ArrowKenneth J. (1962). “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing.” Review of Economic Studies29: 155-173.
2.
BerglasEitan (1965). “Investment and Technical Change.” Journal of Political Economy73:2 April, 173-180.
3.
BerndtErnst R. (1991). The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
4.
BerndtErnst R.FussMelvyn A. (1986). “Productivity Measurement with Adjustments for Variations in Capacity Utilization and Other Forms of Temporary Equilibrium.” Journal of Econometrics33:1/2, October/November, 7-29.
5.
BerndtErnst R.GrilichesZvi (1993). “Price Indexes for Microcomputers: An Exploratory Study,” in Murray F. Foss, Marilyn E. Manser and Allan Young, eds., Price Measurements and Their Uses, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, forthcoming.
6.
BerndtErnst R.HesseDieter M. (1986). “Measuring and Assessing Capacity Utilization in the Manufacturing Sectors of Nine OECD Countries.” European Economic Review30:5 October, 961-989.
7.
BerndtErnst R.KolstadCharles D.LeeJong-Kun (1991). Embodied Technical Change and Productivity, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, unpublished manuscript.
8.
BerndtErnst R.WoodDavid O. (1982). “The Specification and Measurement of Technical Change in US Manufacturing,” Chapter 7 in John R. Moroney, ed., Advances in the Economics of Energy and Resources, Vol. 4, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 199-221.
9.
BrownRandall S.ChristensenLaurits R. (1981). “Estimating Elasticities of Substitution in a Model of Partial Static Equilibrium: An Application to U.S. Agriculture, 1947-1974,” in Ernst R. Berndt and Barry C. Field, eds., Modelling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press, pp. 209-229.
10.
HultenCharles R. (1990). “The Measurement of Capital,” in Ernst R. Berndt and Jack E. Triplett, eds., Fifty Years of Economic Measurement, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 54, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 119-152.
11.
HultenCharles R. (1992). “Growth Accounting when Technical Change is Embodied in Capital.” American Economic Review82:4 September, 964-980.
12.
International Energy Agency, Energy Balances of OECD Countries, Paris (various issues).
13.
International Energy Agency, Energy Prices and Taxes, Paris (various issues).
14.
IntriligatorMichael D. (1965). “Embodied Technical Change and Productivity in the United States, 1929-1958.” Review of Economics and Statistics47:1 February, 65-70.
15.
IntriligatorMichael D. (1991). Productivity and the Embodiment of Technical Progress, paper presented at Uppsala University Conference on Welfare, Quality and Productivity in the Service Industries, Uppsala, Sweden, May 21-23, 1991.
16.
JorgensonDale W. (1966). “The Embodiment Hypothesis.” Journal of Political Economy74:1 February, 1-17.
17.
KravisI. B.KenesseyZ.HestonA.SummersR. (1976). A System of International Comparisons of Gross Product and Purchasing Power, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
KravisI. B.KenesseyZ.HestonA.SummersR. (1978). World Product and Income: International Comparisons of Real Gross Product, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
LeeJohn-Kun (1991). Modelling and Measuring Technical Change and Productivity Growth, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana.
20.
McCarthyMichael D. (1965). “Embodied and Disembodied Technical Progress in the Constant Elasticity of Substitution Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics47:1 Februaty, 71-75.
21.
McHughRichardLaneJulia (1987). “The Age of Capital, the Age of Utilized Capital, and Tests of the Embodiment Hypothesis.” Review of Economics and Statistics69:2 May, 362-367.
22.
MorrisonCatherine J. (1990) “Decisions of Firms and Productivity Growth with Fixed Input Constraints: An Empirical Comparison of the U.S. and Japanese Manufacturing Industries,” in HultenCharles R., ed., Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States, Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 53, Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 135-167.
23.
MorrisonCatherine J. (1992). “Unraveling the Productivity Growth Slowdown in the U.S., Canada and Japan: The Effects of Subequilibrium, Scale Economies and Markups.” Review of Economics and Statistics74:3 August, 381-393.
24.
NelsonRandy A. (1984). “Regulation, Capital Vintage, and Technical Change in the Electric Utility Industry.” Review of Economics and Statistics66:1 February, 59-69.
25.
NelsonRandy A. (1986). “Capital Vintage, Time Trends, and Technical Change in the Electric Power Industry.” Southern Economic Journal53:2 June, 315-332.
26.
OhtaMakota (1974). “A Note on the Equality Between Production and Cost Functions: Rate of Returns to Scale and Rate of Technical Progress.” Economic Studies Quarterly25: 63-65.
27.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, National Accounts Detailed Tables, Vol. II, various issues, Paris (various dates, latest 1989).
28.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Flows and Stocks of Fixed Capital, Paris, 1983, 1987, 1989.
29.
SolowRobert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function.” Review of Economics and Statistics39:3 August, 312-320.
30.
SolowRobert M. (1960). “Investment and Technical Progress,” in ArrowKenneth J.KarlinSamuelSuppesPatrick, eds., Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 89-104.
31.
SolowRobert M. (1962). “Technical Progress, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 52:2, May, 76-86.
32.
SolowRobert M. (1988). “Growth Theory and After.” American Economic Review78:3 June, 307-317.
33.
TinbergenJan (1959). “On the Theory of Trend Movements,” in L. H. Klaassen, L. M. Koyck and H. J. Witteveen, eds., Jan Tinbergen: Selected Papers, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 182-221.
34.
Originally published in German as “Zur Theorie der langfristigen Wirtschaftsentwicklung,” Weltwirtschafliches Archiv55 (1942), pp. 511-549.
35.
TriplettJack E. (1989). “Price and Technological Change in a Capital Good: A Survey of Research on Computers,” chapter 4 in Dale W. Jorgenson and Ralph Landau, eds., Technology and Capital Formation Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press, pp. 127-213.
36.
UriNoel D. (1984). “The Impact of Technical Change on the Aggregate Production Function.” Applied Economics16:4 August, 555-567.