This paper analyzs the influence of green innovation and environmental performance on the success of US corporate venture capital (CVC) parent firms. Furthermore, it investigates the intermediary function of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in this relation. Our sample consists of CVC parent firms obtained from multiple databases between 2002 to 2019. Our findings suggest that incorporating sustainability into target company plans has the dual benefit of improving environmental outcomes and boosting long-term financial performance for CVC parent firms. We find that companies that have lower levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions demonstrate better financial success over the long term. Moreover, allocating resources to environmentally-friendly advancements results in positive financial results in both the short and long term. Our findings have important significance for policymakers and practitioners, providing guidance for the creation of sustainable business strategies. By promoting innovation focused on sustainability and decreasing GHG emissions, CVC parent firms may actively contribute to a more sustainable future while also assuring long-term financial success.
AdedoyinF.OzturkI.AbubakarI.KumekaT.FolarinO., and BekunF.V. (2020). “Structural breaks in CO2 emissions: Are they caused by climate change protests or other factors?” Journal of Environmental Management 2020.110628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
2.
AlfalihA.A.and HadjT.B. (2024). “Ecological impact assessment of green technological innovation under different thresholds of human capital in G20 countries.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2024.123276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
3.
AllaireM.and BrownS.P.A. (2015). “The Green Paradox of U.S. Biofuel Subsidies: Impact on Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy4(2)83–102.
4.
AmbecS.CohenM.A.ElgieS., and LanoieP. (2013). “The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation En¬hance Innovation and Competitiveness?” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy7: 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ reep/res016.
5.
Anderson-WeirC. (2010). “How Does the Stock Market React to Corporate Environmental News?” Undergraduate Eco¬nomic Review6.
6.
AsiaeiK.JusohR.BaraniO., and AsiaeiA. (2022). “How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems.” Business Strategy and the Environment31: 1587–1606. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2971.
7.
AtifM.HossainM.AlamM.S., and GoergenM. (2021). “Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consump¬tion?” Journal of Corporate Finance66:101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin. 2020.101665.
8.
BaierlR.AnokhinS., and GrichnikD. (2016). “Coopetition in corporate venture capital: the relationship between network attributes, corporate innovativeness, and financial performance.” International Journal of Technology Management71: 58–80.https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2016.077978.
9.
BansalP.and RothK. (2000). “Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness.” Academy of Manage¬ment Journal43: 717–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363.
10.
Bárcena-RuizJ.C., GarzónM.B., and SagastaA. (2023). “Environmental corporate social responsibility, R&D and disclo¬sure of “green” innovation knowledge.” Energy Economics120:106628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106628.
11.
BarneyJ. (1991). “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage.” Journal of Management17: 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
12.
BattistiE.NirinoN.LeonidouE., and ThrassouA. (2022). “Corporate venture capital and CSR performance: An ex¬tended resource based view's perspective.” Journal of Business Research139: 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbus-res.2021.10.054.
13.
BenkraiemR.DubocageE.belongY., and ShuwaikhF. (2023a). “The effects of environmental performance and green inno¬vation on corporate venture capital.” Ecological Economics210:107860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107860.
14.
BenkraiemR.GonçalvesD., and ShuwaikhF. (2023b). “The role of corporate venture capitalists in supporting the growth of their backed start-ups.” European Business Review ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2022-0183.
15.
BenkraiemR.ShuwaikhFLakhalF., and GuizaniA. (2022). “Carbon performance and firm value of the World's most sustainable companies.” Economic Modelling116: 106002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106002.
16.
BensonD.and ZiedonisR. (2009). “Corporate Venture Capital as a Window on New Technologies : Implications for the Per¬formance of Corporate Investors When Acquiring Startups.” Organization Science20: 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.1080.0386.
17.
BhatiaP.and RanganathanJ. (2004). Development (WBCSD), World Business Council for Sustainable Development 2004. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
18.
BocquetR.BasC. Le, MotheC., and PoussingN. (2017). “CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Business Ethics146: 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-015-2959-8.
19.
