Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-7
Mapping the Influence of European Environmental Policies Toward Climate Neutrality Progress: A Quantile Analysis of Green Technologies and Policy Effectiveness
The diverse performance asymmetries and policy efforts toward climate neutrality among EU member states remain underexplored. Addressing this gap, we develop a conceptual framework to analyze the influence of green policy effectiveness and green technologies across tiers of emissions’ productivity in the EU-28 during 2010 to 2019, a pivotal period for climate neutrality efforts. Results from an instrumental panel quantile estimator reveal that national climate policies have an asymmetric impact toward climate neutrality progress, particularly benefiting low-performing countries. Green fiscal policy, such as energy taxes, is not a precondition for climate neutrality. We highlight the unexplored role of environmental policy performance, finding that effective policy auditing fostering progress. Eco-innovation and clean energy influence progress across tiers, underscoring the need for targeted incentives. Green technology development proves to be a key contributor toward climate neutrality progress, across tiers. This study advances understanding of the SDGs 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, and 16.
AbbasS.SaqibN.MohammedK. S.SahoreN.ShahzadU.2024. “Pathways towards Carbon Neutrality in Low Carbon Cities: The Role of Green Patents, R&D and Energy Use for Carbon Emissions.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change200: 123109. doi:10.1016/j.techfore. 2023.123109.
2.
AkramR.ChenF.KhalidF.YeZ.MajeedM. T.2020. “Heterogeneous Effects of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy on Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Developing Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production247: 119122.
3.
AlbulescuC. T.TiwariA. K.YoonS. M.KangS. H.2019. “FDI, Income, and Environmental Pollution in Latin America: Replication and Extension Using Panel Quantiles Regression Analysis.”Energy Economics84: 104504.
4.
Amankwah-AmoahJ.ChenX.WangX.KhanZ.ChenJ.2019. “Overcoming Institutional Voids as a Pathway to Becoming Ambidextrous: The Case of China’s Sichuan Telecom.”Long Range Planning52 (4): 101871.
5.
Amankwah-AmoahJ.KhanZ.WoodG.2021. “COVID-19 and Business Failures: The Paradoxes of Experience, Scale, and Scope for Theory and Practice.”European Management Journal39 (2): 179–84.
AtallaT.BeanP.2017. “Determinants of Energy Productivity in 39 Countries: An Empirical Investigation.”Energy Economics62: 217–29.
8.
AydinC.EsenÖ.2018. “Reducing CO2 Emissions in the EU Member States: Do Environmental Taxes Work?Journal of Environmental Planning and Management61 (13): 2396–420.
Belmonte-UreñaL. J.Plaza-ÚbedaJ. A.Vazquez-BrustD.YakovlevaN.2021. “Circular Economy, Degrowth and Green Growth as Pathways for Research on Sustainable Development Goals: A Global Analysis and Future Agenda.”Ecological Economics185: 107050.
11.
BorozanD.2019. “Unveiling the Heterogeneous Effect of Energy Taxes and Income on Residential Energy Consumption.”Energy Policy129: 13–22.
ChangM. C.YuC. H.2017. “Estimation of Energy Productivity Change in Baltic Sea and EU Non-Baltic Sea States.”Baltic Journal of Economics17 (1): 78–102.
14.
ChatzistamoulouN.2023. “Is Digital Transformation the Deus ex Machina Towards Sustainability Transition of the European SMEs?”Ecological Economics206: 107739.
15.
ChatzistamoulouN.KoundouriP.2021. “SDGs Patterns across the Globe: From Theory to Practice.” In Decent Work and Economic Growth, edited by FilhoW. LealAzulA. M.BrandliL.SalviaA. LangeWallT., 859–70. Springer International Publishing.
16.
ChatzistamoulouN.KoundouriP.2024. “Is Green Transition in Europe Fostered by Energy and Environmental Efficiency Feedback Loops? The Role of Eco-Innovation, Renewable Energy and Green Taxation.”Environmental and Resource Economics87 (6): 1445–72. doi:10.1007/s10640-024-00849-y.
