The Valuation of Nuclear Power in The Post-Three Mile Island Era

Abstract

On March 28, 1979, an event at the Three Mile Island (TMI) nuclear plant of the General Public Utilities Corporation placed the future of nuclear power in the United States in doubt. The "transient" that led to the partial melting of the cladding around the fuel rods was to create concern in the nuclear industry and in the public at large about the safety, costs, and acceptability of nuclear power. While the impressionistic evidence is that TMI has caused great problems for the industry, there is little systematic evidence that this is the case. What real damage did the accident do to the prospects for nuclear power in the United States? The potential damages to the nuclear industry were of several varieties. First the accident might have caused people to reevaluate the safety of nuclear reactors.

Keywords

Nuclear power valuation Nuclear industry Reactor satety Energy policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Energy Information Administration (1979). Inventory of Power Plants in the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, December.

Fama

E. F.

(1976). Foundations of Finance. New York: Basic Books.

Friedlander

Gordon D.

(1979). “1979 Nuclear Plant Survey.” Electrical World 191 (January 15): 71-81.

Friedlander

Gordon D.

(1980). “1980 Nuclear Plant Survey.” Electrical World 193 (January 15): 51-61.

Gordon

Richard L.

(1981). “Reforming the Regulation of the U.S. Electric Power Industry: Part I. M.I.T. Energy Laboratory Working Paper MIT-EL81-021WP, May.

Laslavic

Thomas J.

(1981). “A Market Shock: The Effect of the Nuclear Accident at Three Mile Island upon the Prices of Electric Utility Securities.” Unpublished M.S. thesis, M.I.T. Sloan School of Management, June.

National Coal Association (1978). Steam Electric Plant Factors. Washington, D.C.