In this paper we estimate two models for interfuel substitution between electricity, district heating and (other) fuels using a micro panel data set containing information for most Danish industrial companies in the period between 1983 and 1997. The main finding of the study is that interfuel substitution is low within the companies, especially between electricity and other fuels. The partial own-price elasticities estimated are small (between -0.04 and -0.13) both for electricity and other fuels, while it is between -0.44 and -0.50 for district heating. The partial own-price elasticity for electricity is smaller than generally found in macro studies. One explanation may be that the macro studies, in addition to technical substitution, capture some derived demand effect (i.e., aggregation bias).
AndersenF.M.TrierP. (1995). Environmental Satellite Models for ADAM. C02, S02 and NOx emissions. NERI Technical Report No. 148, Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy, National Environmental Research Institute.
2.
AtkinsonJ.ManningN. (1995). “A Survey of International Energy Elasticities”. In BarkerT.EkinsP.JohnstoneN.eds., Global Warming and Energy Demand. London: Routledge. Baltagi, B.H. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: John Wiley and Son.
3.
BjørnerT.B.JensenH.H. (2001). “Energy Taxes, Voluntary Agreements and Investment Subsidies - a micro-panel analysis of the effect on Danish industrial companies’ energy demand.” Resource and Energy Economics (forthcoming).
4.
BjørnerT.B.TogebyM.JensenH.H. (2001). “Industrial Companies’ Demand for Electricity: Evidence from a Micro Panel.” Energy Economics23(5): 595-617.
5.
BousquetA.IvaldiM. (1998). “An Individual Choice Model of Energy Mix.” Resource and Energy Economics20: 263-286.
6.
BränlundR.LundgrenT. (2001). A Dynamic Analysis of Interfuel Substitution for Swedish Heating Plants. Paper presented at the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (EAERE) Conference in Southampton, UK.
7.
ChristensenL.R.JorgensonD.W.LauL.J. (1973). “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers.” The Review of Economics and Statistics55: 28-45.
8.
ConsidineT.J. (1989a). “Separability, Functional Form and Regulatory Policy in Models of Interfuel Substitution”. Energy Economics 11(2): 82-94.
9.
ConsidineT.J. (1989b). “Estimating the Demand for Energy and Natural Resource Inputs: Trade-Offs in Global Properties.” Applied Economics21(7): 931-45.
10.
ConsidineT.J. (1990). “Symmetry Constraints and Variable Returns to Scale in Logit Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics8(3): 347-53.
11.
ConsidineT.J.MountT.D. (1984). “The Use of Linear Logit Models for Dynamic Input Demand Systems.” Review of Economics and Statistics66(3): 434-43.
12.
DomsM.E.DunneT. (1993). Energy Intensity, Electricity Consumption, and Advanced Manufacturing Technology Usage. Bureau of the Census Centre for Economic Studies, Discussion Paper: CES 93-9, July.
13.
ElkhafifM.A.T. (1992). “Estimated Disaggregated Price Elasticities in Industrial Energy Demand. ” The Energy Journal 13(4): 209-217.
14.
FussM.A. (1977). “The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing - An example of the Estimation of Production Structures with many Inputs.” Journal of Econometrics5: 89-116.
15.
HalvorsenR.(1977). “Energy Substitution in U.S. Manufacturing.” Review of Economics and Statistics59(4): 381-88.
16.
JonesC.T. (1995). “A Dynamic Analysis of Interfuel Substitution in U.S. Industrial Energy Demand.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics13(4): 459-65.
17.
KleijwegA.Van LeeuwenG.HuigenR.ZeelenbergK. (1989). The Demand for Energy in Dutch Manufacturing; A Study Using Panel Data of Individual Firms, 1978-1986. Research Paper 8906, Research Institute for Small and Medium-sized Business in the Netherlands, Department of Fundamental Research.
18.
LeeL.-F.PittM. (1987). “Microeconometric Models of Rationing, Imperfect Markets, and Non-negativity Constraints.” Journal of Econometrics36: 89-110.
19.
LynkE.K. (1989). The Demand for Energy by U.K. Manufacturing Industry. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies 57(1): 1-16.
20.
MagnusJ.R.WoodlandA.D. (1987). “Inter-fuel Substitution in Dutch Manufacturing.” Applied Economics19: 1639-1664.
21.
PindyckR.S. (1979). “Interfuel Substitution and the Industrial Demand for Energy: An International Comparison.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2): 169-79.
22.
SolowJ.L. (1987). “The Capital Energy Complementarity Debate Revisited.” American Economic Review77: 605-14.
23.
TurnovskyM.FolieMUlphA. (1982). “Factor Substitutability in Australian Manufacturing with Emphasis on Energy Inputs.” Economic Record58(160): 61-72.
24.
WoodlandAlan D. (1993). “A Micro-econometric Analysis of the Industrial Demand for Energy in NSW.” The Energy Journal14(2): 57-89.
