Climate and energy policies use to be embedded in joint packages with seeming coherent goals on which the electricity sector is targeted. However, the complexity of power systems is rarely fully apprehended while setting up such packages, particularly when technical externalities from variable renewable energies (VRE) become widespread and different sources of flexibility need to be considered. We use a detailed power system model subject to a combination of RE goals and CO2 caps to seize their interplays and propose a methodology to rank the resulting equilibriums in terms of environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency. We show that: only modest levels of VRE develop without subsidies regardless the level of the CO2 cap; technical externalities create trade-offs between VRE penetration and environmental effectiveness; new flexibility technologies may correct or exacerbate these externalities, impacting effectiveness, costs, and coherence of such packages, requiring a sensitive target hierarchization and fine-tuning of such instruments.
AbrellJanKoschMirjamRauschSebastian (2019). “Carbon Abatement with Renewables: Evaluating Wind and Solar Subsidies in Germany and Spain.” Journal of Public Economics169: 172–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpu-beco.2018.11.007.
2.
AbrellJanRauschSebastianStreitbergerClemens (2019a). “Buffering Volatility: Storage Investments and Technology-Specific Renewable Energy Support.” Energy Economics104463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.07.023.
3.
AbrellJanRauschSebastianStreitbergerClemens (2019b). “The Economics of Renewable Energy Support.” Journal of Public Economics176: 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.06.002.
4.
ADEME (2017). “L’éffacement de La Consommation Electrique En France.” Paris, France.
5.
BrijsTomHuppmannDanielSiddiquiSaulehBelmansRonnie (2016). “Auction-Based Allocation of Shared Electricity Storage Resources through Physical Storage Rights.” Journal of Energy Storage7: 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2016.05.009.
6.
BruninxKennethDelarueErikErgunHakanMayKristofVan Den BerghKennethVan HertemDirk (2016). “Determining the Impact of Renewable Energy on Balancing Costs, Back up Costs, Grid Costs and Subsidies.” Leuven.
7.
BurgerScott P.KnittelChristopher R.Perez-ArriagaIgnacio J.SchneiderIanvom ScheidtFrederik (2020). “The Efficiency and Distributional Effects of Alternative Residential Electricity Rate Designs.” The Energy Journal41(1). https://doi.org/10.3386/w25570.
8.
D’haeseleerWilliamde VriesLaurensKangChongqingDelarueErik (2017). “Flexibility Challenges for Energy Markets.” IEEE Power and Energy Magazine (February): 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPE.2016.2629742.
9.
DebiaSébastienPineauPierre OlivierSiddiquiAfzal S. (2019). “Strategic Use of Storage: The Impact of Carbon Policy, Resource Availability, and Technology Efficiency on a Renewable-Thermal Power System.” Energy Economics80(2019): 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.12.006.
10.
DelarueErikVan den BerghKenneth (2016). “Carbon Mitigation in the Electric Power Sector under Cap-and-Trade and Renewables Policies.” Energy Policy92(January): 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.028.
11.
FrippMatthiasWiserRyan H. (2008). “Effects of Temporal Wind Patterns on the Value of Wind-Generated Electricity in California and the Northwest.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems23(2): 477–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/TP-WRS.2008.919427.
12.
GerbauletC.von HirschhausenC.KemfertC.LorenzC.OeiP.Y. (2019). “European Electricity Sector Decarbonization under Different Levels of Foresight.” Renewable Energy141: 973–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.099.
13.
GiuliettiMonicaGrossiLuigiBauteElisa TrujilloWatersonMichael (2018). “Analyzing the Potential Economic Value of Energy Storage.” The Energy Journal39(1): 101–22. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.39.si1.mgiu.
14.
HeXianDelarueErikD’haeseleerWilliamGlachantJean-Michel (2011). “A Novel Business Model for Aggregating the Values of Electricity Storage.” Energy Policy39: 1575–85.
15.
HirthLion (2013). “The Market Value of Variable Renewables. The Effect of Solar Wind Power Variability on Their Relative Price.” Energy Economics38: 218–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004.
16.
HirthLion (2015). “The Optimal Share of Variable Renewables.” The Energy Journal36(1): 127–62. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.1.6.
17.
HirthLion (2016). “The Benefits of Flexibility: The Value of Wind Energy with Hydropower.” Applied Energy181: 210–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.039.
18.
HirthLionUeckerdtFalkoEdenhoferOttmar (2016). “Why Wind Is Not Coal: On the Economics of Electricity Generation.” The Energy Journal37(3): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.3.lhir.
19.
IEA/NEA (2010). “Projected Costs of Generating Electricity.” Paris, France. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264084315-en.
20.
IEA/NEA (2015). “Projected Cost of Generation Electricity.” https://doi.org/10.1787/cost_electricity-2015-en.
21.
JoskowPaul L. (2011). “Comparing the Cost of Intermittent and Dispatchable Electricity Generation Technologies.” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings101(3): 238–41. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.1013.238.
22.
KepplerJan HorstComettoMarco (2012). “System Effects in Low-Carbon Electricity Systems.” Paris.
23.
NewberyDavid M.ReinerDavid M.RitzRobert A. (2019). “The Political Economy of a Carbon Price Floor for Power Generation.” The Energy Journal40(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.40.1.dnew.
24.
PerceboisJacquesPommeretStanislas (2019). “Storage Cost Induced by a Large Substitution of Nuclear by Intermittent Renewable Energies: The French Case.” Energy Policy135(September): 111067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2019.111067.
25.
RTE (2017). “Reseaux Electriques Intelligents. Valeur Économique, Environnementale et Deploiement d’ensemble.” Paris, France.
26.
SETIS and JRC (2014). “Energy Technology Reference Indicator (ETRI) Projections for 2010-2050.” Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2790/057687.
27.
SioshansiRamteen (2016). “Using Storage-Capacity Rights to Overcome the Cost-Recovery Hurdle for Energy Storage.” IEEE Transactions on Power SystemsPP(99): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2607153.
28.
Sisternes deFernando J.JenkinsJesse D.BotterudAudun (2016). “The Value of Energy Storage in Decarbonizing the Electricity Sector.” Applied Energy175: 368–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.014.
29.
TaylorJoshua A. (2015). “Financial Storage Rights.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems30(2): 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2339016.
30.
TheilH.BattenA.P.Van den BogaardP.J.M. (1964). Optimal decision rules for government and industry. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
31.
TinbergenJ. (1952). On the Theory of Economic Policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1373971900100800.
32.
VillavicencioManuel (2017a). “A Capacity Expansion Model Dealing with Balancing Requirements, Short-Term Operations and Long-Run Dynamics.” 25. Chaire European Electricity Markets. Paris, France.
33.
VillavicencioManuel (2017b). “Analyzing the Optimal Development of Electricity Storage in Electricity Markets with High Variable Renewable Energy Shares.” PSL Research University.
34.
VillavicencioManuel (2017c). “The Value of Electric Energy Storage in Electricity Systems with High Shares of Wind and Solar PV: The Case of France in the Energy Transition.” 28. Chaire European Electricity Markets. Paris, France.
35.
ZerrahnAlexanderSchillWolf-Peter (2015). “On the Representation of Demand-Side Management in Power System Models.” Energy84(May): 840–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.037.
36.
ZerrahnAlexanderSchillWolf PeterKemfertClaudia (2018). “On the Economics of Electrical Storage for Variable Renewable Energy Sources.” European Economic Review108: 259–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.07.004.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
