This paper examines changes in the utilization rates (annual capacity factors) of coal-burning power plants in the eastern United States after 1996, when federal regulators opened the transmission system to wholesale power markets. This and other accompanying market-oriented reforms were intended to improve efficiency by encouraging regional dispatch by independent system operators. If the reforms made dispatch more efficient, then utilization rates of high-cost plants should have fallen relative to those of low-cost plants since 1996. A difference-in-difference model using plant-level panel data indicates that relative utilization rates of high-cost plants did indeed fall after 1996, but only in regions with independent system operators. Simulations indicate cost savings on the order of two to three percent.
BorensteinSeverinBushnellJames (1999). “An Empirical Analysis of the Potential for Market Power in California’s Electricity Market.” Journal of Industrial Economics47(3): 285-323.
2.
SeverinBorensteinBushnellJames (2000). “Electricity Restructuring: Deregulation or Reregulation?” Regulation, 23(2): 46-52.
3.
BorensteinSeverinBushnellJamesWolakFrank A. (2002). “Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market.” American Economic Review92 (5): 13761405.
4.
BorensteinSeverinBushnellJamesKnittelC. (1999). “Market Power in Electricity Markets: Beyond Concentration Measures.” The Energy Journal20(4): 65-88.
5.
BushnellJamesMansurErin T.SaraviaCeleste (2004). “Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation.” Center for the Study of Energy Markets Working Paper WP-126. March.
6.
CavesD. W.ChristensenL. R.SwansonJ. A. (1981). Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74. American Economic Review71(6): 994-1002.
7.
ChristensenL. R.GreeneW.H. (1976). Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation. Journal of Political Economy84(4): 655-676.
8.
ConsidineTimothy J. (2000). Cost Structures for Fossil Fuel-Fired Electric Power Generation. The Energy Journal21(2): 83-104.
9.
Energy Information Administration (EIA) Electric Power Annual 2000: Volume I.
10.
GreenRichard J. and David M. Newbery (1992). “Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market.” Journal of Political Economy100(5): 929-953.
HortacsuAliPullerSteven L. (2004). “Testing Strategic Models of Firm Behavior in Restructured Electricity Markets: A Case Study of ERCOT.” Center for the Study of Energy Markets Working Paper WP-125. March.
13.
JoskowPaul L. (2003). “The Difficult Transition to Competitive Electricity Markets in the U.S.” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0328, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
14.
JoskowPaul L. (1997). “Restructuring, Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives11(3): 119-138.
15.
JoskowPaul L.SchmalenseeRichard (1983). Markets for Power: An Analysis of Electric Utility Deregulation. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.
16.
JoskowPaul L.SchmalenseeRichard (1987). “The Performance of Coal-Burning Electric Generating Units in the United States: 1960-1980.’, Journal of Applied Econometrics2(2): 85109
17.
KleitAndrew N.TerrellDek (2001). “Measuring Potential Efficiency Gains from Deregulation of Electricity Generation: A Bayesian Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3) 523530.
18.
LaffontJean-JacquesTiroleJean (1993). A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.
19.
MansurErin T. (2003). “Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct.” Center for the Study of Energy Markets Working Paper WP-117. October.
20.
MarkiewiczKiraRoseNancy L.WolframCatherine (2004). “Has Restructuring Improved Operating Efficiency at US Electricity Generating Plants?” Mimeo, University of California at Berkeley. April.
21.
NelsonRandy A. (1985). “Returns to Scale from Variable and Total Cost Functions: Evidence from the Electric Power Industry.” Economics Letters18, 271-276.
22.
NerloveM. (1963). “Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply. In Measurements in Economics—Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld, edited by ChristC. F.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23.
NewberyDavid M.PollittMichael G. (1997). “The Restructuring and Privatization of Britain’s CEGB: Was it Worth it?” Journal of Industrial Economics45(3), 269-303.
24.
StiglerGeorgeFriedlandClaire (1962), What Can Regulators Regulate? The Case of Electricity, Journal of Law and Economics5: 1-16.
25.
StoftSteven (2002) Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity, New York: IEEE/Wiley.
26.
US-Canada Power System Outage Task Force (2004), Final Report on the August 14th, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations. April 5. Available at http://www.nerc.com/∼filez/blackout.html.
27.
WinstonClifford (1993). “Economic Deregulation: Days of Reckoning for Microeconomists.” Journal of Economic Literature31(3): 1263-1289.
28.
WolframCatherine (2003). “The Efficiency of Electricity Generation in the U.S. After Restructuring.” Center for the Study of Energy Markets Working Paper 111, Berkeley, CA: University of California Energy Institute.
