The paper presents a simplified model of the form often used to project long-term emissions of carbon dioxide from energy production and use. It then considers three uncertainties in parameters of the model concerning (a) the rate of improvement in energy efficiency, (b) the costs of environmental damage, and (c) the rate of technical progress in the development and use of technologies for abating C02 emissions. Monte Carlo analysis is used to estimate the frequency distributions of costs and benefits under different policy assumptions. The results suggest that the possibilities of an economic surprise cannot be ruled out and that 'technology policies' to support the development of non-carbon technologies directly are robust under uncertainty. Such policies can also be defended by reference to their option value, to their environmental benefits, and to the positive externalities of innovation.
Anderson D. (1997). “Renewable Energy Technology and Policy for Development.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment22: 187-215.
2.
AndersonD.BirdC.D. (1992). “Carbon accumulations and technical progress-a simulation study of costs.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics54(1): 1-29.
3.
AndersonD.WilliamsR.H. (1993). “The Cost Effectiveness of GEF Projects, Global Environment Facility.” Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility/World Bank.
4.
AndersonD. (2001). “Technical Progress and Pollution Abatement—An economic view of selected technologies and practices.” Environment and Development Economics forthcoming). (The draft of the paper can be found on the web site of the Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology. www. iccept.ic.ac.uk).
5.
ArrowK. J. (1962). “The economic implications of learning-by-doing.” Review of Economic Studies29: 155-173.
6.
AzarChristianDowlatabadiHadi (1999). “A Review of Technical Change in Assessment of Climate Policy.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment24: 513-44.
7.
BatesR.W.MooreE.A. (1992). “Commercial Energy and the Environment,” Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Environmental Policy and Research Division.
8.
BaumolW.J. (1995). “Environmental Industries with Substantial Start-up Costs as Contributors to Trade Competitiveness.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment20: 71-81.
9.
BohmP. (1999). “An emission quota trade experiment among four Nordic countries,” in SorrellS.SkeaJ.(Eds), Pollution for Sale: Emissions Trading and Joint Implementation.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
10.
CavendishWAndersonD.(1994). “Efficiency and Substitution in Pollution Abatement.” Oxford Economic Papers46: 774-799.
11.
BollenJohannesGielenArjenTimmerHans (1999). “Clubs, Ceilings and CDM: Macroeconomics of Compliance with the Kyoto Protocol.” The Energy Journal,Special Issue on The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation: 177-206.
12.
ChakravortyU.RoumassetJ.TseK. (1997). “Endogenous Substitution Among Energy Resources and Global Warming.” Journal of Political Economy105(6).
13.
ChristianssonL(1995). “Diffusion and Learning Curves of Renewable Energy Technologies.” IIASA Working Paper WP-95-126.
14.
CodyG.D.TiedjeT. (1992). “The Potential for Utility-Scale Photovoltaic Technology in Developing Countries,” inAhlelesB.JacobsonA.J.ShengP. (Eds), Energy and the Environment.London/NJ: New Scientific.
15.
DargayJ.GatelyD. (1995). “The Response of World Energy and Oil Demand to Income Growth and Changes in Oil Prices.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment20: 145-78.
16.
DixitA.K.PindyckR.S. (1994). Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
EIA (1998). Energy Information Administration/International Energy Outlook 1998, Department of the Environment, Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC.
18.
Fankhauser S. (1995). Valuing Climate Change. The Economics of the Greenhouse.London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
19.
GrubbM.EdmundsJ.tenP.Brinkten P.MorrisonM.(1993). “The costs of limiting fossil-fuel C02 emission: A survey and analysis.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment18: 397-478.
20.
HopeC.MaulP. (1996). “Valuing the Impact of C02 Emissions.” Energy Policy24(3): 211-219.
21.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (1997). Photovoltaic Power Systems in Selected IEA Member Countries: A Survey Report, Paris: OECD/IEA.
22.
IEA (2000). Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy. Paris: OECD/IEA.
23.
IPCC (1995). Climate Change 1995. Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
IPCC (1998). Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change: Draft Special Reports on Emission Scenarios. Lead authors meeting. Washington DC, April 29-30.
25.
JohanssonT.B.KellyH.ReddyA.K.N.WilliamsR.H. (1993). Renewable Energy: Sources for Fuels and Electricity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
26.
JudsonR.A.SchmalenseeR.StokerT.M. (1999). “Economic Development and the Structure of the Demand for Commercial Energy.” The Energy Journal20(2): 29-57.