BoltonP.and KacperczykM. (2021). “Do investors care about carbon risk?” Journal of Financial Economics142: 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008.
20.
BoseS.MinnickK., and ShamsS. (2021). “Does carbon risk matter for corporate acquisition decisions?” Journal of Corpo¬rate Finance70: 102058. https://doi.org/l0.1016/j. jcorpfin.2021.102058.
21.
BouriE.RognoneL.SokhanvarA., and WangZ. (2023). “From climate risk to the returns and volatility of energy assets and green bonds: A predictability analysis under various conditions.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change194: 122682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122682.
22.
BrammerS.JacksonG., and MattenD. (2012). “Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance.” Socio-Economic Review10: 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr030.
23.
BuchananB., CaoC.X., and ChenC. (2018). “Corporate social responsibility, firm value, and influential institutional owner¬ship.” Journal of Corporate Finance52: 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin. 2018.07.004.
24.
BuschT.and HoffmannV.H. (2011). “How Hot Is Your Bottom Line? Linking Carbon and Financial Performance.” Business & Society50: 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398780.
25.
CailouJ.and DeHaiL. (2022). “Does venture capital stimulate the innovation of China's new energy enterprises?” Energy244: 122704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122704.
26.
Cegarra-NavarroJ.-G.ReverteC., Gómez-MeleroE. and WensleyA.K.P. (2016). “Linking social and economic respon¬sibilities with financial performance: The role of innovation.” European Management Journal34: 530–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.02.006.
27.
CentobelliP.CerchioneR.EspositoE. (2020). “Pursuing supply chain sustainable development goals through the adoption of green practices and enabling technologies: A cross-country analysis of LSPs.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change153: 119920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119920.
28.
ChemmanurT.J.LoutskinaE., and TianX. (2014). “Corporate Venture Capital, Value Creation, and Innovation.” Review of Financial Studies27: 2434–2473. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu033.
29.
ChenJ.LeungW.S.SongW., and GoergenM. (2019). “Why female board representation matters: The role of female directors in reducing male CEO overconfidence.” Journal of Empirical Finance53: 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jem-pfin.2019.06.002.
30.
ChenS.SongY., and GaoP. (2023). “Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and financial outcomes: Analyzing the impact of ESG on financial performance.” Journal of Environmental Management345: 118829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829.
31.
ChenYand MaY (2021). “Does green investment improve energy firm performance?” Energy Policy153: 112252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112252.
32.
ChenY.YaoZ., and ZhongK. (2022). “Do environmental regulations of carbon emissions and air pollution foster green technology innovation: Evidence from China's prefecture-level cities.” Journal of Cleaner Production350:131537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131537.
33.
ChenY.-S. (2008). “The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms.” Journal of Busi¬ness Ethics 11:271–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-006-9349-l.
34.
CooperS.A.RamanK.K., and YinJ. (2018). “Halo effect or fallen angel effect? Firm value consequences of greenhouse gas emissions and reputation for corporate social responsibility.” Public Policy37: 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2018.04.003.
35.
DelmasM.A.and PekovicS. (2018). “Corporate Sustainable Innovation and Employee Behavior.” Journal of Business Eth¬ics150: 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-016-3163-l.
36.
DelGranado P.C., ReschG., HolzF., WelischM., GeipelJ., HartnerM., ForthuberS., SensfussF., OlmosL., BernathC., LumbrerasS., KranzlL., MüllerA., HeitelS., HerbstA., WilsonC., and RamosA. (2020). “Energy Transition Pathways to a Low-carbon Europe in 2050: The Degree of Cooperation and the Level of Decentralization.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 9 (1), 121–136.
37.
DiMaggioP.J.and PowellW.W. (1983). “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review48: 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
38.
DistadioL.F.FergusonA., and LamP. (2023). “Common Stock Returns around Farmout Announcements in the Oil and Gas Industry.” The Energy Journal,44 (4), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.44.4. ldis.
39.
DonaldsonT.and PrestonL.E. (1995). “The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications.” Academy of Management Review20: 65–91. https://doi.org/10.2307/258887.
40.
