Offshore grids, with multiple interacting transmission and generation units connecting to the shores of several countries, are expected to have an important role in the cost-effective energy transition. Such massive new infrastructure expanding into a new physical space will require new offshore energy market designs. Decisions on these designs today will influence the overall value potential of offshore grids in the future. This paper investigates different possible market configurations and their impacts on operational costs and required congestion management, as well as prices and emissions. We use advanced integrated energy system optimisation, applied to a study case on the North Sea region towards 2050. Our analysis confirms the well-known concept of nodal pricing as the most preferable market configuration. Nodal pricing minimises costs (0.2–1.6 b€/year lower) and CO2 emissions (0.6–5.6 Mton/year lower) with respect to alternative market designs investigated. The performance of the different market designs is highly influenced by the overall architecture of the offshore grid, and the rest of the energy system. E.g., flexibility options help reducing the spread between the designs. But the results are robust: nodal pricing in offshore grids emerges as the preferable market configuration for a cost-effective energy transition to carbon neutrality.
BramstoftR.AlonsoA.JensenI.RavnH.MunsterM. (2020). “Modelling of Renewable Gas And Fuels In Future Integrated Energy Systems.”Applied Energy268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114869.
CommissionE.CentreJ.R.AntonopoulosG.VitielloS.FulliG.MaseraM. (2020). Nodal pricing in the European internal electricity market. Publications Office.
7.
Danish Energy Agency (2021). Technology Catalogues.
8.
DW (2021). Denmark to construct artificial island as a wind energy hub.
9.
EA Energy Analysis (2020). Offshore wind and infrastructure.
10.
EDMOnet-Bathymetry (2021). EMODnet DTM.
11.
European Commission (2018). A Clean Planet for all A European long-term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy.
12.
European Environmental Agency (2020). EEA greenhouse gas-data viewer.
13.
Flex4RES project (2019). Flexible Nordic Energy Systems summary report.
14.
FrankA. Wolak (1999). Report of Redesign of California Real-Time Energy and Ancillary Services Markets.
15.
Gea-BermúdezJ. (2021). “Optimizing the future North Sea integrated energy system.” PhD thesis.
16.
Gea-BermúdezJ.BramstoftR.KoivistoM.KitzingL.RamosA. (2023). “Going offshore or not: Where to generate hydrogen in future integrated energy systems?”Energy Policy174: 113382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113382.
17.
Gea-BermúdezJ.DasK.KoivistoM.J.koduvereH. (2021). “Day-ahead Market Modelling of Large- scale Highly-renewable Multi-energy Systems: Analysis of the North Sea Region Towards 2050.”Energies14. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14010088.
18.
Gea-BermúdezJ.JensenI.G.MünsterM.KoivistoM.KirkerudJ. G.kuang ChenY.RavnH. (2021). “The role of sector coupling in the green transition: A least-cost energy system development in northern-central Europe towards 2050.”Applied Energy289, 116685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116685.
19.
Gea-BermúdezJ.KitzingL.KoivistoM.DasK.MurciaJ.P.León SørensenP. (2022). “The value of sector coupling for the development of offshore power grids.”Energies15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030747.
20.
Gea-BermúdezJ.PadeL.L.KoivistoM.J.RavnH. (2020). “Optimal generation and transmission de- velopment of the north sea region: Impact of grid architecture and planning horizon.”Energy191: 116512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116512.
21.
GunkelP.A.BergaentzléC.Græsted JensenI.SchellerF. (2020). “From passive to active: Flexibility from electric vehicles in the context of transmission system development.”Applied Energy277: 115526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115526.
22.
GunkelP.A.KoduvereH.KirkerudJ.G.FaustoF.J.RavnH. (2020). “Modelling transmission systems in energy system analysis: A comparative study.”Journal of Environmental Management262: 110289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110289.
23.
HarveyS.M.HoganW.W. (2000). “Nodal and zonal congestion management and the exercise of market power. Henney, A. (1998). Contrasts in restructuring wholesale electric markets: England/Wales, California, and the pjm. The Electricity Journal11(7): 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(98)00074-8.
24.
HenningH.-M.PalzerA. (2014). “A comprehensive model for the german electricity and heat sector in a future energy system with a dominant contribution from renewable energy technologies—part i: Methodology.”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews30: 1003–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.012.
25.
HolmbergP.LazarczykE. (2015). “Comparison of congestion management techniques: Nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing.”The Energy Journal36(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.2.7.
26.