27.
KasslerP. (1994). “Energy for Development,” Shell Selected Papers. London, UK: Shell Group of Companies.
28.
KempR. (1997). Environmental Policy and Technical Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
29.
KnappK.E. (1999). “Exploring Energy Technology Substitution for Reducing Atmospheric Carbon Emissions.” The Energy Journal20(2): 121-143.
30.
GrublerA.NakicenovicN.VictorD. G. (1999). “Modelling Technical Change: Implications for the Global Environment.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment24: 545-69.
31.
EdmundsJaeClarkeJ. F. (1998). “A Global Energy Strategy to Address Climate Change.” A Report by the Battelle Pacific Nothwest Laboratories: Washington, DC.
32.
LaveLester B. (1991). “Formulating Greenhouse Policies in a Sea of Uncertainty.” Ihe Energy Journal, Special Issue on Global Warming, 12(1): 9-21.
33.
MacCrackenChristopher N.EdmondsJames A.KimSon HSandsRonald D.(1999). “The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol.” The Energy Journal, Special Issue on The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation: 25-71.
34.
ManneAlan S.RichelsRichard G. (1999). “The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives?” The Energy Journal,Special Issue on The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation: 1-23.
35.
McDonaldAlanSchrattenholzerLeo (2001). “Learning Rates for Energy Technologies.” Energy Policy29: 255-261.
36.
NakicenovicN.GrublerandA.McDonaldA.(1998). Global Energy Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
NakicenovicN.VictorN.MoritaT. (1998). “Emissions Scenarios Database and Review of Scenarios.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change3: 95-120.
38.
NeijLena (1997). “Use of Experience Curves to Analyse the Prospects for the Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology.” Energy Policy23(13): 1099-1107.
39.
NordhausW.D.PoppD. (1999). “What is the Value of Scientific Knowledge? An Application to Global Warming Using the PRICE Model.” The Energy Journal18(1): 1-45.
40.
NordhausW.D.BoyerJoseph G. (1999). “Requiem for Kyoto: An Economic Analysis of the Kyoto Protocol.” The Energy Journal,Special Issue on The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation: 93-130.
41.
OgdenJ.M. (1999). “Prospects for Building a Hydrogen Energy Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment24: 227-79.
42.
PapathanasiouD. (1998). Evaluation of Risk and Uncertainty in Energy Policy and Global Warming using Computer Simulation and Monte Carlo Analysis MSc Thesis, Imperial College, London.
43.
RannelsJ.E. (1998). “The Activities of the US Department of Energy to Advance Photovoltaic Energy Conversion,” in BoerK.W.(Ed) Advances in Solar Energy, (12). Boulder, CO: American Solar Energy Society.
44.
RuttanVernon W. (2001). Technology Growth and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
SocolowR.E. (1997). Fuels Decarbonisation and Carbon Sequestration: Report of a Workshop, PU/CEES Report no. 302. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Center for Energy and Environmental Studies..
46.
SrinivasanS.MosdaleR.StevensP.YangC. (1999). “Fuel Cells: Reaching the Era of Clean and Efficient Power Generation in the Twenty-First Century.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment24: 281-328.
47.
TolR.S.J. (1999). “The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” The Energy Journal20(1): 61-81.
48.
TsuchiyaH. (1992). “Photovoltaics Cost Analysis Based on the Learning Curve.” Tokyo: Research Institute for Systems Technology.
49.
U.S. President's Committee of Advisers on Science and Technology .(1997). Report to the President on Federal Energy Research and Development for the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century, Executive Office of the President of the United States: Washington, DC.
50.
U.S. President's Committee of Advisers on Science and Technology (1999). Powerful Partnerships: The Federal Role in International Cooperation on Energy Innovation, Executive Office of the President of the United States: Washington, DC.
51.
Vander Zwaan,B.C.C.GelaghR.KlaassenG.SchrattenholzerL.(2001). “Endogenous Technological Change in Climate Change Modelling” Energy Economics (forthcoming).
52.
WeyantJ.P. (1993). “Costs of Reducing Global Carbon Emissions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives7(4): 27-46.
53.
WeyantJ.P.HillJennifer N. (1999). “Introduction and Overview.” The Energy Journal. Special issue on The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation: i - xliv.
54.
World Bank (1992), World Development Report: Development and the Environment.Washington, DC: World Bank.