DowellG.HartS., and YeungB. (2000). “Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?” Management Science46: 1059–1074.
41.
DuQ.LiZ.DuM., and YangT. (2024). “Government venture capital and innovation performance in alternative energy production: The moderating role of environmental regulation and capital market activity.” Energy Economics129: 107196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107196.
42.
DushnitskyG.and ShaverM. (2009). “Limitations to Inter-Organizational Knowledge Acquisition: The Paradox of Corpo¬rate Venture Capital” (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1402951). Social Science Research Network, Rochester NY.
43.
EcclesR.G.and SerafeimG. (2013). “The Performance Frontier: Innovating for a Sustainable Strategy.” Harvard Business Review.
44.
FengM.WangX., and KreuzeJ.G. (2017). “Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: Comparison analyses across industries and CSR categories.” American Journal of Business32: 106–133. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-05-2016-0015.
45.
FlammerC. (2015). “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Lead to Superior Financial Performance? A Regression Discon¬tinuity Approach.” Management Science61: 2549–2568.
46.
FreemanR.E. (1984). “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.” Pitman.
47.
GalbreathJ. (2018). “Is Board Gender Diversity Linked to Financial Performance? The Mediating Mechanism of CSR.” Business & Society57: 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316647967.
48.
GillanS.L.KochA., and StarksL.T. (2021). “Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corpo¬rate finance.” Journal of Corporate Finance66:101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin. 2021.101889.
49.
GompersP.and LernerJ. (2000). “The Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Success: Organizational Structure, Incen¬tives, and Complementarities, in: NBER Chapters.” National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, pp. 17–54.
50.
GonencH.and ScholtensB. (2017). “Environmental and Financial Performance of Fossil Fuel Firms: A Closer Inspection of their Interaction.” Ecological Economics132: 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.004.
51.
GregoryA.WhittakerJ., and YanX. (2016). “Corporate Social Performance, Competitive Advantage, Earnings Persistence and Firm Value.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting43: 3–30. https://doi.org/10.llll/jbfa.12182.
52.
HallB.H.JaffeA., and TrajtenbergM. (2005). “Market Value and Patent Citations.” RAND Journal of Economics36:16–38.
53.
HallB.H.JaffeA.B., and TrajtenbergM. (2001). “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Method¬ological Tools” (Working Paper No. 8498), Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8498.
54.
HallB.H.JaffeA.B., and TrajtenbergM. (2000). “Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look” (Working Paper No. 7741), Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7741.
55.
HausmanJ. A. (1978). “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica46:1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.
56.
HegemanP.D.and SørheimR. (2021). “Why do they do it? Corporate venture capital investments in cleantech startups.” Journal of Cleaner Production294: 126315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126315.
57.
HillS.A.and BirkinshawJ. (2014). “Ambidexterity and Survival in Corporate Venture Units.” Journal of Management40: 1899-1931. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312445925.
58.
HockertsK.and WüstenhagenR. (2010). “Greening Goliaths Versus Emerging Davids—Theorizing about the Role of In¬cumbents and New Entrants in Sustainable Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing25: 481–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005.
59.
HoffmannE. (2007). “Consumer integration in sustainable product development.” Business Strategy and the Environment16: 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.577.
60.
IwataH.and OkadaK. (2011). “How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japa¬nese manufacturing firms.” Ecological Economics70:1691–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.010.
61.
JinC.MonfortA.ChenFXiaN., and WuB. (2024). “Institutional investor ESG activism and corporate green innovation against climate change: Exploring differences between digital and non-digital firms.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change200: 123129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123129.
62.
JinX.LeiX., and WuW (2023). “Can digital investment improve corporate environmental performance? Empirical evi¬dence from China.” Journal of Cleaner Production414: 137669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137669.
63.
KangJ.-K.LiY, and OhS. (2022). “Venture Capital Coordination in Syndicates, Corporate Monitoring, and Firm Perfor¬mance.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 50.
64.
KempaK.and MoslenerU. (2017). “Climate policy with the chequebook—An economic analysis of climate investment support.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy,6 (1), 111–130.
65.
