Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper investigates input biasing characteristics of technology, environmental compliance, and changing energy prices. In particular we wish to investigate whether input biases of technology and environmental compliance are induced by changes in relative fuel prices, or whether there are price induced technology and environmental compliance biases. Using a two-stage optimization, we estimate a truncated third-order translog model by its associated (second order) cost share equations. The model uses two-digit SIC data panel for the period 1974 -1991. We find evidence of significant fuel-saving technological bias, while environmental compliance has been significantly fossilfuel using. The results indicate that technology and environmental compliance biases are, in part, induced by changes in relative fuel prices and such induced biases are mainly fuel saving. Finally, our demand elasticity estimates indicate that industrial demand for most fossil fuels and purchased electricity is significantly price inelastic. Policy implications of these results are also briefly discussed.

Keywords

Energy prices Environmental policy Technology change panel data translog model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berndt

E.R.

(1991). The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary, Massachusetts: Addison- Wesley Publishing Company.

Considine

T.J.

(1989). “Separability, Functional Form and Regulatory Policy in Models of Interfuel Substitution,” Energy Economics 11(1): 82-94.

Fuss

Melvyn A.

(1977). “The Demand for Energy In Canadian Manufacturing.” Journal of Econometrics (5): 89-116.

Gollop

F.M.

Roberts

M.J.

(1983). “Environmental Regulations and Productivity growth: The Case of Fossil Fueled Electric Power Plants,” Journal of Political Economy 91(4): 654-674.

Jorgenson

D.W.

Fraumeni

B.M.

(1981). “Relative Prices and Technical Change,” in Berndt

Ernest R.

Field

Barry C.

eds., Modeling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 17-47.

Matsukawa

Fuji

Madono

(1993). “Price, Environmental Regulation, and Fuel Demand: Econometric Estimates for Japanese Manufacturing Industries,” The Energy Journal 14(4): 37-56.

Pindyck

R.S.

(1979). “Inter-fuel Substitution And the Industrial Demand for Energy: An International Comparison.” Review of Economics and Statistics 61: 169-179.

SAS Institute Inc . (1990). SAS/ETS User Guide, Version 6 Edition. Cary, NC:SAS Institute Inc., 1990.

Stevenson

(1980). “Measuring Technological Bias,” American Economic Review 70 (March): 162-73.

10.

Taheri

A.A.

(1994). “Oil Shocks and the Dynamics of Substitution Adjustments of Industrial Fuels in the U.S.” Applied Economics 26(8): 751-756.

11.

TSP International, Version 4.5, Palo Alto, CA, 1999.

12.

U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Manufactures and the Annual Survey of Manufactures, various Issues,

1974-1981.

13.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures,

1980-1993.

14.

U.S. Department of Energy, Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey , 1985, 1988, 1991.

15.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Supplement A to Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I, AP-42, October 1986.

16.

Zellner

(1962). “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations and the Test for Aggregation Bias.” American Statistical Association Journal 57( June): 348-368.

Energy Price,Environmental Policy,and Technological Bias

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References