The German energy industries will be subjected to regulation of network access enforced by a sector-specific regulator. Whereas the gas industry broke the regime of negotiated third party access, in electricity nTPA ‘worked’, although it clearly resulted in a margin squeeze. The government currently discusses whether to use rate-of-return or incentive regulation, to allow ex-ante approval of charges, and the length of the regulatory lag. Close examination suggests that generation capacity still is adequate, but in the longer term there is reason to be alert. The regulatory changes and emission trading system can both contribute to supply security by increasing investment.
BeardT.R.KasermanD.L.MayoJ.W. (2001). “Regulation, Vertical Integration and Sabotage.” Journal of Industrial Economics49(3): 319-333.
2.
BergmanL.BrunekreeftG.DoyleC.von der FehrN.-H.NewberyD.M.PollittM.RégibeauP. (1999). A European Market for Electricity? Monitoring European Deregulation 2. London/Stockholm: CEPR/SNS.
3.
BMWA (2003). Monitoringbericht. August 31, 2003. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit, Berlin.
4.
BrunekreeftG.TwelemannS. (2004). “Institutionelle Reformen und Versorgungssicherheit: Status Quo und Perspektiven der deutschen Stromwirtschaft.“ Zeitschrift fur Energiewirtschaft28(3): 163-174.
5.
BrunekreeftG. (2002). ”Regulation and Third-Party Discrimination in the German Electricity Supply Industry.” European Journal of Law and Economics13(3): 203-220.
6.
BrunekreeftG. (2003). Regulation and Competition Policy in the Electricity Market; Economic Analysis and German Experience. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
7.
BrunekreeftG. (2004). ’Regulatory Threat in Vertically Related Markets: The Case of German Electricity.” European Journal of Law and Economics17(2): 285-305.
8.
Bundeskartellamt (2001). Bericht der Arbeitsgruppe Netznutzung Strom der Kartellbehörden des Bundes und der Länder. 19 April 2001. Bundeskartellamt, Bonn.
9.
BurnsM.R. (1986). “Predatory Pricing and the Acquisition Costs of Competitors.” Journal of Political Economy94(2): 266-296.
10.
CAISO (2000). Report on California Energy Market Issues and Performance: May-June 2000.
11.
Special Report. Aug. 10, 2000. California Independent System Operator.
12.
CantyK. (2003). Überhöhungswirkung der VV II Plus auf Netznutzungsentgelte (Strom). Presentation at VIK. Sept.18, 2003.
13.
DrasdoP.. (1998). Konzentration und Wettbewerb in der Deutschen Energiewirtschaft. München: R.Oldenbourg Verlag.
14.
GabelmannA. (2002). Netzzugang in der Telekommunikation. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
15.
GlachantJ.-M.DuboisU.PerezY. (2004). ’Deregulating with no Regulator: Is Germany’s Electricity Transmission Regime Institutionally Correct?” mimeo. ADIS Research Centre. University of Paris XI.
16.
GrowitschChrWeinT. (2004). ’Negotiated Third Party Access - An Industrial Organisation Perspective.” mimeo. University of Lüneburg.
17.
JESS (2003). ”Joint Energy Security of Supply Working Group; Third Report.” November 2003. Ofgem/DTi, London.
18.
KniepsG. (2002). “Wettbewerb auf den Ferntransportnetzen der deutschen Gaswirtschaft - Eine netzökonomische Analyse.“ Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft26(3): 171-180.
19.
MandyD.M. (2000). ”Killing the Goose that may have laid the Golden Egg: Only the Data Know Whether Sabotage Pays.” Journal of Regulatory Economics (17)2: 157-172.
MeranG.von HirschhausenChr (2004). ”Corporate Self-Regulation vs. ex-ante Regulation - The Case of the German Gas Sector.” mimeo. DIW, Berlin.
22.
Monopolkommission (2003). Wettbewerbspolitik im Schatten “Nationaler Champions“. 15th main report. Monopolkommission, Bonn.
23.
MüllerChrWienkenW. (2004). “Measuring the degree of economic opening in the German electricity market“, Utilities Policy.
24.
NAPG (2004). National Allocation Plan for the Federal Republic of Germany. March 31, 2004. BMU, Berlin.
25.
nera (2000). Wirtschaftliche Effizienz und wettbewerbliche Aspekte der Bereitstellung von Regelenergie in Deutschland; Ein Gutachten fur den Verband kommunaler Unternehmen (VKU). Sept. 2000. nera, London.
26.
NewberyD.M. (1995). ”Power Markets and Market Power.” Energy Journal16(3): 39-66.
27.
OECD (2003). Regulatory Reform; Review of Germany. OECD, Paris.
28.
PeekM.BartelsM.GatzenC. (2004). “Modellgestutzte Analyse der Auswirkungen des CO2-Zertifikatehandels auf die deutsche Elektrizitatswirtschaft.“ Zeitschrift fur Energiewirtschaft28(1): 65-73.
29.
PfaffenbergerW.HilleM. (2003). ZukUnftige Energieoptionen: Sicherung der Investitionen in die Elektrizitdtsversorgung; Report. Bremer Energie Institut, Bremen.
30.
RitzauM. (2003). Regelenergiemarkt in Deutschland. Vortrag an der ETH Zurich, June 2003. http://www.eeh.ee.ethz.ch/.
31.
SalonerG. (1987). ”Predation, Mergers and Incomplete Information”, Rand Journal of Economics18(2): 165-186.
32.
UBS (2003). German Electricity Wholesale Market. UBS Investment Research. October 2003.
33.
UCTE (2003). UCTE system adequacy forecast 2004-2010, UCTE, Draft December 2003.
34.
UCTE (2004). UCTE system adequacy retrospect 2003, UCTE, June 2004.
