Hydrogen is set to become a cornerstone of global low-carbon energy systems globally. This study uses Germany as a case study to examine various hydrogen production and import pathways, with a focus on their Global Warming Potential (GWP). Employing a modular life cycle assessment, we identify and evaluate the primary environmental drivers across these pathways, which include production, conversion, transportation, and reconversion stages. Our findings highlight the significance of the electricity source for hydrogen production and conversion, as well as the efficiency of subsequent processes, including carbon capture rates for blue hydrogen, as critical factors influencing GWP. The necessity for hydrogen imports in countries with high demand and limited domestic production underscores the importance of optimizing hydrogen supply chains for reduced CO2 emissions. This analysis offers valuable insights for advancing sustainable energy transitions in other high-demand regions as well.
Aakko-SaksaPäivi T., CookChris, KiviahoJari, and RepoTimo (2018). “Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers for Transpor¬tation and Storing of Renewable Energy—Review and Discussion.” Journal of Power Sources396:803–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.011.
2.
DawudAnsari, (2022). “The Hydrogen Ambitions of the Gulf States : Achieving Economic Diversification While Maintaining Power.” SWP Comment. https://doi.org/10.18449/2022C44.
3.
JulienArmijo, and PhilibertCédric (2020). “Flexible Production of Green Hydrogen and Ammonia from Variable Solar and Wind Energy: Case Study of Chile and Argentina.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy45 (3): 1541–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.028.
4.
KayBareiß, RuaCristina La, MöcklMaximilian, and HamacherThomas (2019). “Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen from Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis in Future Energy Systems.” Applied Energy237:862–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.001.
5.
BDEW (2022). Bruttostromverbrauch in Deutschland in den Jahren 1990 bis 2022 (engl: Gross electricity consumption in Germany in the years 1990 to 2022). Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft (German Association of Energy and Water Industries).
BMWK (2023). Fortschreibung der Nationalen Wasserstoffstrategie (engl: Update of the National Hydrogen Strategy). Bun-desministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (BMWK) (Federal Mnistry of Economics and Climate Protection).
8.
BorettiA. S.Al-KouzCastelletto W., and NayfehJ. (2021). “The Energy Future of Saudi Arabia Is Not Batteries and Photovoltaic Solar Panels.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science633 (1): 01 2005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/633/1/012005.
9.
BoyanoA.Blanco-MarigortaA. M.MorosukT., and TsatsaronisG. (2011). “Exergoenvironmental Analysis of a Steam Methane Reforming Process for Hydrogen Production.” Energy36 (4): 2202–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-ergy.2010.05.020.
10.
GregorBrändie, SchönfischMax, and SchulteSimon (2020). “Estimating Long-Term Global Supply Costs for Low-Carbon Hydrogen.” EconPaper, 2020.
SteffenBukold, (2020). Blauer Wasserstoff (engl.: blue hydrogen). Edited by Greenpeace.
13.
StokkeBurheim Odne (2017). “Hydrogen for Energy Storage.” In Engineering Energy Storage,147–92. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814100-7.00008-0.
SimonasCerniauskas, GrubeThomas, PraktiknjoAaron, StoltenDetlef, and RobiniusMartin (2019). “Future Hydrogen Markets for Transportation and Industry: The Impact of CO2 Taxes.” Energies12 (24): 4707. https://doi.org/10.3390/ enl2244707.
16.
Dora-AndreeaChisalita, PetrescuLetitia, and CormosCalin-Cristian (2020). “Environmental Evaluation of European Ammonia Production Considering Various Hydrogen Supply Chains.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews130:109964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109964.
17.
DaiyanR.HermawanM., and AmalR. (2021). “The Case for an Australian Hydrogen Export Market to Germany: State of Play. https://doi.org/10.26190/35zd-8p21.
18.
LutzDecker,. 2019. Latest Global Trend in Liquid Hydrogen Production.
19.
dena (2021). dena-Leitstudie Aufbruch Klimaneutralität, Gutachterberichte (dena Lead Study on the Dawn of Climate Neu¬trality, Expert Reports). Deutsche Energie-Agentur GmbH (dena) (German Energy Agency).
20.
MatthiasDeutsch, BadgerJake, and KleidonAxel (2019). Making the most of offshore wind. Edited by Max Planck Institute for Biogeogemistry Agora Energiewende.
Amore-DomenechRafaeld, MecaVladimir L., PolletBruno G., and LeoTeresa J. (2023). “On the Bulk Transport of Green Hydrogen at Sea: Comparison between Submarine Pipeline and Compressed and Liquefied Transport by Ship.” Energy267:126621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126621.
