We measure the effect of incentive payments on residential time-of-day (TOD) electricity demand in summer, using data from a residential TOD electricity pricing experiment in the Kyushu region of southern Japan. During the experiment, participating households could receive incentive payments if they reduce their peak usage share. Results based on an econometric model indicate that households have shifted their electricity usage from peak to off-peak periods in response to the incentive payment, but the effect of the incentive payment on load shifting was modest.
AignerD. ed. (1984). The Welfare Econometrics of Peak-Load Pricing for Electricity, Special issue, Journal of Econometrics 26: 1-252.
2.
AignerD. (1985). “The Residential Electricity Time-of-Use Pricing Experiments: What Have We Learned?” in Hausman, J. and WiseD. eds.. Social Experimentation, 11-53, Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
AignerD.GhaliK. (1989). “Self-Selection in the Residential Electricity Time-of-Use Pricing Experiments,” Journal of Applied Econometrics 4:S131-S144.
4.
AignerD.HausmanJ. (1980). “Correcting for Truncation Bias in the Analysis of Experiments in Tinte-of-Day Pricing of Electricity,” RAND Journal of Economics11: 131-142.
5.
CavesD.ChristensenL. (1980). “Econometric Analysis of Residential Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing Experiments,” Journal of Econometrics14: 287-306.
6.
CavesD.ChristensenL.HerrigesJ. (1987). “The Neoclassical Model of Consumer Demand with Identically Priced Commodities: An Application to Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing,” RAND Journal of Economics18: 564-580.
7.
CavesD.HerrigesJ.KuesterK. (1989). “Load Shifting under Voluntary Residential Time-of-Use Rates,” The Energy Journal10(4): 83-99.
8.
HamJ.MountainD.ChanM. (1997). “Time-of-Use Prices and Electricity Demand: Allowing for Selection Bias in Experimental Data,” RAND Journal of Economics 28: SI 13-S141.
9.
HawdonD. (1992). “Is Electricity Consumption Influenced by Time-of-Use Tariffs?: A Survey of Results and Issues,” in Hawdon, D. ed., Energy Demand: Evidence and Expectations, 97-114, London: Surrey University Press.
10.
IleckmanJ. (1978). “Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System,” Econometrica46: 931-959.
11.
HenleyA.PerisonJ. (1994). “Time-of-Use Electricity Pricing: Evidence from a British Experiment,” Economics Letters45: 421-426.
12.
LawrenceA.AignerD. eds. (1979). Modelling and Forecasting Time-of-Day and Seasonal Electricity Demands, Journal of Econometrics 9:1-237.
13.
MatsukawaI. (1996). “Impacts of Permanent Time-of-Day Rates on Residential Demand for Electricity: Evidence from Japanese Data,” presented at the 17th Annual North American Conference of the USAEE/IAEE, October 27-30, Boston.
14.
MountainD.LawsonE. (1992). “A Disaggregated Nonhomothetic Modeling of Responsiveness to Residential Time-of-Use Electricity Rates,” International Economic Review33: 181-207.
15.
PollakR.WalesT. (1992). Demand System Specification and Estimation, New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
TishlerA.LipovetskyS. (1997). “The Flexible CES-GBC Family of Cost Functions: Derivation and Application,” Review of Economics and Statistics79: 638-646.
17.
TrainK.MehrezG. (1994). “Optional Time-of-Use Prices for Electricity: Econometric Analysis of Surplus and Pareto Impacts,” RAND Journal of Economics25: 263-283.
18.
WhiteH. (1980). “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix and a Direct Tes! for Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica48: 721-746.
