appl., IA-16(2) (1980), 173–178.
13.
RowanT. M.KerkmanR. J. and LeggateD., ‘A simple on-line adaptation for indirect field orientation of an induction machine’, IEEE Trans. Industry Appl., IA-27(4) (1991), 720–727.
14.
KrishnanR. and PillayP., ‘Sensitivity analysis and comparison of parameter compensation schemes in vector controlled induction motor drives’, Conf. Rec. of 1986 IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, 1986, pp. 155–161.
15.
DittrichA., ‘Parameter sensitivity of procedures for on-line adaptation of the rotor time constant of induction machines with field oriented control’, IEE Proc. — Electr. Power Appl., 141(6) (1994), 353–359.
