A model is developed and estimated that forecasts the share of an electric utility's customers who would switch to a competitor under various price discounts and service attributes (reliability, renewable power, energy conservation assistance, and customer service.) The method builds upon previous double-bounded dichotomous choice procedures, extended to account for the multi-attribute nature of electric power service.
Aptech Systems, Inc. (1996a). GAUSS - Mathematical and Statistical System, Manual.
2.
Aptech Systems, Inc. (1996b). GAUSS Applications - Maximum Likelihood, Manual.
3.
BrownstoneD.TrainK. (1996). “Forecasting New Product Penetration with Flexible Substitution Patterns.” Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
4.
CaiY. (1997). “Customer Choice Forecasting Model.” Report, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Sacramento, CA.
5.
CameronT.A.. (1988). “A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Refemdum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management15: 355-379.
6.
CameronT.A.JamesM.D. (1987). “Efficient Estimation Methods for Closed-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics69: 269-276.
7.
CameronT.A.QuigginJ. (1994). “Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a ‘Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up’ Questionnaire”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management27: 218-234.
8.
CarsonR.T.MitchellR.C. (1987). “Economic Value of Reliable Water Supplies for Residential Water Users in the State Water Project Service Area.” Report prepared for the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
9.
Freeman, Sullivan & Co. (1995). “SMUD Customer Attitudes, Needs, and Opinions: Nori-Residential and Residential Telephone Survey Results.” Final report.
10.
HanemannM.LoomisJ.KanninenB. (1991). “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics.73: 1255-1263.
11.
HausmanJ.A., ed., (1993.) Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment. New York: North-Holland.
12.
HildebrandtE.W. (1996). “Discrete Choice Model of Switching Behavior of Customers.” Memo, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Sacramento, CA.
13.
ImberD.StevensonG.WilksL. (1991). “A Contingent Valuation Survey of the Kakadu Conservation Zone.” Research Paper No. 3, Resource Assessment Commission, Canberra, Australia.
14.
ReveltD.TrainK. (1997). “Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices of Appliance Efficiency Levels.” The Review of Economics and Statistics. Forthcoming.