KingA.and LenoxM. (2002). “Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction.” Management Science48: 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.2.289.258.
66.
KolkA.and PinkseJ. (2008). “A perspective on multinational enterprises and climate change: Learning from an inconvenient truth.” Journal of International Business Studies39: 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.61.
67.
KonarS.and CohenM.A. (2001). “Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?” Review of Economics and Statistics83:281–289.
68.
KrausS.RehmanS.U., and GarcíaF.J.S. (2020). “Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: The me¬diating role of environmental strategy and green innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change160: 120262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120262.
69.
LeT.T. (2022). “How do corporate social responsibility and green innovation transform corporate green strategy into sus¬tainable firm performance?” Journal of Cleaner Production362:132228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132228.
70.
Leal-MillánA., Guadix-MartinJ., and García-LegazF. Criado (2023). “From networking orientation to green image: A sequential journey through relationship learning capability and green supply chain management practices. Evidence from the automotive industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change192: 122569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-fore.2023.122569.
71.
LeeK.-H.MinB., and YookK.-H. (2015). “The impacts of carbon (C02) emissions and environmental research and devel¬opment (R&D) investment on firm performance.” International Journal of Production Economics167: 1—11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.018.
72.
LeeS.U.and KangJ. (2015). “Technological Diversification Through Corporate Venture Capital Investments: Creating Var¬ious Options to Strengthen Dynamic Capabilities.” Industry and Innovation22: 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/136627 16.2015.1054128.
73.
LiX.WangR.ShenZ.Y.SongM. (2023). “Green credit and corporate energy efficiency: Enterprise pollution transfer or green transformation.” Energy285: 129345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129345.
74.
LiuW.ZhangJ., and YangT. (2022). “Will China's household coal replacement policies pay off: A cost-benefit analysis from an environmental and health perspective.” Journal of Cleaner Production357: 13 1904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131904.
75.
LorenzoF.D. and van de VrandeV. (2019). “Tapping into the knowledge of incumbents: The role of corporate venture capital investments and inventor mobility.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal13: 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1304.
76.
MaS. (2020). “The Life Cycle of Corporate Venture Capital.” Review of Financial Studies33: 358–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz042.
77.
MaYDingYWangZ., and ZhangW (2023). “Building trust after pollution emergency: A strategic perspective on corpo¬rate social responsibility.” Energy Economics126: 106989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106989.
78.
MargolisJ.D.and WalshJ.P. (2003). “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business.” Administrative Science Quarterly48: 268–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659.
79.
MazzaP., and ShuwaikhF. (2022). “Industry-relatedness, geographic proximity and strategic decisions of corporate and independent venture capital-backed companies.” Journal of Small Business Management60: 1–38. https://doi.org/10.108 0/00472778.2022.2108432.
80.
MisaniN.and PogutzS. (2015). “Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach.” Ecological Economics109: 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.010.
81.
NiemannC.C.DickelP., and EckardtG. (2020). “The interplay of corporate entrepreneurship, environmental orientation, and performance in clean-tech firms—A double-edged sword.” Business Strategy and the Environment29: 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2357.
82.
NishitaniK.and KokubuK. (2012). “Why Does the Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Enhance Firm Value? The Case of Japanese Manufacturing Firms.” Business Strategy and the Environment21: 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.734.
83.
OsmundsenP.LovasK., and EmhjellenM. (2022). “Investment Allocation with Capital Constraints. Comparison of Fiscal Regimes.” The Energy Journal,43(1)263–284. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.l.posm
84.
OrlitzkyM.SchmidtF, and RynesS. (2003). “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Organiza¬tion Studies 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910.
85.
PauerS. (2012). “Development and Application of Greenhouse Gas Performance Benchmarks in the European Union Emis¬sions Trading Scheme.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 1 (3), 105–114.
86.
ParkJ.-H.and BaeZ.-T. (2018). “When are 'sharks' beneficial? Corporate venture capital investment and startup innovation performance.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management30: 324—336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1310 376.
87.
