This paper presents a set of multi-gas mitigation scenarios that aim for stabilisation of greenhouse gas radiative forcing in 2150 at levels from 3.7 to 5.3 W/m2. At the moment, non-CO2 gasses (methane, nitrous oxide, PFCs, HFCs and SF6) contribute to about a quarter of the global emissions. The analysis shows that including these non-CO2 gases in mitigation analysis is crucial in formulating a cost-effective response. For stabilisation at 4.5 W/m2, a multi-gas approach leads to 40% lower costs than an approach that would focus at CO2-only. Within the assumptions used in this study, the non-CO2 gasses contribution to total reduction is very large under less stringent targets (up to 60%), but declines under stringent targets. While stabilising at 3.7 W/m2 obviously leads to larger environmental benefits than the 4.5 W/m2 case (temperature increase in 2100 are 1.9 and 2.3oC, respectively), the costs of the lower target are higher (0.80% and 0.34% of GDP in 2100, respectively). Improving knowledge on how future reduction potential for non-CO2 gasses could develop is shown to be a crucial research question.
AzarC.LindgrenK.LarsonE.MöllerstenK. (in press). “Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass - Costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere”, Climatic Change 74 (1-3): 47-79.
CriquiP.KouvaritakisN.(2000). “World energy projections to 2030”, International Journal of Global Energy Issues 14 (1): 116-136.
4.
CubashU.MeehlG. A. (2001). Projections of future climate change. in H. J.T., Y. Ding, D. J.
5.
Griggset al. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
de VriesH. J. M.Van VuurenD. P.den ElzenM. G. J.JanssenM. A. (2002). The Targets Image Energy model regional (TIMER) — Technical documentation. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
7.
DeAngeloB. J.de la ChesnayeF. C.BeachR. H.SommerA.MurrayB. C. (2006). “Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation in Agriculture”. Energy Journal (this issue).
8.
DelhotalK. C.de la ChesnayeF. C.GardinerA.BatesJ.SankovskiA. (2006). “Mitigation of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Waste, Energy and Industry”, Energy Journal (this issue).
9.
den ElzenM. G. J.LucasP. (2005). ‘The FAIR model: a tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of climate regimes’, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10(2), 115-134.
10.
den ElzenM. G. J.LucasP.Van VuurenD. P. (2005). “Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes”, Energy Policy 33 (16): 2138-2151.
11.
den Elzen, M. G. J. and M. Meinshausen (2005). Meeting the EU 2 degree target: Global and regional emission implications. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: RIVM.
12.
EickhoutB.denM. G. J.den ElzenM. G. J.Van VuurenD. P. (2003). Multi-gas emission profiles for stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations. Implications of limiting global temperature increase to 2 degrees Celsius. Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
13.
EllermanA. D.DecauxA. (1998). Analysis of Post-Kyoto CO2 emissions trading using marginal abatement curves. Cambridge, MA:: MIT.
14.
EMF-16 (1999). Economic and Energy System Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol: Results from the Energy Modeling Forum. Stanford: Energy Modeling Forum - Stanford University.
15.
EntingI. G.WigleyT. M. L.HeimannM. (1994). Future emissions and concentrations of carbon dioxide: Key ocean/atmosphere/land analysis. CSIRO Division of atmospheric research. available at http://www.dar.csiro.au/publications/enting_2001ao.htm.
16.
FAO (1999). FAOSTAT database collections. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. http://aps/fao.org/default.html.
17.
FenhannJ. (2000). “Industrial non-energy, non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 63 (2-3):
18.
FuglestvedtJ. S.BerntsenT. K.GodalO.SausenR.ShineK. P.SkodvinT. (2003). “Metrics of climate change: assessing radiative forcing and emission indices”, Climatic Change 58, 267-331.
19.
GrausW.HarmelinkM.HendriksC. (2004). Marginal GHG-Abatement curves for agriculture. Utrecht: Ecofys.
20.
GravelandC.BouwmanA. F.de VriesH. J. M.EickhoutB.StrengersB. J. (2002). Projections of multi-gas emissions and carbon sinks, and marginal abatement cost functions modelling for land-use related sources. Bilthoven: National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
21.
HansenJ.SatoM.RuedyR.LacisA.OinasV. (2000). “Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario”, PNAS 97 (18): 9875-9880.
22.
HendriksC.HarmelinkM.BurgesK.RanselK. (2004). Power and heat productions: plant developments and grid losses. Utrecht: Ecofys.