17.
ChatzistamoulouN.KounetasK.2023. “Tracing Green Growth through Industrial Resource Efficiency Patterns: The Role of Competitiveness and Clean Technologies.”Managerial and Decision Economics44 (7): 4011–4026.
18.
ChatzistamoulouN.KounetasK.TsekourasK.2019. “Energy Efficiency, Productive Performance and Heterogeneous Competitiveness Regimes. Does the Dichotomy Matter?”Energy Economics81: 687–97.
19.
ChatzistamoulouN.TyllianakisE.2022a. “Commitment of European SMEs to Resource Efficiency Actions to Achieve Sustainability Transition. A Feasible Reality or an Elusive Goal?”Journal of Environmental Management321: 115937.
20.
ChatzistamoulouN.TyllianakisE.2022b. “Green Growth & Sustainability Transition through Information. Are the Greener Better Informed? Evidence from European SMEs.”Journal of Environmental Management306: 114457.
21.
ChengC.RenX.DongK.DongX.WangZ.2021. “How Does Technological Innovation Mitigate CO2 Emissions in OECD Countries? Heterogeneous Analysis Using Panel Quantile Regression.”Journal of Environmental Management280: 111818.
22.
CoadA.RaoR.2011. “The Firm-Level Employment Effects of Innovations in High-Tech US Manufacturing Industries.”Journal of Evolutionary Economics21: 255–83.
23.
CrecenteF.SarabiaM.Teresa del ValM.2021. “Climate Change Policy and Entrepreneurial Opportunities.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change163: 120446.
24.
DengW.KharuddinS.Mohd AshhariZ.2024. “Green Finance Transforms Developed Countries’ Green Growth: Mediating Effect of Clean Technology Innovation and Threshold Effect of Environmental Tax.”Journal of Cleaner Production448: 141642.
European Central Bank (ECB). 2021. “Climate Change and Monetary Policy in the Euro Area.” No 271/September 2021, Occasional Paper Series. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2866/101932.
27.
European Commission. 2009. “Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (Text with EEA relevance).”https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/28/oj/eng.
European Commission. 2011a. “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe.” /* COM/2011/0571 final */. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0571.
30.
European Commission. 2011b. “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Innovation for a Sustainable Future - The Eco-innovation Action Plan (Eco-AP).” /* COM/2011/0899 final */. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A52011DC0899.
31.
European Commission. 2014a. “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030.” /* COM/2014/015 final */. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A52014DC0015.
32.
European Commission. 2014b. “Decision No 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on a General Union Environment Action Programme to 2020 ‘Living Well, within the Limits of Our Planet’ Text with EEA Relevance.”https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013D1386.
33.
European Commission. 2015b. “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE, THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS AND THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy.” /* COM/2015/080 final */. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0080.
34.
European Commission. 2016. “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE, THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS AND THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK Clean Energy for All Europeans.”https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0860
35.
European Commission. 2018a. “Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources (Recast).” In Official Journal of the European Union (Issue L 328). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/oj/eng.
36.
European Commission. 2018b. “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE, THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS AND THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK A Clean Planet for All A European Strategic Long-Term Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate Neutral Economy.” COM/2018/773 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773.
European Commission. 2021a. Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, pp. 1–17). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/european-climate-law.html
40.
European Commission. 2021b. “COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS ‘Fit for 55’: Delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality.” COM/2021/550 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0550.
GrinJ.RotmansJ.SchotJ.2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
GuptaS.TirpakD. A.BurgerN.GuptaJ.HöhneN.BonchevaA. I.KanoanG. M., et al. 2007. “Policies, Instruments and Co-operative Arrangements.” In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave.]
47.
HeM.AbbasiB. N.FanZ.2024. “Education and Technological Innovation in Mitigating CO2 Emissions and Fostering Green Economic Growth in China: Marginal Effects and Policy Threshold Analyses.”Journal of Environmental Management370: 122786. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122786.
48.
