The Total Cost and Measured Performance of Utility-Sponsored Energy Efficiency Programs

Abstract

By examining the actual performance of conservation or demand-side management (DSM) programs for ten utilities, Joskow and Marron (1992) have made an important contribution to policy discussions about the wisdom of relying on utilities to improve customer energy efficiency. We use Joskow and Marrons method to analyze twenty utility commercial lighting programs and, like Joskow and Marron, find wide variations in industry reporting practices and savings evaluation methods. We extend the method by systematically accounting for several of the most important sources of variation and comment on how they influence total program costs. Our accounting also allows us to relate remaining program cost variations to the program sizes and the electric supply costs avoided by the programs. We draw qualified, yet affirmative, conclusions regarding the cost effectiveness of the programs.

Keywords

Electric utilities DSM US energy conservation electric lights performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Atkinson

Barbara A.

, (1992). Analysis of Federal Policy Options for Improving U.S. Lighting Energy Efficiency: Commercial and Residential Buildings. Berkeley California: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, December.

Berry

Linda

(1991). “The Administrative Cost of Energy Conservation Programs,” Energy Systems and Policy 15: 1-21.

Blumstein

Carl

Harris

Jeffrey

(1993). letter to Christine Gilbert, Letters Editor, Science 261: 970.

California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission (1987). Standard Practice Manual, Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Management Programs. Sacramento, California: California Energy Commission and California Public Utilities Commission, December.

Cambridge Systematics, Inc. (1993). Net-to-Gross Ratios for PG&E’s CIA Rebate Program, Study B - Manufacturer, Vendor and Contractor Surveys. San Francisco, California: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, September.

Eto

Joseph

Vine

Shown

Sonnenblick

Payne

(1994). The Cost and Performance of Utility Commercial Lighting Programs, Berkeley, California: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, May.

Hirst

Eric

Eto

Joseph

(1995). Justification for Electric-Utility Energy-Efficiency Programs. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, August.

Hirst

Eric

(1989). Comparison of Energy Information Agency Data Collections: Electricity Supply and Demand. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, October.

Joskow

Paul L.

(1992) “Weighing Environmental Externalities: Let’s Do it Right! ” The Electricity Journal 5 (4): 53-67.

10.

Joskow

Paul L.

Marron

Donald B.

(1992). “What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs.” The Energy Journal 13 (4): 41-74.

11.

Kahn

Edward

(1995). “Regulation by Simulation: The Role of Production Cost Models in Electricity Planning and Pricing.” Operations Research 43 (3): 388-398.

12.

Krause

Florentin

Eto

Joseph

(1988). Least-Cost Planning Handbook for Public Utility Commissioners: Volume 2 - The Demand Side: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Washington, DC: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, December.

13.

Levine

Mark D.

Sonnenblick

Richard

(1995). “On the Assessment of Utility Demand-Side Management Programs.” Energy Policy 22 (10): 848-856.

14.

Nadel

Steven M.

Keating

Kenneth M.

(1991). “Engineering Estimates versus Impact Evaluation Results: How Do They Compare and Why?” in Energy Program Evaluation: Uses, Methods, and Results, Proceedings of the 1991 Energy Program Evaluation Conference.

15.

Train

Kenneth E.

(1994). “Estimation of Net Savings from Energy-Conservation Programs.” Energy - The International Journal 19 (4): 423-441.

16.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (1994). Annual Energy Outlook, Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, December.

17.

U.S. Energy Information Administration (1992). Energy Consumption Series: Lighting in Commercial Buildings, Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration, March.