PoppD.NewellR.G., and JaffeA.B. (2010). “Chapter 21—Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change,” in: HallB.H.RosenbergN. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Volume 2. North-Holland, pp. 873–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02005-8.
88.
PorterM.E.and van der LindeC. (1995). “Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate.” Harvard Business Review.
89.
PrzychodzenJ.and PrzychodzenW. (2015). “Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance—evi¬dence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary.” Journal of Cleaner Production90: 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.034.
90.
PurnomoPK., and WidianingsihL. R (2012). “The Influence of Environmental Performance on Financial Performance with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Disclosure as a Moderating Variable: Evidence from Listed Companies in Indone¬sia.” Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research1:13.
91.
QiuL.JieX.WangY., and ZhaoM. (2020). “Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advan¬tage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Manage¬ment27: 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1780.
92.
RassierD.G.and EarnhartD. (2010). “Does the Porter Hypothesis Explain Expected Future Financial Performance? The Ef¬fect of Clean Water Regulation on Chemical Manufacturing Firms.” Environmental and Resource Economics45: 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0640-009-9318-0.
93.
RogersE.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. Simon and Schuster.
94.
RokhmawatiA.GunardiA., and RossiM. (2017). “How Powerful is Your Customers' Reaction to Carbon Performance? Linking Carbon and Firm Financial Performance.” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy7: 85–95.
95.
RokhmawatiA.SathyeM., and SathyeS. (2015). “The Effect of GHG Emission, Environmental Performance, and Social Performance on Financial Performance of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Indonesia.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences211: 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.ll.061.
96.
RussoA.PogutzS., and MisaniN. (2021). “Paving the road toward eco-effectiveness: Exploring the link between green¬house gas emissions and firm performance.” Business Strategy and the Environment https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2789.
97.
Sánchez-InfanteHernández, J.P., Yañez-AraqueB., and Moreno-GarcíaJ. (2020). “Moderating effect of firm size on the influence of corporate social responsibility in the economic performance of micro-, small- and medium-sized enterprises.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change151: 119774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119774.
98.
ScarpelliniS.Portillo-TarragonaP., and Marin-VinuesaL.M. (2019). “Green patents: a way to guide the eco-innovation success process?” Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administración32: 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-07-2017-0233.
99.
SchaltenbrandB., FoerstlK., AzadeganA., and LindemanK. (2018). “See What We Want to See? The Effects of Managerial Experience on Corporate Green Investments.” Journal of Business Ethics150:1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-016-3191-x.
100.
SchulerD.A.and CordingM. (2006). “A Corporate Social Performance-Corporate Financial Performance Behavioral Model for Consumers.” Academy of Management Review31: 540–558.
101.
ScottW. (2001). Institutions and Organizations.
102.
ShuwaikhF.BenkraiemR., and DubocageE. (2022a). “Investment in Green Innovation: How does It Contribute to Environ¬mental and Financial Performance?” Journal of Innovation Economics & Management Prépublication, I137-XLIII. https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.prl.0137.
103.
ShuwaikhF.BrintteS., and KhemiriS. (2022b). “The impact of dynamic ambidexterity on the performance of organiza¬tions : Evidence from corporate venture capital investing in North America.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization200: 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.07.012.
104.
ShuwaikhF.BrintteS.KhemiriS., and CastroR.G.D. (2022c). “Venture capital activities under uncertainty: US and UK investors behavior.” Annals of Operations Research (2022c) https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0479-022-04962-3.
105.
ShuwaikhF.HughesM.BrinetteS., and KhemiriS. (2023). “Investment decisions under uncertainty: Corporate venture capital as a real option.” International Journal of Finance & Economics, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2794.
106.
ShuwaikhF.and DiasJ. (2023). “The power of syndication: The innovation output of venture capital investments in the United States.” Management International /International Management / Gestiòn Internacional,27 (4), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.59876/a-6r7m-ahrf.
107.
ShuwaikhF.and DubocageE. (2022). “Access to the Corporate Investors' Complementary Resources: A Leverage for Inno¬vation in Biotech Venture Capital-Backed Companies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change175:121374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121374.
108.
