The Mechanisms for Autonomous Energy Efficiency Increases: A Cointegration Analysis of the US Energy/GDP Ratio

Abstract

Many forecasts for energy use and carbon emissions assume that energy intensity will decline over time for reasons unrelated to energy prices, which are termed autonomous energy efficiency increases (AEEI). A cointegration analysis of a vector error correction model indicates that the types of fuels consumed, personal consumption expenditures spent on energy, and energy prices account for changes in the ratio of energy use to economic activity in the US between 1929 and 1999. Cointegration indicates that AEEI is associated with technical and/or structural changes which allow consumers to substitute oil, natural gas, and/or primary electricity for coal, and that shift energy use from final demand to intermediate sectors. Identifying the factors responsible for AEEI allows me to: (1) show that econometric efforts to measure technical change using a deterministic trend are inconsistent with economic theory and cannot be interpreted reliably; (2) show that modeling technical change with a deterministic trend may generate forecasts that overstate reductions in energy use and carbon emissions; and (3) test the observational record for the presence of price-induced technical change and its effect on economic growth. Together, the results indicate that current estimates for AEEI may overstate future reductions in energy use and that the economic impacts of policies to reduce energy use and slow emissions may have a greater effect on economic growth than anticipated currently.

Keywords

Energy efficiency AEEI climate change cointegration VECM US

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

F.G.

Miovic

(1968). “On relative fuel efficiency and the output elasticity of energy consumption in western Europe.” Journal of Industrial Economics 17: 41-56.

Akaike

(1973). “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle.” In B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, eds., 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Akademini Kiado, Budapest, pp. 267-281.

Azar

Dowlatabadi

(1999). “A review of technical change in assessment of climate policy.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24: 513-544.

Burniaux

J-M

Nicletti

Oliveira-Martins

(1992). “GREEN: a global model for quantifying the costs of policies to curb CO2 emissions.” OECD Economic Studies 19: 49-92.

Clark

J.S.

Youngblood

C.E.

(1992). “Estimating duality models with biased technical change: a time series approach.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74: 353-360.

Cleveland

C.J.

Costanza

Hall

C.A.S.

Kaufmann

(1984). “Energy and the United States economy: A biophysical perspective.” Science 225:890-897.

Cleveland

C.J.

Kaufmann

R. K.

Stern

D. I.

(2000). “The Aggregation of Energy and Materials in Economic Indicators of Sustainability: Thermodynamic, Biophysical, and Economic Approaches.” Ecological Economics. 32: 301-317.

Dickey

D. A.

Fuller

W. A.

(1979). “Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427-431.

Edmonds

J.A.

Riley

J.M.

(1985). Global Energy: Assessing the Future Oxford University Press. New York.

10.

Engle

R.F.

Granger

C.W.J.

(1987). “Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing.” Econometrica 55: 251-276.

11.

Gately

(1992). “Imperfect price-reversibility of US gasoline demand: asymmetric responses to price increases and declines.” The Energy Journal 13(4): 179-207.

12.

Goulder

L.H.

Schneider

S.H.

(1999). “Induced technical change and he attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies.” Resource and Energy Economics 21: 211-253.

13.

Granger

C.W.J.

(1969). “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral models.” Econometrica 37: 424-38.

14.

Granger

C. W. J.

Newbold

(1974). “Spurious regressions in econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 2: 111-120.

15.

Greenslade

J.V.

Hall

S.G.

Henry

S.G.B.

(1997). “On the identification of cointegrated systems in small samples: practical procedures with an application to UK wages and prices.” London Business School Mimeo.

16.

Hansen

Juselius

(1995). CATS in RATS: Cointegration Analysis of Time Series, Estima.

17.

Hamilton

J.D.

(1983). “Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II.” Journal of Political Economy. 91: 228-248.

18.

Hannon

(1982). “Analysis of energy costs of economic activities: 1963-2000.” Energy Systems and Policy. 6: 249-278.

19.

Hogan

Jorgenson

(1991). Productivity trends and the cost of reducing CO2 emissions. The Energy Journal 12(1): 67-85.

20.

Johansen

(1988). “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 12: 231-254.

21.

Johansen

Juselius

(1990). “Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 52:169-209.

22.

Kaufmann

R. K.

(1992). “A Biophysical analysis of the energy/real GDP ratio: implications for substitution and technical change.” Ecological Economics. 6(1): 3556.

23.

Kaufmann

R.K.

(1994). “The relation between marginal product and price in US energy markets: Implications for climate change policy.“ Energy Economics. 16(2):145-158.

24.

Lim

Shumway

C.R.

(1997). technical change and model specification: Us agricultural production American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 543-554.

25.

MacKinnon

J.G.

(1994). “Approximate Asymptotic Distribution Functions for Unit-Root and Cointegration Tests.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12: 427-431.

26.

MacKinnon

J.G.

(1991). “Critical values for cointegration tests.” In Advanced Texts in Ecnometrics C.W.J. Granger and G.E. Mizon, eds. Oxford University Press pp.267-276.

27.

Manne

A.R.

Richels

. (1999). “The Kyoto Protocol: a cost effective strategy for meeting environmental objectives.” The Energy Journal Special Issue; The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A multi-model evaluation.

28.

Manne

Richels

. (1992). Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emission Limits. The MIT press, Cambridge, MA.

29.

Nordhaus

(1994). Managing the Global Commons. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

30.

Osterwald-Lenum

(1992). “A note with quantiles of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 54:461-471.

31.

Pesaran

M.H.

Shin

(1994). “Long run structural modeling.” University of Cambridge, Mimeo.

32.

Popp

(2002). “Induced innovation and energy prices.” American Economic Review 92(1): 160-80.

33.

Schmalensee

Stocker

T.M.

Judson

R.A.

(1998). “World carbon emissions: 1950-2050.” Review of Economics and Statistics 80(1): 15-27.

34.

Stern

D.I.

(2000). “A multivariate cointegration analysis of the role of energy in the US macroeconomy.” Energy Economics 22: 267-283.

35.

Stock

J.H.

(1987). “Asymptotic properties of least squares estimators of co-integrating vectors.” Econometrica 55: 1035-1056.

36.

US Department of Commerce (Various years). Survey of Current Business, Economic Report to the President, National Income and Product Accounts, and Historical Statistics of the United States. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

37.

US Department of Energy (Various years). Annaual Energy Review. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

38.

Zarnikau

(1999). “Will tomorrow's energy efficiency indices prove useful in economic studies?” The Energy Journal 20(3):139-145.