This paper examines the relative performance of electricity distribution systems in the UK and Japan between 1985 and 1998 using cost-based benchmarking with data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) methods. The results suggest that the productivity gain in the UK electricity distribution has been larger than in the Japanese sector. In particular, productivity growth accelerated during the last years when the UK utilities were operating under tightened revenue caps. It also suggests that efficiency scores are higher for UK utilities. The findings also highlight the advantages of using multiple techniques in comparative analysis and in incentive regulation.
BankerR. D.CharnesA.CooperW. W. (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science30(9)(September): 1078-1092.
2.
BankerR. D.MoreyR. C. (1986). “Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs.” Operations Research34 (4): 513-521.
3.
BatteseG.CoelliT. (1993). “A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Incorporating a Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects.” Working Paper No. 69, Department of Econometrics, University of New England.
4.
BatteseG.CoelliT. (1995). “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function.” Empirical Economics20: 325-332.
5.
BurnsP.Weyman-JonesT. (1996). “Cost Functions and Cost Efficiency in Electricity Distribution: A Stochastic Frontier Approach.” Bulletin of Economic Research48 (1): 41-64.
6.
CharnesA.CooperW. W.RhodesE. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research2(6): 429-444.
7.
ChennellsL. (1997). “The Windfall Tax.” Fiscal Studies18(3): 279-291.
8.
CoelliT. (1996). “A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation.” Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England.
9.
CoelliT.PerelmanS. (1999). “A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Distance Functions: With Application to European Railways.” European Journal of Operational Research117: 326-339.
10.
CoelliT.PerelmanS.RomanoE. (1999). “Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines.” Journal of Productivity Analysis11: 251-273.
11.
CoelliT.RaoD. S. P.BatteseG. E. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12.
ComnesG. A.StoftS.GreeneN.HillL.J. (1995). “Performance-Based Ratemaking for Electric Utilities: Review of Plans and Analysis of Economic and Resource Planning Issues.” Volume I, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and University of California, Berkeley.
13.
CooperW. W.SeifordL. M.ToneK. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References andDEA-solver software. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14.
DomahP.PollittM. (2001). “The Restructuring and Privatisation of Electricity Distribution and Supply Businesses in England and Wales: A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Fiscal Studies22: 107-46.
15.
FäreR.GrabowskiR.GrosskopfS. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16.
FäreR.GrosskopfS.LindgrenB.RoosP. (1989). “Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach.” In CharnesA.CooperW.W.LewinA.Y.SeifordL.M. eds., Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17.
FørsundF. R.HjalmarssonL. (1974). “On the Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Swedish Journal of Economics76(2): 141-154.
18.
FarrellM. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series A120: 253-281.
19.
FørsundF. R. (1993). “Productivity Growth in Norwegian Ferries.” In FriedH. O.LovellC.A. K.SchmidtS. S., eds., The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
GotoM.TsutsuiM. (1998). “Comparison of Productive and Cost Efficiencies Among Japanese and U.S. Electric Utilities.” Omega26: 177-194.
21.
GreenR. (1996). “Reform of the Electricity Supply Industry in the UK.” Journal of Energy Literature2(1): 3-24.
22.
HallG. L. (2000). “Electricity Pricing and Regulatory Practice in a Competitive Environment.” Workshop Paper No. 2: Analysis of Alternative Ratemaking Methodologies. By Hagler Bailly Services, Inc. for the Asian Development Bank and the Philippines Energy Regulatory Board and Department of Energy, Manila.
23.
HattoriT. (2002a). “Regulatory Reform of the Electricity Industry in Japan: An Overview of the Process.” In BergS.PollittM.G.TsujiM., eds., Private Initiative in Infrastructure. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
24.
HattoriT. (2002b). “Relative Performance of U.S. and Japanese Electricity Distribution - An Application of Stochastic Frontier Analysis.” Journal of Productivity Analysis18: 269-284.
25.
HillL. (1995). “A Primer on Incentive Regulation for Electric Utilities.” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
26.
HollingsworthB.SmithP. (2003). “Use of Ratios in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Applied Economics Letters10:733-735.
27.
IPART (1999). “Efficiency and Benchmarking Study of the NSW Distribution Businesses.” Research Paper No. 13. Sydney. Prepared by London Economics for the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART), New South Wales.
28.
JamasbT.PollittM. (2001a). “Benchmarking and Regulation of Electricity Distribution and Transmission Utilities: Lessons from International Experience.” DAE Working Paper 01/01, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.
29.
JamasbT.PollittM. (2001b). “Benchmarking and Regulation: International Electricity Experience.” Utilities Policy9: 107-130.
30.
JamasbT.PollittM. (2003). “International Benchmarking and Regulation: An Application to European Electricity Distribution Utilities.” Energy Policy31 (December): 1609-1622.
31.
JoskowP. J.SchmalenseeR. (1986). “Incentive Regulation for Electric Utilities.” Yale Journal on Regulation4: 1-49.
32.
OFFER (1994). “The Distribution Price Control: Proposals.” Office of Electricity Regulation, August.
33.
OFGEM (1999). “Review of Public Electricity Suppliers 1998-2000, Distribution Price Control Review: Final Draft.” Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, December.
34.
OFGEM (2001). “Incentive Schemes: Final Proposals. Information and Incentives Project” Office of Gas and Electricity Markets, December.
35.
NavarroP. (1996). “The Japanese Electric Utility Industry.” In GilbertR.KahnE., eds., International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
NeubergL. (1977). “Two Issues in Municipal Ownership of Electric Power Distribution Systems.” Bell Journal of Economics8 (Spring): 303-323.
37.
PollittM. (1995). Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
ShleiferA. (1985). “A Theory of Yardstick Competition.” Rand Journal of Economics16: 319-327.
39.
ThanassoulisE. (2001). Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40.
TulkensH.EeckautP. V. (1995). “Non-Parametric Efficiency, Progress and Regress Measures for Panel data: Methodological Aspects.” European Journal of Operational Research80: 474-499.
41.
Weyman-JonesT.G. (1994). “Problems of Yardstick Regulation in Electricity Distribution.” In BishopM.KayJ.MayerC., eds., The Regulatory Challenge. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
ZhangY.BartelsR. (1998). “The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden, and New Zealand.” Journal of Productivity Analysis9: 187-204.
