In recent years conservation received a great deal of attention from energy managers at all levels. Some conservation measures were undertaken voluntarily because they were profitable. Others were adopted to comply with regulations, many of which were intended to reduce social costs of energy production and delivery. The 1970s have been characterized as the era of natural gas shortages, and conservation represented one of many reasonable alternatives for utilities confronted by potential and actual excess demand.
LittleA. D. Inc. (1981a). Estimate of Conservation Potential for the SoCal Service Area. 1981-2000. Final Report. Los Angeles: SoCal.
2.
LittleA. D. Inc. (1981b). Estimate of Conservation Penetration for the SoCal Service Area. 1981-1986. Final Report. Los Angeles: SoCal.
3.
BerndtE.WoodD. (1976) “Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy,” Review of Economics and Statistics57(1): 59-68.
4.
BerndtE.WoodD. (1979). “Engineering and Economic Interpretations of Energy-Capital Complementarity.” American Economic Review63(3): 342-54.
5.
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). (1980). Decision 92497. San Francisco.
6.
ChiogiojiM. (1979). Industrial Energy Conservation. New York: Marcel Dekker.
7.
CrewM.KleindorferP. (1979). Public Utility Economics. New York: St. Martins Press.
8.
DennyM.FussM.WavcrmanL. (1981). “Substitution Possibilities for Energy.” In Berndt and Field, eds., Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.
9.
Ford Foundation. (1979) Energy: The Next Twenty Years. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.
10.
FussM.(1977). “The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing: An Example of the Estimation of Production Structures with Many Inputs.” Journal of Econometrics5(2): 89-116.
11.
GyftopoulousE. (1974). Potential Fuel Effectiveness in Industry. Cambridge: Ballinger.
12.
HudsonE.JorgensonD (1974). “U.S. Energy Policy and Economic Growth.” Bell Journal of Economics5(2): 461-514.
13.
HazillaM.KoppR. (1983). Substitution Between Energy and Other Factors of Production: U.S. Industrial Experience. 1958-1974. Final Report RP-1475. Palo Alto: EPRI.
14.
JacobyH.WrightA. (1982). “The Gordian Knot of Natural Gas Prices.” Energy Journal3(4): 1-25.
15.
KhazzoomJ. D. (1980). “Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency Standards for Household Appliances” Energy Journal 1(4) 21—39.
16.
KhazzoomJ. D. (1983). “Integrating Residential Conservation Measures Into Utility Demand Forecasts.” Public Utilities Fortnightly37(7): 23 30.
17.
KolkD.RoseA. (1982). Development of an Input-Output Forecasting Mode! of the Demand for Natural Gas. Final Report. Los Angeles: SoCal.
MorrisonW.SmithP. (1974). “Nonsurvey Input-Output Techniques at the Small Area Level: An Evaluation,” Journal of Regional Science14(1): 1-13.
20.
PageT. (1977). Conservation and Economic Efficiency. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
Peat Marwick, Mitchell, and Co. (1981). Implementing Financial Incentives for Alternative Energy Development. Final Report. Sacramento: California Energy Commission.
22.
PraulC.MarcusW.WeisenmillerR. (1982). “Delivering Energy Services: New Challenges for Utilities and Regulators.” Annual Review of Energy7 pp. 371-415.
23.
RoseA. (1984). “Technological Change and Input-Output Analysis: An Appraisal.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 18(5): 305-18.
24.
RoseA.KolkD. (1983a). Forecasting Natural Gas Demand in a Changing World. Mineral Resource Economics Monograph No. 6. Morgantown: West Virginia University.
25.
RoseA.KolkD. (1983b). “A Policy Simulation Model for Natural Gas Utilities.” Modeling and Simulation14(1): 71-78.
26.
SchipperL.HollanderJ.LevineM.CraigP. (1979). “The National Energy Conservation Policy Act: An Evaluation.” Natural Resources Journal19(4): 765-85.
27.
SmileyR. (1980). “A Marginalist Approach to Pncing U.S. Natural Gas.” Energy Economics4(3): 172-78.
28.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1979). Capital Stock Estimates for Input-Output Industries. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
WrightB. (1980). “The Cost of Tax-Induced Energy Conservation.” Bell Journal of Economics11(1): 84-107.
