Comparing Greenhouse Gases for Policy Purposes *

Abstract

In order to derive optimal policies for greenhouse gas emissions control, the discounted marginal damages of emissions from different gases must be compared. The greenhouse warming potential (GWP) index, which is most often used to compare greenhouse gases, is not based on such a damage comparison. This essay presents assumptions under which ratios of gas-specific discounted marginal damages reduce to ratios of discounted marginal contributions to radiative forcing, where the discount rate is the difference between the discount rate relevant to climate-related damages and the rate of growth of marginal climate-related damages over time. If there are important gas-specific costs or benefits not tied to radiative forcing, however, such as direct effects of carbon dioxide on plant growth, there is in general no shortcut around explicit comparison of discounted net marginal damages.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases Climate policy Radiative forcing Greenhouse warming potential (GWP)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cline

William R.

(1992). The Economics of Global Warming. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

Eckaus

Richard S.

(1992). “Comparing the Effects of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Global Warming.” The Energy Journal 13(1): 25-36.

Hammond

Allen L.

Rodenburg

Eric

Moomaw

William

(1990). “Accountability in the Greenhouse.” Nature 347: 705-706.

Heal

Geoffrey

(1984). “Interactions Between Economy and Climate: A Framework for Policy Design under Uncertainty.” In V.K. Smith, and A.D. White, eds., Advances in Applied Micro-Economics, Volume 3. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

Heal

Geoffrey

(1991). “Economy and Climate: A Preliminary Framework for Microeconomic Analysis.” In R.E. Just and N. Bockstael, eds., Commodity and Resource Policies in Agricultural Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Hendricks

Darryll

(1991). “Optimal Policy Responses to an Uncertain Threat: The Case of Global Warming.” Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, Mimeo, December.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I (IPCC, 1990). Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group I (IPCC, 1992). Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lashof

Daniel A. and Dilip R. Ahuja

(1990). “Relative Contributions of Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Global Warming.” Nature 344: 529-531.

10.

Lind

Robert C.

(1984). Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.

11.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1990). “Contribution of Different Greenhouse Gases to Global Warming: A New Technique for Measuring Impact.” Yale University, Department of Economics, Mimeo, February.

12.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1991). “To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” Economic Journal 101: 920-937.

13.

Reilly

John M.

(1991). “Carbon Dioxide Emissions Control and Global Environmental Change.” In G.I. Pearman, ed., Limiting the Greenhouse Effect: Options for Controlling Atmospheric CO2 Accumulation. London: John Wiley.

14.

Reilly

John M.

Richards

Kenneth R.

(forthcoming). “Climate Change Damage and the Trace Gas Index Issue.” Environmental and Resource Economics.

15.

Smith

Kirk R. and Dilip R. Ahuja

(1990). “Toward a Greenhouse Equivalence Index: The Total Exposure Analogy.” Climatic Change 17: 1-7.

16.

Uzawa

Hirofumi

(1991). “Global Warming Initiatives: The Pacific Rim.” In R. Dornbusch and J. Poterba, eds., Global Warming: Economic Policy Response. Cambridge: MIT Press.