What is the Value of Scientific Knowledge? An Application to Global Warming Using the PRICE Model

Abstract

Governments must cope with the enormous uncertainties about both future climate change as well as the costs and benefits of slowing climate change. This study analyses the value of improved information about a variety of geophysical and economic processes. The value of information is estimated using the "PRICE model" which is a probabilistic extension of earlier models of the economics of global warming. The study uses five different approaches to estimating the value of information about all uncertain parameters and about individual parameters. It is estimated that the value of early information is between $1 and $2 billion for each year that resolution of uncertainty is moved toward the present. We estimate that the most important uncertain variables are the damages of climate change and the costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Resolving the uncertainties about these two parameters would contribute 75 percent of the value of improved knowledge.

Keywords

Climate change energy policy uncertainty PRICE model improved knowledge greenhouse gas emissions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cline

William

(1992). The Economics of Global Warming. Institute of International Economics, Washington, DC.

Edmonds

J.A.

Reily

J.M.

Gardner

R.H.

Brenkert

(1986). Uncertainty in Future Energy Use and Fossil Fuel CO₂ Emissions 1975 to 2075. U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/NBB-0081, December.

Efron

Bradley

Tibshirani

Robert J.

(1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.

Fankhauser

Samuel

(1995). Valuing Climate Change. London: Earthscan.

Hoelleer

Peter

Dean

Andrew

Hayafumi

Masahiro

(1992). “New Issues, New Results: The OECD’s Second Survey of the Macroeconomic Costs of Reducing CO₂, Emissions.” OECD/GD(92)141, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris. Mimeo.

Inman

Ronald L.

Conover

W.J.

(1980). “Small Sample Sensitivity Analysis: Techniques for Computer Models, with an Application to Risk Assessment.” Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods A 9(17): 1749-1842.

Lind

Robert C.

, ed. (1982). Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

McKay

M.D.

Beckman

R.J.

Conover

W.J.

(1979). “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code.” Technometrics 21(2) May: 239-245.

Manne

Alan S.

Richels

Richard G.

(1992). Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO₂ Emission Limits. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.

10.

Morgan

M.G.

Henrion

(1990). Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

11.

National Research Council (1979). Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

12.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1979). The Efficient Use of Energy Resources. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

13.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1991). “To Slow or Not to Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” The Economic Journal 101 (July): 920-937.

14.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1993). “Rolling the DICE” Science, November: 1232-39.

15.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1994). Managing the Global Commons. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.

16.

Nordhaus

William D.

(1994a). “Expert Opinion on Climate Change.” American Scientist 82(1): 45-51.

17.

Nordhaus

William D.

Yohe

Gary

(1983). “Future Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil Fuels.”In Changing Climate, National Research Council, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.