24.
European Central Bank (2022). Euro Foreign Exchange Reference Rates.
25.
ThomasFeck, (2009). Wasserstoff-Emissionen Und Ihre Auswirkungen Auf Den Arkitschen Ozenverlust (engl.: Hydrogen Emissions And Their Impact On The Loss Of Arcite Ozone).Vol. 51.
FrankEdward D., ElgowainyAmgad, ReddiKrishna, and BafanaAdarsh (2021). “Life-Cycle Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydrogen Delivery: A Cost-Guided Analysis.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy46 (43): 22670–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.04.078.
28.
ReinoutHeijungs, (2020). “Is Mainstream LCA Linear?” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment25 (10): 1872–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll367-020-01810-z.
29.
UlrikeHerrmann, PietonNatalia, PflugerBenjamin, AlmsKatharina, KneiskeTanja Manuela, VoglstätterChristopher, KlaaßenBer¬nhard, BurlacuRobert, MartinAlexander, and GerloffBjörn Ole (2022). “Wasserstoffinfrastrukturen—Netze und Speicher.” In Wasserstofftechnologien, edited by Reimund Neugebauer, 175–206. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Hei¬delberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64939-8_8.
30.
Philipp-MchaelHeuser, (2021). Weltweite Infrastruktur zur Wasserstoffbereitstellung Auf Basis Erneuerbarer Energien (engl.: Worldwide infrastructure for hydrogen supply based on renewable energies). 532nd ed. Verlag des Forschungszent¬rums Jülich. https://doi.org/10.18154/RWTH-2021-05487
31.
HuijbregtsMark A. J., SteinmannZoran J. N., ElshoutPieter M. F., StamGea, VeronesFrancesca, VieiraMarisa, ZijpMi-chiel, HollanderAnne, and van ZelmRosalie (2017). “ReCiPe2016: A Harmonised Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method at Mdpoint and Endpoint Level.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment22 (2): 138–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll367-016-1246-y.
IEA (2019). The Future of Hydrogen—Seizing Today's Opportunities. Report prepared for G20, Japan.
34.
IEA (2022). Global Hydrogen Review 2022. International Energy Agency.
35.
ClareJackson, FothergillKevin, GrayPeter, HaroonFaisal, MakhloufiCamel, KezibriNouaamane, DaveyAndy, . (2020). “Ammonia to Green Hydrogen Project.” Edited by Engie Ecuity STFC, Siemens.
36.
MihaJensterle, NaritaJana, PiriaRaffaele, SchröderJonas, SteinbacherKaroline, WahabzadaFarhanja, and ZellerTobias (2020). “ Grüner Wasserstoff: Internationale Kooperations-potenziale für Deutschland (engl. Green hydrogen: Interna¬tional co-operation potential for Germany). Edited by Deutsche Energie Agentur (dena) adelphi consult GmbH Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, Navigant Guidehouse Company.
37.
EdwardJones, QadirManzoor, van VlietMichelle T.H., SmakhtinVladimir, and KangSeong-mu (2019). “The State of De¬salination and Brine Production: A Global Outlook.” Science of The Total Environment 657 (March):1343–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076.
38.
OlgaKanz, BittkauKarsten, DingKaining, RauUwe, and ReindersAngèle. 2021. “Review and Harmonization of the Life-Cycle Global Warming Impact of PV-Powered Hydrogen Production by Electrolysis.” Frontiers in Electronics 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/felec.2021.711103.
ChristinaKockel, NoltingLars, GoldbeckRafael, WulfChristina, DonckerRik W. De, and PraktiknjoAaron. 2022. “A Scalable Life Cycle Assessment of Alternating and Direct Current Microgrids in Office Buildings.” Applied Energy305 (January):l17878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117878.
41.
IoannaKoytsoumpa Efthymia, BerginsChristian, and KakarasEmmanouil. 2018. “The CO2 Economy: Review of CO2 Cap¬ture and Reuse Technologies.” The Journal of Supercritical Fluids132:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029.
XinyuLiu, ElgowainyAmgad, and WangMchael. 2020. “Life Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ammo¬nia Production from Renewable Resources and Industrial By-Products.” Green Chemistry22 (17): 5751–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02301A.
44.
MichaelMoritz, SchönfischMax, and SchulteSimon. 2023. “Estimating Global Production and Supply Costs for Green Hy¬drogen and Hydrogen-Based Green Energy Commodities.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy48 (25): 9139–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.046.