HerzerD.2022. “The Impact on Domestic CO2 Emissions of Domestic Government-Funded Clean Energy R&D and of Spillovers from Foreign Government-Funded Clean Energy R&D.”Energy Policy168: 113126. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113126.
Jakučionytė-SkodienėM.LiobikienėG.2023. “Changes in Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in the Lithuanian Household Sector Caused by Environmental Awareness and Climate Change Policy.”Energy Policy180: 113687. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301421523002720.
52.
KruseT.DechezleprêtreA.SaffarR.RobertL.2022. “Measuring Environmental Policy Stringency in OECD Countries: An Update of the OECD Composite EPS Indicator.” OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1703 (Issue 1703). doi:10.1787/90ab82e8-en.
53.
LiJ.DongK.DongX.2022. “Green Energy as a New Determinant of Green Growth in China: The Role of Green Technological Innovation.”Energy Economics114: 106260.
54.
LisciandraM.MigliardoC.2017. “An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corruption on Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data.”Environmental and Resource Economics68: 297–318. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10640-016-0019-1.
55.
LiuH.WangY.ShiX.PangL.2022. “How Do Environmental Policies Affect Capital Market Reactions? Evidence from China’s Construction Waste Treatment Policy.”Ecological Economics198: 107461.
56.
MahmoodN.ZhaoY.LouQ.GengJ.2022. “Role of Environmental Regulations and Eco-innovation in Energy Structure Transition for Green Growth: Evidence from OECD.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change183: 121890.
57.
MaitiM.2022. “Does Development in Venture Capital Investments Influence Green Growth?”Technological Forecasting and Social Change182: 121878.
58.
MarkardJ.RavenR.TrufferB.2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects.”Research Policy41(6): 955–67.
59.
MehboobM. Y.MaB.MehboobM. B.ZhangY.2023. “Does Green Finance Reduce Environmental Degradation? The Role of Green Innovation, Environmental Tax, and Geopolitical Risk in China.”Journal of Cleaner Production435: 140353. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140353.
60.
MensahC. N.LongX.DaudaL.BoamahK. B.SalmanM.Appiah-TwumF.TachieA. K.2019. “Technological Innovation and Green Growth in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Economies.”Journal of Cleaner Production240: 118204. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118204.
61.
NæssJ. S.HuX.GveinM. H.IordanC. M.CavalettO.DorberM.GirouxB.CherubiniF.2023. “Climate Change Mitigation Potentials of Biofuels Produced from Perennial Crops and Natural Regrowth on Abandoned and Degraded Cropland in Nordic Countries.”Journal of Environmental Management325: 116474.
ParkM. S.BleischwitzR.HanK. J.JangE. K.JooJ. H.2017. “Eco-Innovation Indices as Tools for Measuring Eco-Innovation.”Sustainability9 (12): 2206.
64.
PhamS. D.NguyenT. T. T.DoH. X.2024. “Impact of Climate Policy Uncertainty on Return Spillover among Green Assets and Portfolio Implications.”Energy Economics134: 107631.
65.
PovitkinaM.AlvaradoN.DalliC. M.2021. “QoG Environmental Indicators Dataset 2021.” University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute (QoG). https://www.gu.se/en/quality-government.
66.
PowellD.2020. “Quantile Treatment Effects in the Presence of Covariates.”Review of Economics and Statistics102 (5): 994–1005.
67.
PowellD.2022. “Quantile Regression with Nonadditive Fixed Effects.”Empirical Economics63 (5): 2675–91.
RenX.LiJ.HeF.LuceyB.2023. “Impact of Climate Policy Uncertainty on Traditional Energy and Green Markets: Evidence from Time-Varying Granger Tests.”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews173: 113058.
70.
SafiA.ChenY.WahabS.ZhengL.RjoubH.2021. “Does Environmental Taxes Achieve the Carbon Neutrality Target of G7 Economies? Evaluating the Importance of Environmental R&D.”Journal of Environmental Management293: 112908. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112908.
71.
SalviaM.PietrapertosaF.D’AlonzoV.Clerici MaestosiP.SimoesS. G.ReckienD.2023. “Key Dimensions of Cities’ Engagement in the Transition to Climate Neutrality.”Journal of Environmental Management344: 118519. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118519.