IPCC (2022). Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [PörtnerH.-O.RobertsD.C.TignorM.PoloczanskaE.S.MintenbeckK.AlegríaA.CraigM.LangsdorfS.LöschkeS.MöllerV.OkemA.RamaB. (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/downloads/report.
27.
IRENA (2019). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018.
28.
JansenM.DuffyC.GreenT.C.StaffellI. (2022). “Island in the sea: The prospects and impacts of an offshore wind power hub in the north sea.”Advances in Applied Energy6: 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2022.100090.
29.
JensenI.G.WieseF.BramstoftR.MünsterM. (2020). “Potential role of renewable gas in the transition of electricity and district heating systems.”Energy Strategy Reviews 27(November 2019): 100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100446.
30.
KoivistoM.DasK.GuoF.SørensenP.NuñoE.CutululisN.MauleP. (2019). “Using time series simulation tools for assessing the effects of variable renewable energy generation on power and energy systems.”Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment8(3): e329. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.329.
31.
KoivistoM.Gea-BermúdezJ.SørensenP. (2019, November). “North sea offshore grid development: Combined optimization of grid and generation investments towards2050.” IET Renewable Power Generation. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0693.
32.
KonstantelosI.PudjiantoD.StrbacG.De DeckerJ.JosephP.FlamentA.KreutzkampP.GenoeseF.RehfeldtL.WallaschA.-K.GerdesG.JafarM.YangY.TidemandN.JansenJ.NieuwenhoutF.van der WelleA.VeumK. (2017). “Integrated north sea grids: The costs, the benefits and their distribution between countries.”Energy Policy101: 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.024.
33.
KunzF. (2013, October). “Improving congestion management: How to facilitate the integration of renewable generation in Germany.”The Energy Journal34(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.4.4.
MünsterM.MorthorstP.E.LarsenH.V.BregnbækL.WerlingJ.LindboeH.H.RavnH. (2012). “The role of district heating in the future Danish energy system.”Energy48(1): 47–55. 6th Dubrovnik Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy Water and Environmental Systems, SDEWES 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.011.
36.
NewberyD.M. (2018). “What future(s) for liberalized electricity markets: efficient, equitable or innovative?”The Energy Journal39(1). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.1.dnew.
37.
Nordic Energy Research and International Energy Agency (2016). Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 report.
38.
North Sea Power Hub (2020). North Sea wind power hub programme.
39.
NuñoE.MauleP.HahmannA.CutululisN.SørensenP.KaragaliI. (2018). “Simulation of transcontinental wind and solar PV generation time series.”Renewable Energy118: 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.039.
40.
Philip Swisher (2020). “Modelling of Political and Technological Innovation on Northern Europe’s Energy System Towards2050.”
41.
PonceletK.DelarueE.D’haeseleerW. (2020). “Unit commitment constraints in long-term planning models: Relevance, pitfalls and the role of assumptions on flexibility.”Applied Energy258: 113843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113843.
42.
RehfeldtM.FleiterT.ToroF. (2018). “A bottom-up estimation of the heating and cooling demand in European industry.”Energy Efficiency11: 1057–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-017-9571-y.
43.
RuizP.NijsW.TarvydasD.SgobbiA.ZuckerA.PilliR.JonssonR.CamiaA.ThielC.Hoyer-KlickC.LongaF. D.KoberT.BadgerJ.VolkerP.ElbersenB.BrosowskiA.ThränD. (2019). “Enspreso - an open, EU-28 wide, transparent and coherent database of wind, solar and biomass energy potentials.”Energy Strategy Reviews26: 100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100379.
44.
SimsR.E.MabeeW.SaddlerJ.N.TaylorM. (2010). “An overview of second generation biofuel technologies.”Bioresource Technology101(6): 1570–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046.
45.
The European Commission (2020a). Climate strategies and targets.
46.
The European Commission (2020b). EU strategy on offshore renewable energy.
47.
TosattoA.BeselerX.ØstergaardJ.PinsonP.ChatzivasileiadisS. (2021). “North Sea energy islands: Impact on national markets and grids.”Energy Policy167: 112907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112907.
48.
Transport and Environment (2018). How to decarbonize the transport sector by 2050.
49.
WieseF.BaldiniM. (2018). “Conceptual model of the industry sector in an energy system model: A case study for Denmark.”Journal of Cleaner Production203: 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.229.
50.
WieseF.BramstoftR.KoduvereH.AlonsoA.P.BalykO.KirkerudJ.G.Åsa Grytli TvetenBolkesjøT.F.MünsterM.RavnH. (2018). “Balmorel open source energy system model.”Energy Strategy Reviews20: 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2018.01.003.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
