Many electric utilities offer their residential customers substantial financial incentives (low-interest loans or rebates) to install energy-efficient equipment and building retrofit measures (Stern, Berry, and Hirst 1985). For example, the Tennessee Valley Authority gave zero-interest loans to almost 500,000 households between 1977 and 1985; these loans average almost $1000 each for installation of retrofit measures (TVA 1985). Pacific Gas and Electric Company spent almost $100 million on administrative and debt service costs for its residential retrofit loan program, in which about 500,000 households participated (California PLC 1984).
Bonneville Power Administration (1980). Residential Weatherization Pilot Program.
2.
Bonneville Power Administration (1982). BPA Home Energy Efficiency Program, Residential Weatherization (January)
3.
Bonneville Power Administration (1984). Marginal Cost Analysis (September).
4.
Bonneville Power Administration (1984b). Technical Documentation: BPA Forecasts for Electricity Consumption. Office of Power Management (December).
5.
Bonneville Power Administration (1984c). Marginal Cost of Satisfying an Increment in Load. Office of Power Management, draft.
6.
California Public Utilities Commission (1984). 1983 Energy Conservation Program Summary (October). San Francisco; California Public Utilities Commission.
7.
FelsM. F. (1984). The Princeton Scorekeeping Method: An Introduction. Princeton University, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies. PU/CEES-163 (March). Princeton, N.J.:
8.
GoeltzR.HirstE.TrumbleD. (1986). Electricity Savings One to Three Years After Participation in the BPA Residential Weatherization Program. ORNL/CON-194 (April). Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
9.
HirstE., (1983). Evaluation of the BPA Residential Weatherization Pilot Program. ORNL/CON-124 (June). Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
10.
HirstE.GoeltzR. (1985). “Estimating Energy Savings due to Conservation Programmes.” Energy Economics7(1): 20-28.
11.
HirstE., (1985). Evaluation of the BPA Residential Weatherization Program. ORNL/CON-I8O (June). Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
12.
HirstE.WhiteD.HolubE.GoeltzR.(1985). Actual Electricity Savings for Homes Retrofit by the BPA Residential Weatherization Program. ORNL/CON-185 (July) Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
13.
LermanD.BronfmanB. (1984). Process Evaluation of the BPA Interim Residential Weatherization Program. ORNL/CON-158 (August) Oak Ridge, Tenn.:
14.
Northwest Power Planning Council (1983). Regional Conservation and Electric Power Plant (April). Portland, Oregon.
15.
PartiM.PartiC. (1980). “The Total and Appliance-Specific Conditional Demand for Electricity in the Household Sector.” Bell Journal of Economics11(1).
16.
SternP. C.BerryL. G.HirstE. (1985). “Residential Conservation Incentives.” Energy Policy13(2) 133-42
17.
Tennessee Valley Authority (1985). Conservation Report 1984. TVA Division of Conservation and Energy Managemen
