This study estimates the efficiency of biogas plants and identifies determinants of inefficiencies. Data Envelopment Analysis is applied on a sample of 86 Austrian biogas plants for the year 2014, covering about one third of the installed electric capacity of Austrian biogas plants. We decompose technical efficiency into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency (managerial efficiency). In a second-stage regression analysis the effects of subsidies and other variables on managerial efficiency are investigated. The main results are: i) 34% of biogas plants in our sample are technically efficient, 40% are scale efficient and 50% are managerial efficient; ii) small biogas plants (<100 kW) are scale inefficient exhibiting increasing returns to scale; iii) production subsidies show a significant, negative relationship to managerial efficiency. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that production subsidies provide a disincentive to managerial effort of plant operators.
AllenK. (1999). “DEA in the ecological context: an overview.” In G. Westermann, ed., Data Envelopment Analysis in the Service Sector. Wiesbaden: Gabler, pp. 203-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08343-6_11.
2.
AsmildM.PastorJ.T. (2010). “Slack free MEA and RDM with comprehensive efficiency measures.” Omega38(6): 475-483. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.004.
3.
BMLFUW (2004). Sonderrichtlinie fur die Umsetzung de. “Sonstigen Maβinahmen" des österreichischen Programms für die Entwicklung des ländlichen Raumes. Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management (BMLFUW). Accessed March 24,2016. http://www.salzburg.gv.at/elnk-sonderrichtlinie_sonstige_ massnahmen.pdf.
4.
BankerR.CharnesA.CooperW.W. (1984). “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data
BogetoftP.OttoL. (2011). Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.
7.
BraunR.LaaberM.MadlenerR.BrachtlE.KirchmayrR. (2007). Aufbau eines Bewertungssystems fur Biogasanla-gen —. “Gütesiegel Biogas.” Tulln: Department of Agrobiotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences. Accessed March 24,2016. https://www.fcn.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/global/show_document.asp?id=aaaaaaaaaahdapo.
8.
CameronA.CTrivediP.K. (2005). Microeconometrics — methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CharnesA.CooperW.W.RhodesE. (1978). “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.” European Journal of
10.
Operational Research 2: 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
11.
ChambersR.G.ChungY.H.FareR. (1998). “Profit, Directional Distance Functions and Nerlovian Efficiency.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications98: 351-364. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637501082.
12.
CookW.D.ToneK.ZhuJ. (2014). “Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model.” Omega44: 1-4. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004.
13.
DatkovD.EffenbergerM. (2010). “Data envelopment analysis for assessing the efficiency of biogas plants: capabilities and limitations.” Journal of Processing and Energy in Agriculture14(1): 49-53. http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1821-4487/2010/1821-44871001049D.pdf.
14.
DatkovD.EffenbergerM.LehnerA.MartinovM.TesicM.GronauerA. (2012). “New method for assessing the performance of agricultural biogas plants.” Renewable Energy40(1): 104-112. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.09.026.
15.
DatkovD.EffenbergerM.MartinovM. (2014). “Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems.” Applied Energy134: 163-175. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy. 2014.08.021.
16.
DyckhoffH.AllenK. (2001). “Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA).” European Journal of Operational Research132(2): 312-325. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00154-5.
17.
E-Control. Energie-Control Austria fur die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft. Available from: http://ww-w.e-control.at/statistik, accessed 17February2016.
18.
FarrellM.J. (1957). “The measurement of productive efficiency.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society A.120: 253-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2343100.
19.
FareR.GrosskopfS.LovellC.A.K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency of production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
20.
FillerG.OdeningM.SeegerS.HahnJ. (2007). “Zur Effizienz von ;Biogasanlagen.” Berichte über Landwirtschaft85(2): 178-194. http://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Service/BerichteLandwirtschaft/2007_Heft2_Band85.pdf? __blob=publicationFile
21.
GreenR.YatchewA. (2012). “Support schemes for Renewable Energy: An Economic Analysis.” Economics of Energy &Environmental Policy1(2): 83-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.6
22.
HaarL.N.HaarL. (2017). “An Option Analysis of the European Union Renewable Energy Support Mechanism.” Economics of Energy &Environmental Policy6(1): 131-147. https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.6.1.lhaa.
23.
HuberP.J. (1981). Robust Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
24.
IEA (2016a). Renewables Information 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.
25.
IEA (2016b). World Energy Outlook 2016. Paris: International Energy Agency.
26.
KitzingL.MitchellC.MorthorstP.E. (2012). “Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging?” Energy Policy51: 192-201. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.064.
27.
KlessmannC.HeldA.RathmannM.RagwitzM. (2011). “Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union-What is needed to reach the 2020 targets?” Energy Policy39(12): 7637-7657. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.038.
28.
LatruffeL.MinvielJ.J. (2013). Explaining the impact of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency: Analytical challenges and Bayesian meta-analysis. Presented at 7. Journées de recherches en sciences sociales (JRSS), Angers, France. accessed February 9,2016. http://prodinra.inra.fr/record/274086.
29.
MadlenerR.AntunesC.DiasL. (2009). “Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research14(3-4): 49-53. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.051.
30.
MartinJ.P.PageJ.M.Jr. (1983). “The impact of subsidies on X-efficiency in LDC industry: theory and an empirical test.” The Review of Economics and Statistics65(4): 608-617. http://doi.org/10.2307/1935929.
31.
PortelaM.C.A.S.ThanassoulisE.SimpsonG. (2004). “Negative data in DEA: a directional distance function approach applied to bank branches.” Journal of the Operational Research Society55(10): 1111-1121. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601768.
32.
PöschlM.WardS.OwendeP. (2010). “Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways.” Applied Energy87(11): 3305-3321. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011.
33.
SahooB. K.LuptacikM.MahlbergB. (2011). “Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: An application.” European Journal of Operational Research215: 750-762. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.017.
34.
SkovsgaardL.Klinge JacobsenH. (2017). “Economies of scale in biogas production and the significance of flexible regulation.” Energy Policy101: 77-89. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.021.
35.
SimõesP.MarquesR.C. (2012). “On the economic performance of the waste sector. A literature review.” Journal of Environmental Management106: 40-47. http://doi.org/10.1016/jjenvman.2012.04.005.
36.
Statistics Austria. Energy Balance1970-2014; Vienna. accessed March 1,2016. http://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/energie_umwelt_innovation_mobilitaet/energie_und_umwelt/energie/energiebilanzen/index.html.
37.
TullockG. (1980). “Efficient Rent Seeking.” In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, G. Tollock, eds., Toward a Theory of the Rent Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97-112.
38.
WallaC.SchneebergerW. (2008). “The optimal size for biogas plants.” Biomass and Bioenergy32(6): 551-557. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.009.
39.
WilsonP.W. (1993). “Detecting Outliers in Deterministic Nonparametric Frontier Models with Multiple Outputs.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics11(3): 319-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1391956.
40.
WirthS.MarkardJ.TrufferB.RohracherH. (2013). “Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions8: 20-41. http://doi.org/10.1016j.eist.2013.06.002.
41.
World Bioenergy Association. Global Bioenergy Statistics 2016. accessed March 13,2017. http://www.worldbioenergy.org/uploads/WBA%20Global%20Bioenergy%20Statistics%202016.pdf.
42.
ZhangH.LiL.ZhouD.ZhouP. (2014). “Political connections, government subsidies and firm financial performance: Evidence from renewable energy manufacturing in China.” Renewable Energy63: 330-336. http://doi.org/10.1016j.renene.2013.09.029.