TaoYWangD.YeYWuH.ZhangY (2023). “The role of public environmental concern on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from search index of web users.” Energy Economics126: 107041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107041.
TiddJ.BessantJ., and PavittK. (2005). Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. 3rd Edition. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.
111.
TitusV.K.and AndersonB.S. (2018). “Firm Structure and Environment as Contingencies to the Corporate Venture Cap¬ital-Parent Firm Value Relationship.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice42: 498–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/ etap.12264.
112.
TorugsaN.A.O'DonohueW., and HeckerR. (2013). “Proactive CSR: An Empirical Analysis of the Role of its Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions on the Association between Capabilities and Performance.” Journal of Business Ethics115: 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0551-012-1405-4.
113.
TrinksA.IbikunleG.MulderM., and ScholtensB. (2022). “Carbon Intensity and the Cost of Equity Capital.” The Energy Journal,43 (2), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.2.atri
114.
WadhwaA.PhelpsC., and KothaS. (2016). “Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation.” J. Bus. Ventur.31: 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
115.
WagnerM. (2005). “How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corpo¬rate environmental strategies in the European paper industry.” 76: 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Journal of Environ¬mental Management 2004.11.021.
116.
WagnerM.Van PhuN., AzomahouT., and WehrmeyerW (2002). “The relationship between the environmental and eco¬nomic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the European paper industry.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management9: 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.22.
117.
WangK.AkarG., and ChenY.-J. (2018). “Bike sharing differences among Millennials, Gen Xers, and Baby Boomers: Lessons learnt from New York City's bike share.” Transportation Research Part Policy and Practice116:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.001.
118.
WangL.YangY, and AnY (2021). “Corporate Venture Capital Diversification, Parent Company Value Spillovers, and Value Creation of Start-ups.” Singapore Economic Review https://doi.org/10.1142/S021759082150020X
119.
WangQ.-J.WangH.-J., and ChangC.-P (2022). “Environmental performance, green finance and greeninnovation: What's the long-run relationships among variables?” Energy Economics110:106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106004.
120.
WangX.SunX.AhmadM., and ChenJ. (2024). “Energy transition, ecological governance, globalization, and environ¬mental sustainability: Insights from the top ten emitting countries.” Energy292: 130551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-ergy.2024.130551.
121.
WangZ.and SarkisJ. (2017). “Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance.” Journal of Cleaner Production162: 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142.
122.
WernerfeitB. (1984). “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal5: 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207.
123.
WolcottR.and LippitzM. (2007). “The Four Models of Corporate Entrepreneurship.” MIT Sloan Management Review49.
124.
XuL.FanM.YangL., and ShaoS. (2021). “Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level.” Energy Econ.99:105269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
125.
YadavP.L.HanS.H., and RhoJ.J. (2016). “Impact of Environmental Performance on Firm Value for Sustainable Investment: Evidence from Large US Firms.” Business Strategy and the Environment25: 402–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1883.
126.
YangF.-J.LinC.-W, and ChangY.-N. (2010). “The linkage between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance.” African Journal of Business Management A: 406-413. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM.9000611.
127.
YangS.FengD.LuJ., and WangC. (2022). “The effect of venture capital on green innovation: Is environmental reg¬ulation an institutional guarantee?” Journal of Environmental Management318: 115641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenv-man.2022.115641.
128.
YangT.SunZ.DuM.DuQ.LiL., and ShuwaikhF. (2023). “The impact of the degree of coupling coordination between green finance and environmental regulations on firms' innovation performance: Evidence from China.” Annals of Opera¬tions Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl0479-023-05704-9.
129.
ZahidM.NaeemH.AftabI., and MughalS.A. (2021). “From corporate social responsibility activities to financial perfor¬mance: role of innovation and competitive advantage.” Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship15: 2–13. https://doi.org/l0.1108/APJIE-04-2020-0046.
130.
ZribiW.BoufatehT.LahouelB.B., and UromC. (2024). “Uncertainty shocks, investor sentiment and environmental performance: Novel evidence from a PVAR approach.” International Review of Financial Analysis 103196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103196.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