CebollaOrtiz, DolciRafael Francesco, and WeidnerEvelyn. 2022. “Assessment of Hydrogen Delivery Options: Feasibility of Transport of Green Hydrogen within Europe.” Joint Research Centre, European Commission, 2022.
47.
AlexanderOtto, RobiniusMartin, GrubeThomas, SchiebahnSebastian, PraktiknjoAaron, and StoltenDetlef (2017). “Pow-er-to-Steel: Reducing CO2 through the Integration of Renewable Energy and Hydrogen into the German Steel Industry.” Energies10 (4): 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/enl0040451.
RiemerMZhengLPietonNEcksteinJKunzeR, and WietschelM. (2022). “Future Hydrogen Demand: A Cross-Sectoral, Multiregional Meta-Analysis.” Fraunhofer ISI HYPAT Working Paper.
50.
MartinRobinius, CerniauskasSimonas, MadienerReinhard, KockelChristina, PraktiknjoAaron, and StoltenDetlef (2022). “Economics of Hydrogen.” In The Palgrave Handbook of International Energy Economics, edited by HafnerManfred and LucianiGiacomo, 75–102. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86884-0_4.
51.
vanRossum Rik, JensJaro, GuardiaGemma La, WangAnthony, KühnenLuis, and OvergaagMartijn (2022). European Hydrogen Backbone.
52.
OliverRuhnau, BannikSergej, OftenSydney, and PraktiknjoAaron (2019). “Direct or Indirect Electrification? A Review of Heat Generation and Road Transport Decarbonisation Scenarios for Germany 2050.” Energy166:989–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.114.
Scientific services of German Bundestag (2008). Wasserentsalzung (engl.: water desalination).
55.
AndrewSimons, and BauerChristian (2011). “Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production.” In Transition to Hydro¬gen, edited by WokaunAlexander and WilhelmErik, 13–57. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139018036.006.
56.
QianqianSong, TinocoRodrigo Rivera, YangHaiping, YangQing, JiangHao, ChenYingquan, and ChenHanping (2022). “A Comparative Study on Energy Efficiency of the Maritime Supply Chains for Liquefied Hydrogen, Ammonia, Methanol and Natural Gas.” Carbon Capture Science & Technology4:100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100056.
57.
SovacoolBenjamin K. (2017). “Contestation, Contingency, and Justice in the Nordic Low-Carbon Energy Transition.” En¬ergy Policy102:569–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.045.
58.
StolzenburgK.and MubbalaR. (2013). Integrated Design for Demonstration of Efficient Liquefaction of Hydrogen (IDE-ALHY).
59.
DanielTeichmann, ArltWolfgang, and WasserscheidPeter (2012). “Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers as an Efficient Vector for the Transport and Storage of Renewable Energy.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy37 (23): 18118–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.066.
60.
Terrapon-PfaffJPrantnerM, and ErsoyS (2022). “Risikobewertung und Risikokostenanalyse der MENA-Region (engl. : Risk Assessment and Risk Cost Analysis of the MENA Region”. MENA-Fuels: Teilbericht 8 des Wuppertal Instituts an das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz (BMWK) (engl.: MENA-Fuels: Partial Report 8 of the Wuppertal Insti¬tute to the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Protection (BMWK)). Wuppertal Institut.
61.
The Energy Institute (2023). Statistical Review of World Energy - 72nd edition.
AnthonyWang, JensJaro, MavinsDavid, MoultakMarissa, SchimmelMatthias, van der LeunKees, PetresDaan, and BusemanMaud (2021). Analysing Future Demand, Supply, and Transport of Hydrogen. Edited by Guidehouse.
64.
DavidWatts, OsesNicolás, and PérezRodrigo (2016). “Assessment of Wind Energy Potential in Chile: A Project-Based Regional Wind Supply Function Approach.” Renewable Energy96:738–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.038.
GregorWernet, BauerChristian, SteubingBernhard, ReinhardJürgen, Moreno-RuizEmilia, and WeidemaBo (2016). “The Ecoinvent Database Version 3 (Part I): Overview and Methodology.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment21 (9): 1218–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/sll367-016-1087-8.
67.
WietschelM.ZhengL.ArensM.HeblingC.RanzmeyerO.SchaadtA.HankC.. (2021). Metastudie Wasserstoff-Auswertung von Energiesystemstudien. Studie im Auftrag des Nationalen Wasserstoffrats (engl. : Metastudy Hydrogen -Evaluation of energy system studies. Study commissioned by the National Hydrogen Council). Edited by Fraunhofer ISI, 87.
68.
ChristinaWulf, and ZappPetra (2018). “Assessment of System Variations for Hydrogen Transport by Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy43 (26): 11884–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.198.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