ŞekerM.YangJ. S.2014. “Bribery Solicitations and Firm Performance in the Latin America and Caribbean Region.”Journal of Comparative Economics42 (1): 246–64.
74.
ShahbazM.PatelN.DuA. M.AhmadS.2024. “From Black to Green: Quantifying the Impact of Economic Growth, Resource Management, and Green Technologies on CO2 Emissions.”Journal of Environmental Management360: 121091. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121091.
75.
SharmaS.SinghR. K.MishraR.SubramanianN.2024. “Developing Climate Neutrality among Supply Chain Members in Metal and Mining Industry: Natural Resource-Based View Perspective.”International Journal of Logistics Management35 (3): 804–832. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLM-03-2023-0108/full/html.
76.
ShiH.QiaoY.ShaoX.WangP.2019. “The Effect of Pollutant Charges on Economic and Environmental Performances: Evidence from Shandong Province in China.”Journal of Cleaner Production232: 250–56.
77.
SunG.FangJ.LiT.AiY.2024. “Effects of Climate Policy Uncertainty on Green Innovation in Chinese Enterprises. International Review of Financial Analysis91: 102960.
UngerB.NippaM.2024. “Determinants of Firms’ Initiative and Inertia in Pursuing Climate Neutrality Strategies—Theoretical Explanations and Empirical Evidence.”Business Strategy and the Environment33 (5): 4086–4107. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.3698.
UusitaloV.HalonenV.KoljonenH.HeikkinenS.ClaudelinA.2024. “In Search for Climate Neutrality in Ice Hockey: A Case of Carbon Footprint Reduction in a Finnish Professional Team.”Journal of Environmental Management355: 120455. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120455.
82.
Valero-GilJ.SurrocaJ. A.TriboJ. A.GutierrezL.MontielI.2023. “Innovation vs. Standardization: The Conjoint Effects of Eco-innovation and Environmental Management Systems on Environmental Performance.”Research Policy52 (4): 104737.
83.
WaheedR.SarwarS.AlsaggafM. I.2023. “Relevance of Energy, Green and Blue Factors to Achieve Sustainable Economic Growth: Empirical Study of Saudi Arabia.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change187: 122184.
84.
WanJ.BaylisK.MulderP.2015. “Trade-Facilitated Technology Spillovers in Energy Productivity Convergence Processes across EU Countries.”Energy Economics48: 253–64.
85.
WangH.PengG.RazzaqA.2023. “Asymmetric Influence of Renewable Energy, Ecological Governance, and Human Development on Green Growth of BRICS Countries.”Renewable Energy206: 1007–1019.
86.
WangK. H.UmarM.AkramR.CaglarE.2021. “Is Technological Innovation Making World ‘Greener’? An Evidence from Changing Growth Story of China.”Technological Forecasting and Social Change165: 120516.
87.
WangX.XuZ.QinY.SkareM.2022. “Innovation, the Knowledge Economy, and Green Growth: Is Knowledge-Intensive Growth Really Environmentally Friendly?” Energy Economics115: 106331.
XuG.DongH.XuZ.BhattaraiN.2022. “China Can Reach Carbon Neutrality Before 2050 by Improving Economic Development Quality.”Energy243: 123087.
90.
YahyaF.LeeC. C.2023. “The Asymmetric Effect of Agriculturalization toward Climate Neutrality Targets.”Journal of Environmental Management328: 116995. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022. 116995.
91.
YanZ.ZouB.DuK.LiK.2020. “Do Renewable Energy Technology Innovations Promote China’s Green Productivity Growth? Fresh Evidence from Partially Linear Functional-Coefficient Models.”Energy Economics90: 104842.
92.
YangH.ShahzadiI.HussainM.2021. “USA Carbon Neutrality Target: Evaluating the Role of Environmentally Adjusted Multifactor Productivity Growth in Limiting Carbon Emissions.”Journal of Environmental Management298: 113385. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113385.
