This paper presents a simple method for incorporating the time required for new technology to penetrate the market and subsequently substitute for an old one when evaluating the ability of new energy technology to impact global climate change. The methodology is applied to the two largest sources of energyrelated carbon dioxide: electricity generation and motor vehicles. Carbon-free road transportation is hypothesized to substitute for petroleum-fueled vehicles and carbon-free electric power generation for fossil-fueled electricity based on empirical analogs for substitution dynamics parameters, beginning in the year 2000. The examples imply that near-term significant reductions to 1990 carbon emissions levels via technology substitution are unlikely. The time scale relevant for realizing reductions in carbon emissions is several times the expected lifetime of the products that new technology is intended to replace.
AustinD. (1997). Climate Protection Policies: Can We Afford to Delay? World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
2.
AusubelJ.MarchettiC. (1996). “Elektron: Electrical Systems in Retrospect and Prospect.” Daedelus125(3): 139-169.
3.
BassF.M. (1969). “A New Product Growth Model for Consumer Durables.” Management Science15(5): 215-227.
4.
BeaverR. (1992). A Structural Comparison of Models Used in EMF 12 to Analyze the Costs of Policies for Reducing Energy-Sector CO2 Emissions. EMF Forum Working Paper WP 12.28, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
5.
de VriesB.JanssenM. (1996). Global Energy: An Integrated Perspective with the TIME Model. GLOBO report series No. 17, RIVM, Bilthoven.
6.
EDMC (1997). The Energy Data and Modelling Center: The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan. 97 Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics in Japan. The Energy Conservation Center, Japan.
7.
FisherJ.C.PryR.H. (1971). “A Simple Substitution Model for Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change3: 75-88.
8.
FrischJ.-R. (1986). Future Stresses for Energy Resources. London: Graham & Trotman.
9.
GrüblerA. (1990). The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures: Dynamics of Evolution & Change in Transport. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
10.
GrubbM. (1997). “Technologies, Energy Systems and the Timing of CO2, Emissions Abatement.” Energy Policy25(2): 159-172.
11.
IPCC (1996). WatsonT. (eds). Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
KendallD.L.CatesS.C. (1991). Market Penetration of New Technologies, Programs and Services. EPRI Report CU-7011, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
13.
KnappK.E. (1997). Exploring Energy Substitution for Reducing Atmospheric Carbon Emissions. EPRI RP-8075, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
14.
LuenbergerD. (1979). Introduction to Dynamic Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
MahajanV.MullerE. (1993). “New Product Diffusion Models,” in Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science. Eliashberg & Lilien, North-Holland, Amsterdam. 5: 349-408.
16.
ManneA.RichelsR. (1992). Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO2, Emission Limits. Cambridge, MA:: The MIT Press.
17.
MansfieldE. (1961). “Technical Change and the Rate of Imitation.” Econometrica29(4): 741-766.
18.
MarchettiC. (1989). “How to Solve the CO2, Problem without Tears.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy14(8): 493-506.
19.
MarchettiC.NakicenovicN. (1979). The Dynamics of Energy Systems and the Logistic Substitution Model, RR-79-13, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
20.
NakicenovicN. (1986). “The Automobile Road to Technological Change: Diffusion of the Automobile as a Process of Technological Substitution.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change29(4): 309-340
21.
NordhausW.PoppD. (1997). “What is the Value of Scientific Knowledge? An Application to Global Warming Using the PRICE Model.” The Energy Journal18(1): 1-45.
22.
OECD/IEA (1996). International Energy Agency. Energy Statistics & Balances of Non-OECD Countries 1993-94. Paris: OECD.
23.
StarrC., (1992). “Energy Sources: A Realistic Outlook.” Science256: 981-987.
24.
StarrC. (1993). “Global Energy and Electricity Futures.” Energy18(3): 225-237.
25.
U.S. Department of Energy (1997). “Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions, Potential Impacts of Energy Technologies by 2010 and Beyond.” Prepared by the Interlaboratory Working Group on Energy-Efficient and Low-Carbon Technologies for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
26.
WenneC.-O. (1995). Energy-Economy Analysis: Linking the Macroeconomic and Systems-Engineering Approaches, WP-95-42. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.
