This analysis presents cost estimates for mitigating nitrous oxide from cropland soils, and methane from livestock enteric fermentation, manure management and rice cultivation for major world regions. Total estimated global mitigation potential is approximately 64 MtCeq. in 2010 at negative or zero costs, 141 MtCeq. at $200/TCeq., and up to 168 MtCeq. at higher costs. Costs for individual options range from negative to positive in nearly every region, depending on emission, yield, input, labor, capital cost, and outside revenue effects. Future assessment requires improved accounting for multiple greenhouse gas effects, heterogeneity of emissions and yields, baseline management conditions, identification of options that generate farmer and societal benefits, adoption feasibility, and commodity market effects into mitigation decisions.
BatesJ. (2001). “Economic Evaluation of Emission Reductions of Nitrous Oxides and Methane in Agriculture in the EU: Bottom-up Analysis,” Contribution to a Study for DG Environment, European Commission by Ecofys Energy and Environment, AEA Technology Environment and National Technical University of Athens.
2.
CaiZ.SawamotoT.LiC.KangG.BoonjawatJ.MosierA.WassmannR.TsurutaH. (2003). “Field validation of the DNDC model for greenhouse gas emissions in East Asian cropping systems.” Global Biogeochem. Cycles17(4): 1107-1117.
3.
ChipatoC. (1999). “Ruminant methane in Zimbabwe.” Ruminant Workshop, Global Livestock Group, Washington, DC.
4.
Del Grosso, S., D. Ojima, W. Parton, A. Mosier, G. Peterson and D. Schimel (2002). “Simulated effects of dryland cropping intensification on soil organic matter and greenhouse gas exchanges using the DAYCENT ecosystem model.” Environmental Pollution116: S75-S83.
EIA (2003). Electricity Prices for Industry (www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/elecprii.html).
7.
EPA (2003). “Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2001.” Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA-430-R-03-004.
8.
EPA AgSTAR (2003). “Current Status of Farm-Scale Digesters.” AgSTAR Digest, EPA-430-F-02-028.
9.
FAO (2002). “World agriculture: towards 2015/2030.” Summary report. Rome.
GerbensS. (1998). “Cost-effectiveness of methane emission reduction from enteric fermentation of cattle and buffalo.” Draft Report.
12.
IEA (1999). “Technologies for the abatement of methane emissions, Volume 2.” IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.
13.
IPCC/UNEP/OECD/IEA (1997). “Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Environment Program, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Energy Agency, Paris.
14.
IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. HoughtonJ.T. (eds.), Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
15.
IPCC (2000). Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry. R.T. Watson (eds.), Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
16.
IRRI (2001). World Rice Statistics at www.irri.org/science/ricestat/index.asp.
17.
JohnsonD.PhetteplaceH.W.SeidlA.F.McCarlB.A. (2003). “A Comparison of Whole Farm Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Strategies for U.S. Dairy and Beef Production” (in preparation).
18.
KroezeC.MosierA. (1999). “New estimates for emissions of nitrous oxides.” In Second International Symposium on Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases, 8-10 September, 1999.MeyerL.A.BaedeA.P.M.Van HamJ.YbemaR. (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
19.
McCarlB.SchneiderU. (2001). “Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in U.S. Agriculture and Forestry.” Science294: 2481-2482.
20.
MoomawW.R. (2001). “Technological and Economic Potential of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction.” In Climate Change 2001: Mitigation, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III, Cambridge University Press.
21.
MoserC.M.BarrettC.B. (2002). “The System of Rice Intensification in Practice: Explaining Low Farmer Adoption and High Disadoption in Madagascar.” Cornell University Working Paper.
22.
MosierA.R.DoranJ.W.FreneyJ.R. (2002). “Managing soil denitrification.” Journal of Water and Soil Conservation57(6): 505-513.
23.
OECD (1998). “Agriculture and Forestry: identification of options for net greenhouse gas reduction.” Working Paper, Vol. VI, No. 67, OECD/GD(97)74.
24.
PrenticeI.C. (2001). “The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide.” In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I, Cambridge University Press.
25.
ReimerP.FreundP. (1999). “Technologies for reducing methane emissions.” IEA Greenhouse Gas Programme. (www.ieagreen.org.uk/prghgt43.htm).
26.
RosegrantM.W.MeijerS.ClineS.A. (2002). “International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model description.” available at: www.ifpri.org/themes/impact/impactmodel.pdf.
27.
ScheehleE.KrugerD. (2006). “Global Anthropogenic Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions.” Energy Journal (this issue).
28.
Van der Gon, H.A.D., P.M. Van Bodegom, R. Wassmann, R.S. Lantin and T.M. Metra-Corton (2001). “Sulfate-Containing Amendments to Reduce Methane Emissions from Rice Fields: Mechanisms, Effectiveness and Costs.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change6: 71-89.
29.
WassmannR.LantinR.S.NeueH.U.BuendiaL.V.CortonT.M.LuY. (2000). “Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. III. Mitigation options and future research needs.” Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems58: 23-36.
30.
World Bank (2003). World Development Indicators 2001, Table 2.5 Wages and productivity (www. worldbank.org).
