In this paper, consumer energy demand is estimated as part of a complete demand system using a consistent set of international data on prices and expenditures for 53 countries ranging from the poorest to the wealthiest. We compare three models: the Translog, the Deaton-Muellbauer Almost Ideal Demand System (DM), and the Generalized Logit (Logit), and two levels of commodity aggregation (6-good and 9-good). The estimation results indicate that the model specification and level of aggregation are important. The Logit model performs better than the Translog and D-M models which provide illogical elasticity estimates for many countries. The 9-good model shows that the demand for electricity is significantly more price and income elastic than the demand for primary energy.
AngB.W. (1987). “A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Energy-Output Correlation.” Energy Economics9(4): 274-286.
2.
ConsidineT.MountT.D. (1984). “The Use of Linear Logit Models for Dynamic Input Demand Systems.” The Review of Economics and Statistics66(3): 434-444.
3.
DahlC. (1991). “Survey of Energy Demand Elasticities in Developing Countries,” Technical Report for Energy Modeling Forum 11.
4.
DeatonA.MuellbauerJ. (1980a). “An Almost Ideal Demand System.” American Economic Review70(3): 312-326.
5.
DeatonA.MuellbauerJ. (1980b). Economics and Consumer Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
DumaganJ.C.MountT.D. (1993). “Welfare Effects of Improving End-Use Efficiency: Theory and Application to Residential Electricity Demand.” Resource and Energy Economics 15(2): 175201.
7.
ElkhafifM.A.T. (1992). “Estimating Disaggregated Price Elasticities in Industrial Energy Demand.” The Energy Journal13(4): 209-217.
8.
Eurostat (1991). “Comparison of Price Levels and Economic Aggregates 1985: The Results for 22 African Countries”.
9.
FiebigD.G.SealeJ.TheilH. (1987). “The Demand for Energy: Evidence from a crosscountry Demand System.” Energy Economics9(3): 149-153.
10.
GreenR.AlstonJ. (1990). “Elasticities in AIDS Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics72(2): 442-445.
11.
HongJ.H.MountT.D. (1994). “The Performance of Alternative Flexible Functional Forms in Modeling Demand Systems.” Working Paper (forthcoming), Cornell University.
12.
International Monetary Fund (1993). World Economic Outlook.
13.
JorgensonD.WilcoxenP. (1990). “Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth.” The RAND Journal of Economics21: 314-336.
14.
KravisHestonSummers (1978). International Comparisons of Real Product and Purchasing Power. Produced by The Statistical Office of The United Nations and The World Bank, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
KravisHestonSummers (1982). World Product and Income: International Comparisons of Real Gross Product. Produced by The Statistical Office of The United Nations and The World Bank, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
PindyckR.S.RubinfeldD.L. (1991). Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 3rd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
SealeJ.L.Jr.WalkerW.E.KimI. (1991). “The Demand for Energy: Cross-country Evidence Using the Florida Model.” Energy Economics13(1): 33-40.
TheilH.ChungC.SealeJ.L.Jr. (1989). International Evidence on Consumption Patterns. Greenwich, CT and London: JAI Press.
20.
United Nations Commission of the European Communities and Eurostat (1986). World Comparisons of Purchasing Power and Real Product for 1980, Phase IV of the International Comparison Project, Part Two: Detailed Results for 60 Countries. Printed in United Nations, New York.
21.
VarianH.R. (1984. Microeconomic Analysis. New York: W.W. Norton &Company.
22.
The World Bank (1992). World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
The World Bank (1993). World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
World Resources Institute (1994). World Resources 1994-5: People and the Environment.. Oxford University Press.
