Optimizing Tax Strategies to Reduce Greenhouse Gases Without Curtailing Growth *

Abstract

Increasing federal gasoline taxes is one of the policy options available for reducing gasoline consumption and the resulting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions that contribute to global warming. At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), DRI/McGraw-Hill (DRI) estimated the levels of gasoline tax that would be necessary to stabilize CO2 emissions from the light-vehicle fleet over a 20-year period, and the economic impacts of such a tax. Three options for utilizing the revenues generated are examined: a reduction of the federal budget deficit, a reduction in personal and corporate income taxes, and a reduction in the employer-paid portion of payroll taxes. Each option would yield markedly different levels of economic performance: while the first two options would result in reductions in economic growth, the third option (a reduction in the employer-paid portion of payroll taxes) would result in relatively slight negative economic impacts in the short term and positive economic impacts in the long term.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases Taxes US EPA CO2 emission reduction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Congressional Budget Office (1990). Carbon Charges as a Response to Global Warming: The Effects of Taxing Fossil Fuels. Washington, DC (August).

Dahl

C A.

(1986). “Gasoline Demand Survey.” The Energy Journal 7(1): 67-82.

Dahl

C. A.

(1988). “A Summary of Gasoline Demand Studies with Selected Equations.” Draft (April).

DRI/McGraw-Hill (1990). “Quarterly Model of the U.S. Economy, Model Documentation: Theory, Properties and Coverage.” Lexington, MA (March).

DRI/McGraw-Hill (1991). An Analysis of Public Policy Measures to Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the U.S. Transportation Sector. (January).

Edmonds

J. A.

(1989). “A Second Generation Greenhouse Gas Emission Model: Outline of Design and Approach.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Energy and Environmental Modeling and Policy Analysis. MIT Center for Energy Policy Research.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1990). “Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment.” Final Report of Work Group One, World Meteorological Organization/United Nations Environment Program. Cambridge, UK.

Jorgenson

Wilcoxen

(forthcoming). “Reducing U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions.” John Moroney, ed., Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Kaya

Yoichi

(1989). “Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios.” IPCC/RSWG mimeograph (May).

10.

Khazzoom

J. D.

(1988). “Quantification of the Environmental Impact of a Gasoline Tax.” Washington, DC Congressional Research Service.

11.

Manne

A. S.

Richets

R. G.

(1991). “Global CO2 Emission Reductions - The Impacts of Rising Energy Costs.” The Energy Journal. 12(1): 87-107.

12.

Miles-Mclean

Shelby

Lula

Sagan

Train

(1991). “Personal Vehicle Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions: A Household-Level Forecasting Model for National Policy Analysis.” Draft Paper (May).

13.

Montgomery

(1991). “Effects on Energy Markets and the U.S. Economy of Measures to Reduce CO2 Emissions from Fossil Fuels.” Proceedings. MIT Conference on Energy and Technology in the 21st Century.

14.

Tietenberg

Tom

(1984). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Co.

15.

U.S. Department of Energy (1987). “Cost and Benefit Analysis of a Motor Fuels Tax.” SR/EAFD/87-02. Washington, DC: Energy Information Agency (March).

16.

U.S. Department of Energy (1990). “The Economics of Long-Term Global Climate Change: A Preliminary Assessment.” Report of an Interagency Task Force. Washington, DC: Office of Policy, Planning and Analysis (September).