Britain was the exemplar of electricity market reform, demonstrating the importance of ownership unbundling and workable competition in generation and supply. Privatisation created de facto duopolies that supported increasing price-cost margins and induced excessive (English) entry. Concentration was ended by trading horizontal for vertical integration in subsequent mergers. Competition arrived just as the Pool was replaced by New Electricity Trading Arrangements (NETA) intended to address its claimed shortcomings. NETA cost over £700 million, and had ambiguous market impacts. Prices fell dramatically as a result of (pre-NETA) competition, generating companies withdrew plant, causing fears about security of supply and a subsequent widening of price-cost margins.
BohnR.E.CaramanisM.C.SchweppeF.C., (1984). ‘Optimal pricing in electrical networks over space and time’, Rand Journal of Economics, 15(3): 360-376.
2.
BowerJ. (2002). ‘Why Did Electricity Prices Fall in England and Wales?: Market Mechanism of Market Structure?’, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies Working Paper, EL O2.
3.
CurrieD. (2000). “The New Electricity Trading Arrangements in England &Wales: A Review”, The Beesley Lectures on Regulation, The Institute of Economic Affairs and the London Business School, 10 October 2000.
4.
DTI (2002). Joint Energy Security of Supply Working Group First Report, June, at http://www.dti.go.uk/energy/jess.
5.
DTI (2003). Joint Energy Security of Supply Working Group Third Report, November, at http://www.dti.go.uk/energy/jess.
6.
DTI (2004). Joint Energy Security of Supply Working Group Fifth Report, November, at http://www.dti.go.uk/energy/jess.
7.
EvansJ.GreenR. (2003). ‘Why did British electricity prices fall after 1998?’ CMI WP26 (available at http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/electricity/publications/wp/index.htm).
8.
HortacsuA.PullerS.L. (2004). ‘Testing strategic models of firm behavior in restructured electricity markets: a case study of ERCOT’, CSEM WP 125 (available at http://www.ucei.berkely.edu/pubs-csemwp.html).
9.
von der FehrN-H. M.HarbordD., (1993). ‘Spot market competition in the UK electricity industry’, Economic Journal, 103: 531-46.
10.
FabraN.von der FehrN-HHarbordD., (2004). ‘Designing electricity auctions’, CSEM WP 122 (available at http://www.ucei.berkely.edu/pubs-csemwp.html).
11.
GreenR.J.Newberyand D.M., (1992). ‘Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market’, Journal of Political Economy, 100(5): 929-53.
12.
GreenR.J. (2004a). ‘Did English Generators play Cournot? Capacity withholding in the Electricity Pool’, CMI WP41 (available at http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/electricity/publications/wp/index.htm).Green, R.J. (2004b). ‘Electricity Transmission Pricing: How much does it cost to get it wrong”, CMI WP63 (available at http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/electricity/publications/wp/index.htm).
13.
GreenR.J., (2004b). ‘Electricity Transmission Pricing: How much does it cost to get it wrong”, CMI WP63 (available at http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/electricity/publications/wp/index.htm).
14.
HenneyA. (1994). A study of the privatisation of the Electricity Supply Industry in England and Wales, London EEE Ltd.
15.
HenneyA. (2001). ‘The illusory politics and imaginary economics of NETA’, Power UK, March, 16-26.
16.
House of Commons (1993). British Energy Policy and the Market for Coal: Report HC 237. London: HMSO.
17.
KlempererP. D.MeyerM.A., (1989). ‘Supply Function Equilibria in Oligopoly under Uncertainty’, Econometrica, 57(6): 1243-1277.
18.
MMC (1996). National Power plc and Southern Electric plc: A Report on the proposed merger, Monopolies and Mergers Commission Cm 3230, London: HMSO.
19.
NewberyD. M. (1992). ‘Supply function equilibria’, mimeo, Cambridge.
20.
NewberyD. M. (1995). 'Power Markets and Market Power’, Energy Journal16(3): 41-66.
21.
NewberyD. M. (1998a). 'Competition, Contracts and Entry in the Electricity Spot Market’, RAND Journal of Economics, 29(4): 726-49.
22.
NewberyD. M. (1998b). 'Pool Reform and Competition in Electricity’, ch.5, pp 117-166 in BeesleyM. (ed.) Regulating Utilities: Understanding the Issues, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
23.
NewberyD. M. (1998c). 'The Regulator’s Review of the English Electricity Pool’, Utilities Policy, 7(3): 129-41.
24.
NewberyD.M.McDanielT. (2003). ‘Auctions and Trading In Energy Markets - An Economic Analysis’, Ch 10, pp 195-234 in CRI Regulatory Review 2002/2003VassP. (ed.) Bath: Centre for the Study of Regulated Industries.
25.
NewberyD. M.PollittM. G. (1997). ‘The Restructuring and Privatisation of the CEGB - Was it worth it’, Journal of Industrial Economics, XLV (3): 269-303.
26.
NGC (1997). Report on the Tender for the 1997/98 Standing Reserve Service, National Grid Company plc.
27.
NGC (2004). National Grid Company Consultation on Options for Allocating GB Transmission Access Rights under BETTA, 21 May 2004, available at http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/
28.
Offer (1992). Review of Pool Prices, December, Office of Electricity Regulation, Birmingham.
29.
Offer (1998a). Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements: Background paper 1 — Electricity Trading Arrangements in England and Wales, February, Birmingham: Office of Electricity Regulation.
30.
Offer (1998b). Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements: Background Paper 2—Electricity Trading Arrangements in other Countries, February, Birmingham: Office of Electricity Regulation.
31.
Offer (1998c). Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements: Working Paper on Trading Inside and Outside the Pool, March, Birmingham: Office of Electricity Regulation.
32.
Offer (1998d). Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements — Interim Conclusions, June, Birmingham: Office of Electricity Regulation.
33.
Offer (1998e). Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements, July, Birmingham: Office of Electricity Regulation.
34.
Offer (1999). The new electricity trading arrangements (Volume 1), July, Birmingham: Office of Electricity Regulation.
35.
Ofgem (2002). Annual ReportLondon: Office of Gas and Electricity Markets.
36.
PatrickR.H.WolakF.A. (1997), ‘Estimating the customer-level demand for electricity under real-time pricing’, paper presented to the POWER conference, March, Berkeley: University of California Energy Institute.
37.
PollittM.G. (1999). ‘The Restructuring and Privatisation of the Electricity Supply Industry in Scotland’ Cambridge: mimeo (available at http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/electricity/people/pollitt/esiscotland.pdf).
38.
RobinsonG. (2001). The Unconventional Minister: My life inside New Labour, London: Penguin.
39.
ShuttleworthG. (1999). ‘The Electricity Industry 1997-98’, ch. 2, pp 19-34 in Regulatory Review 1998/9, ed. P. Vass, CRI, University of Bath.
40.
SweetingA. (2001). ‘Market outcomes and generator behaviour in the England and Wales wholesale electricity market 1995-2000’, mimeo, MIT.
