This paper measures the direct and indirect incidence of a carbon tax using current income and two measures of lifetime income to rank households. Our results suggest that carbon taxes are more regressive when annual income is used as a measure of economic welfare than when lifetime income measures are used. Further, the direct component of the tax, in any given year, is significantly more regressive than the indirect component. We observe a modest shift over time with the direct component of carbon taxes becoming less regressive and the indirect component becoming more regressive. These effects mostly offset each other and the distribution of the total tax burden has not changed much over time. In addition we find that regional variation has fluctuated over the years of our analysis. By 2003 there is little systematic variation in carbon tax burdens across regions of the country.
ArmingtonPaul S. (1969). “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production.” International Monetary Fund, Staff Paper #16:159-176.
2.
BovenbergA. LansGoulderLawrence(2001). “Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost?.” InCarraroC.MetcalfG. E. eds,, Distributional and Behavioral Effects of Environmental Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 45-85.
3.
BoydR.UriN.D. (1991), “The Impact of a Broad based Energy Tax on the U.S. Economy.” Energy Economics, 13(4):. 258-273
4.
BullNicholasHassettKevin A.MetcalfGilbert E. (1994). “Who Pays Broad-Based Energy Taxes? Computing Lifetime and Regional Incidence.” The Energy Journal, 15(3): 145-164.
5.
BurtrawDallasKrupnickAlanPalmerKarenPaulAnthonyTomanMichaelBloydCary (2002). “Ancillary Benefits of Reduced Air Pollution in the U.S. from Moderate Greenhouse Gas Mitigation policies in the Electricity Sector.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management45(3)650-673.
6.
CaspersenE.MetcalfGilbert (1993), “Is a Value Added Tax Progressive? Annual Versus Lifetime Measures.” National Tax Journal. 47(ISSUE): 731-746.
7.
ChernickH.ReschovskyA. (1992). “Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive?,” Institute for Research on Poverty, Discussion Paper 980-92
8.
Energy Information Administration (2006). “Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 2005.” Washington, DC: EIA.
9.
Energy Information Administration (2006). “Energy Market Impacts of Alternative Greenhouse Gas Intensity Reduction Goals.” Washington, DC: EIA.
10.
FriedmanM.A. (1957) A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
FullertonDonMetcalfGilbert E. (1998), “Environmental Taxes and the Double Dividend Hypothesis: Did You Really Expect Something for Nothing?,” Chicago-Kent Law Review. 73( 1): 221-256.
12.
FullertonDon (1995). “Why Have Separate Environmental Taxes?.” NBER, Working paper # 5380.
13.
GoulderL.H. (1992). “Carbon Tax Design and U.S. Industry Performance.” Tax Policy and the Economy6:59-104.
14.
HannonB. (1982). “Analysis of the Energy Cost of Economic Activities: 1963 to 2000.” Energy Systems Policy6(3):249-278.
15.
HannonB.AUTHORSLIST ALL. (1978). “Energy and Labor in the Construction Sector.” Science202 (204):37-47
16.
HerendeenR.A.FordC.HannonB. (1981). “Energy Cost of Living, 1972-1973.” Energy6(12):1433-1450.
17.
HudsonE.A.JorgensonD.W. (1974). “U.S. Energy Policy and Economic Growth, 1975-2000.” Bell Journal of Economics5(0): 461-514.
18.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). “Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report.” Geneva Switzerland: IPCC.
19.
JorgensonD.W.WilcoxenPJ. (1992). “Reducing U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Assessment of Different Instruments.” Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion paper # 1590.
20.
KruegerDirkFabrizioPerri (2002). “Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory.” NBER, Working paper # 9202.
21.
LeontiefW. (1986). Input-Output Economics, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
LyonA.SchwabR. (1995). “Consumption Taxes in a Life-Cycle Framework: Are Sin Taxes Regressive?,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(3):389-406.
23.
MetcalfGilbert E. (1999). “A Distributional Analysis of Green Tax Reforms,” National Tax Journal52(4): 655-682.
24.
MetcalfGilbert E. (2005). “Tax Reform and Environmental Taxation,” NBER, Working paper # 11665.
25.
MetcalfGilbert E. (2007). “A Proposal for a U.S. Carbon Tax Swap: An Equitable Tax Reform to Address Global Climate Change,” The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution. October.
26.
MetcalfGilbert E (2008). “An Empirical Analysis of Energy Intensity and Its Determinants at the State Level,” The Energy Journal29(3): 1-29.
27.
MetcalfGilbert E.PaltsevSergeyReillyJohn M.JacobyHenry D.HolakJennifer (2008). “Analysis of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Tax Proposals,” MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report # 160.
28.
MusgraveR.CaseK.LeonardH. (1974). “The Distribution of Fiscal Burdens and Benefits.” Public Finance Quarterly2: 259-311.
29.
PaltsevSergeyReillyJohn M.JacobyHenry D.GurgelAngelo C.MetcalfGilbert E.SokolovAndrei P.HolakJennifer F. (2007). “Assessment of U.S. Cap-and-Trade Proposals,” MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report # 146.
30.
PearceDavid (1991). “The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming.” The Economic Journal101: 938-948.
31.
PechmanJ. A. (1989). “Who Paid the Taxes, 1966-1985?,” Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
32.
PoterbaJames (1989), “Lifetime Incidence and the Distributional Burden of Excise Taxes,” The American Economic Review79( 2): 325-330.
33.
StolbergSheryl Gay (2007). “Bush Proposes Goal to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” New York Times, June1, 2007.
34.
TullockGordon (1967). “Excess Benefit.” Water Resources Research3(2):643-644.
