In this paper I specify CO2 abatement cost functions for five different world regions. A cost-effective CO2 agreement is defined by the emissions that follow from minimising the total abatement costs, given a specified CO2 emission limit. Under the cost-effective agreement, the industrialised countries bear all reductions, while developing countries are actually allowed to increase emissions compared to the 1990 level. The developing countries will, nevertheless, bear the highest burdens under this treaty. The agreement is also analysed under different tradeable permit regimes and compared to uniform percentage reductions. The transfers from tradeable permit systems are high, and may be difficult for political leaders to justify. An allocation based on historical CO2 emissions is the only simple rule which ensures every region is better off than under uniform percentage reductions.
BoeroG.ClarkeR.WintersL. A. (1991). “The macroeconomic consequences of controlling greenhouse gases - A survey.” Environmental Economic Research Series, UK Department of the Environment. London: HMSO.
2.
BrookeA.KendrickD.MeerausA. (1988). GAMS: A User’s Guide. Redwood City: Scientific Press.
3.
BurniauxJ. M.MartinJ. P.NicolettiG.Oliveira MartinsJ. (1992). “The Costs of Reducing; CO2 Emissions: Evidence from GREEN.” OECD, Department of Economics and Statistics, Working Paper No. 115. Paris: OECD.
4.
FankhauserS.KverndokkS. (1992). “The Global Warming Game - Simulations of a CO2 Reduction Agreement.” Memorandum No 13 from the Department of Economics and GEC Working paper 92-10, CSERGE (Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment). Oslo: University of Oslo. London: CSERGE, University College London.
5.
GrubbM. (1989). “The Greenhouse Effect: Negotiating Targets.” London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
6.
HoelM. (1991). “Efficient international agreements for reducing emissions of CO2.” The Energy Journal12(2): 93-107.
7.
HoellerP.DeanA.NicolaisenJ. (1991). “Macroeconomic implications of reducing; greenhouse gas emissions: A survey of empirical studies.” OECD Economic studies, no. 16. Paris: OECD.
8.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1990): Climate Change. The IPCC Scientific Assessment, (Report from Working Group I). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
KverndokkS. (1992a). “Global CO2 agreements: A cost efficient approach.” Memorandum No 4 from the Department of Economics, University of Oslo and GEC Working Paper 92-01, CSERGE (Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment). Oslo: University of Oslo, London: CSERGE, University College London.
10.
KverndokkS. (1992b). “Tradeable CO2 permits: Initial Distribution as a Justice Problem.” Memorandum No 23 from the Department of Economics, University of Oslo. Oslo: University of Oslo.
11.
LedicM. (1990). “Energy policies and the greenhouse effect: A case study of China.” Chapter for the Chatham House EEP Study, Energy Policies and the Greenhouse Effect.
12.
ManneA. S.RichelsR. G. (1991a). “Global CO2 Emission Reductions - the Impacts of Rising; Energy Costs.” The Energy Journal12(1): 87-107.
13.
ManneA. SRichelsR. G. (1991b). “International Trade in Carbon Emission Rights: A. Decomposition Procedure.” The American Economic Review81(2): 135-139.
14.
ManneA. S.RichelsR. G. (1992). Buying Greenhouse Insurance - the Economic Costs of CO2 Emission Limits. Cambridge, MA:: MIT-Press.
15.
MorgensternR. D. (1991). “Towards a Comprehensive Approach to Global Climate Change Mitigation.” The American Economic Review81(2): 140-145.
16.
NordhausW. D. (1991a). “The Cost of Slowing Climate Change: a Survey.” The Energy Journal12(1): 37-65.
17.
NordhausW. D. (1991b). “A Sketch of the Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” The American Economic Review81(2): 146-150.
18.
NordhausW. D. (1991c). “To Slow or not to Slow: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect.” The Economic Journal101(407): 920-937.
19.
PearceD. W. (1990a). “Economics and the global environmental challenge.” The Henry Sidgwick Memorial Lecture at Newnham College. Cambridge: Newnham College.
20.
PearceD. W. (1990b). “Greenhouse Gas Agreements: Part 1 - Internationally Tradeable Greenhouse Gas Permits.” London: University College London.
21.
WhalleyJ.WigleR. M. (1991a). “Cutting CO2 Emissions: The Effects of Alternative Policy Approaches.” The Energy Journal12(1): 109-124.
22.
WhalleyJ.WigleR. M. (1991b). “The international incidence of carbon taxes.” In DornbuschR.PoterbaJ., eds. Economic Policy Responses to Global Warming. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
23.
World Bank (1985). World Development Report 1985. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
