On February 24, 2022, Russian Federation troops invaded Ukraine. Ukraine was previously at war with Russia in 2014, and in April 2015, the government abruptly raised the natural gas tariffs to residential customers. It also scaled up its energy assistance program, the HUS. We examine the welfare effects of the HUS. Using Ukraine’s Household Budget Survey, we find that after the tariff hike, the average household that did not receive the HUS spends 11% of its income on electricity, gas, and fuels, meeting the definition of "fuel poor." The average share among households that do receive the subsidy is . The HUS cuts the rate of fuel poverty in half and brings considerable consumer surplus gains (6% of income), at a price tag of 1-2.5% of GDP. Meaningful savings would be achieved with only a moderate loss of consumer surplus if the HUS was cut in half. Social tariffs or replacing the HUS with a one-time energy efficiency subsidy would be sustainable and entail modest or no welfare losses.
AlberiniAnnaKhymychOlhaŠčasnýMilan (2020). “Responsiveness to Energy Price Changes when Salience is High: Residential Natural Gas Demand in Ukraine.”Energy Policy144(September): 111534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111534.
AnexRobert P. (2002). “Restructuring and privatizing electricity industries in the commonwealth of independent states.”Energy Policy30: 397-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00106-9.
5.
AtansahPriscillaKhandanMasoomehMossToddMukherjeeAnitRichmondJennifer (2017). "When Do Subsidy Reforms Stick? Lessons from Iran, Nigeria, and India." CGD Policy paper 117, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC.
6.
AylinPaulMorrisSaraWakefieldJonGrossinhoAnaJarupLarsElliottPaul (2001). “Temperature, Housing, Deprivation and their Relationship to Excess Winter Mortality in Great Britain, 1986-1996.”International Journal of Epidemiology30(5): 1100-1108. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.5.1100.
7.
BastosPauloCastroLucioCristiaJulianScartasciniCarlos (2015). “Does Energy Consumption Respond to Price Shocks? Evidence from a Regression-Discontinuity Design.”Journal of Industrial Economics63(2): 249-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12074.
8.
BornukovaKaterynaLeshchenkoNataliiaMatysinMikhail (2019). “Fiscal Incidence in Ukraine. A Commitment to Equity Analysis.”World Bank Policy Research Working paper 8765, Washington, DC, March. https://doi.org/10.1596/18139450-8765.
9.
CoadyDavidFlaminiValentinaSearsLouis (2015). “The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies Revisited; Evidence for Developing Countries.” IMF Working Paper No 2015/250, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
10.
CoadyDavidParryIanShangBaoping (2018). “Energy Price Reform: Lessons for Policymakers.”Review of Environmental Economics and Policy12: 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey004.
11.
CoadyDavidParryIanLeNghia-PiotrShangBaoping (2019). “Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An Update Based on Country-Level Estimates.” IMF Working Paper, Fiscal Affairs Department, Washington, DC, May. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484393178.001.
12.
DodonovBorisOpitzPetraPfaffenbergerWolfgang (2004). “How much do electricity tariff increases in Ukraine hurt the poor?" Energy Policy32: 855-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00012-0.
ErsadoLire (2012). “Poverty and Distributional Impact of Gas Price Hike in Armenia.”World Bank Policy Research Working paper 6150, The World Bank, Washington, DC, July. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-6150.
15.
FankhauserSamuelTepicSladjana (2007). “Can poor consumers pay for energy and water? An affordability analysis for transition countries.”Energy Policy35(2): 1038-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Enpol.2006.02.003.
16.
GoncharukAnatoliy G.CirellaGiuseppe T. (2020). “A Perspective on Household Natural Gas Consumption in Ukraine.”The Extractive Industries and Society7: 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.03.016.
17.
GriffinPeterLaursenThomasRobertsonJames (2016). “Egypt. Guiding Reform of Energy Subsidies LongTerm.”World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 7571, The World Bank, Washington, DC, February. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7571.
18.
HahnRobert W.MetcalfeRobert D. (2021). “Efficiency and Equity Impacts of Energy Subsidies.”American Economic Review111(5): 1658-1688. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180441.
19.
HuebnerGesche M.ChalabiZaidHamiltonIanOreszczynTadj (2019). “Determinants of Winter Indoor Temperature below the Threshold for Healthy Living in England.”Energy and Buildings 202: 108399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109399.
KotchenMatthew J. (2021). “The Producer Benefits of Implicit Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the United States.”Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences118(14): e3011969118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2011969118.
22.
KraussAlexander (2016). “How natural gas tariff increases can influence poverty: Results, measurement constraints and bias.”Energy Economics60: 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Eneco.2016.09.010.
RozwalkaPiotrTordengrenHannes (2016). “The Ukrainian residential gas sector: A market untapped.” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies paper NG 109, Oxford, UK, July. https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784670603.
28.
Salehi-IsfahaniDjavad (2014). “Iran’s Subsidy Reform From Promise to Disappointment.” Policy Perspective no. 13, Economic Research Forum, June.
29.
SummerfieldA.J.PreszczynT.HamilinI.G.ShipworthD.HuebnerG.M.LoweR.J.RuysseveltP. (2015). “Empirical Variation in 24-h Profiles of Delivered Power for a Sample of UK Dwellings: Implications for Evaluating Energy Savings.”Energy and Buildings88: 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.11.075.
30.
SorrellSteveDimitropoulosJohnSommervilleMatt (2009). “Empirical Estimates of the Direct Rebound Effect: A Review.”Energy Policy37(4): 1356-1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Enpol.2008.11.026.
31.
TimilsinaGovinda R.SapkotaPrakashSteinbuksJevgenijs (2018). “How Much Has Nepal Lost in the Last Decade Due to Load Shedding? An Economic Assessment Using a CGE Model.”World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 8468, The World Bank, Washington, DC, June. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8468.
World Health Organization (2018). WHO Housing and Health Guidelines. Geneva, ISBN-13: 978-92-4-155037-6.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