23.
HoogwijkM. (2004). On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources. PhD-thesis. Science, Technology and Society. Utrecht University. http://www.library.uu.nl/digiarchief/dip/diss/2004-0309-123617/full.pdf
24.
HourcadeJ. C.ShuklaP. (2001). Global, Regional and National Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation. in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
IEA (2000). Energy balances of OECD and Energy balances of non-OECD countries. Paris: International Energy Agency.
26.
IMAGE-team (2001). The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios. A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century. Bilthoven, the Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
27.
IPCC (1996). Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2005). Special Report on CO2 capture and storage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
JohanssonD. J. A.PerssonU. M.AzarC. (2006). “The Cost of Using Global Warming Potentials: Analysing the Trade off Between CO2, CH4 and N2O”. Climatic Change 77(3-4): 291-309.
31.
KauppiP.SedjoR. (2001). Technological and economic potential of options to enhance, maintain and manage biological carbon reservoirs and geo-engineering. in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LucasP.Van VuurenD. P.ElzenM. G. J.OlivierJ. G. J. (submitted). “Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases”.
33.
LucasP. L.Den ElzenM. G. J.Van VuurenD. P.(2005). A multi-gas abatement analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
34.
MatthewsB. J. H.Van YperseleJ. P. (2003). UNFCCC Article 2, stabilisation and uncertainty: engaging citizens with a web-based climate model. http://www.chooseclimate.org/
35.
MeinshausenM. (2005). Does a 2°C Target Mean for Greenhouse Gas Concentrations? A Brief Analysis Based on Multi-Gas Emission Pathways and Several Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty Estimates In: Schellnhuber HJ, W. Cramer, N. Nakicenovic, T. Wigley, G. Yohe (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
36.
MoritaT.RobinsonJ. (2001). Greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios and implications. in B. Metz, O. Davidson, R. Swart and J. Pan. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
OlivierJ. G. J.BerdowskiJ. J. M. (2001). Global emissions sources and sinks. in J. Berdowski, R. Guicherit and B. J. Heij. The Climate System. Lisse, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema Publishers/Swets &Zeitlinger Publishers.
38.
O’NeillB. C. (2003). “Economics, natural science and the costs of global warming potentials”, Climatic Change 58, 251-260.
39.
RamaswamyV. (2001). Radiative Forcing of Climate Change. in H. J.T., Y. Ding, D. J. Griggset al. Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
SchaeferD. O.GodwinD.HarnischJ. (2006). “Estimating Future Emissions and Potential Reductions of HFCs, PFCs and SF6”, Energy Journal,(this issue).
41.
ScheeleE. A.KrugerD. (2006). “Global Anthropogenic Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions”, Energy Journal (this issue).
42.
SchipperL. J.TingM.KhrushchM.GoloveW. B. (1997). “The Evolution of Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Energy Use in Industrialized Countries: An End-Use Analysis”, Energy Policy 25 (7-9): 651-672.
43.
SwartR.MitchellJ.MoritaT.RaperS. (2002). “Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment”, Global Environmental Change 12 (3): 155-165.
44.
SygnaL.FuglestvedtJ. S.AaheimH. A. (2002). “The adequacy of GWPs as indicators of damage costs incurred by global warming”, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7, 45-62.
45.
UNFCCC (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
46.
UNFCCC (2002). Methodological Issues, Scientific and methodological assessment of contributions to climate change, Report of the expert meeting, Note by the secretariat, FCCC/SBSTA/2002/INF.14 (http://www.unfccc.int).
47.
Van VuurenD. P.de VriesH. J. M.EickhoutB.KramT. (2004). “Responses and taxes in a simulated world”, Energy Economics.
48.
Van VuurenD. P.Den ElzenM. G.BerkM. M.LucasP. L.EickhoutB.EerensH.OostenrijkR. (2003). Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
49.
Van VuurenD. P.Den ElzenM. G. J.LucasP.EickhoutB.StrengersB. J.Van RuijvenB.WonkinkS.Van HoudtR., (in prep.). “Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations: an assessment of different strategies and costs using an integrated assessment framework”.
50.
White-House (2002). “Executive Summary of Bush Climate Change Initiative.”
51.
WigleyT. M. L. (1991). “Could reducing fossil-fuel emissions cause global warming”, Nature 349, 503-506.
52.
WigleyT. M. L.RaperS. C. B. (2001). “Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming.” Science293, 451-454.
