The study of the financial repercussions of low-carbon policy has focused mainly on stocks, leaving bonds out of the picture. The objective of this paper is to assess the impact of low-carbon policy upon European bond returns. This is done by extending the Fama and French two factor model for bonds with an EU-ETS participation factor: GMC (Green minus Carbon). This paper makes four contributions. Firstly, it provides a statistically highly significant measure of the sensitivity of bond portfolio returns to the GMC factor. Secondly, it shows the presence of a green premium in the European bond market in between 2008 and 2018. Thirdly, evidence is found that the addition of an environmental factor improves the performance of the original model. Fourthly, the carbon stress test put forward is able to indicate the effects of a plausible but more severe average EU-ETS carbon price on bond returns.
AcharyaV.V.AmihudY.BharathS.T. (2013). “Liquidity risk of corporate bond returns: conditional approach.” Journalof Financial Economics110(2): 358–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.002.
2.
Bank of England Prudential Regulation Authority (2015). The impact of climate change on the UK insurance sector. A Climate Change Adaptation Report by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Retrieved from https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2015/the-impact-of-climate-change-on-the-uk-insurance-sector.
3.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2009). Principles for sound stress testing practices and supervision. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs155.htm.
4.
BensoussanA.GueganD.TapieroC.S. (2014). Future Perspectives in Risk Models and Finance. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07524-2.
5.
BorioC.DrehmannM.TsatsaronisK. (2014). “Stress-testing macro stress testing: does it live up to expectations?” Journal of Financial Stability12: 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfs.2013.06.001.
6.
BreuerT.JandačkaM.MencíaJ.SummerM. (2012). “A systematic approach to multi-period stress testing of portfolio credit risk.” Journal of Banking & Finance36(2): 332–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjbankfin.2011.07.009.
7.
BrouwersR.SchoubbenF.Van HulleC.Van UytbergenS. (2016). “The initial impact of EU ETS verification events on stock prices.” Energy policy94: 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.006.
8.
CaldecottB.McDanielsJ. (2014). Financial dynamics of the environment: Risks, impacts, and barriers to resilience. Oxford: Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment.
9.
CaldecottB.KruitwagenL.DericksG.TullochD.J.KokI.MitchellJ. (2016). Stranded Assets and Thermal Coal: An analysis of environment-related risk exposure. Oxford: Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2724550.
10.
CarneyM. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon—climate change and financial stability. Retrieved from https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2015/breaking-the-tragedy-of-the-horizon-climate-change-and-financial-stability.
11.
ChanH.S.LiS.ZhangF. (2013). “Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme.” Energy Policy63: 1056–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.enpol.2013.09.032.
12.
ChevallierJ. (2009). “Carbon futures and macroeconomic risk factors: A view from the EU ETS.” Energy Economics31(4): 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.02.008.
13.
ComminsN.LyonsS.SchiffbauerM.TolR.S.J (2011). “Climate Policy & Corporate Behavior.” The Energy Journal32(4): 51–68. https://www.iaee.org/en/publications/ejarticle.aspx?id=2436id=2436. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No4-4.
14.
Committee on the Global Financial System (2005). Stress Testing at Major Financial Institutions: survey results and practice. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs24.htm.
15.
CookJ.OreskesN.DoranP.T.AndereggW.R.VerheggenB.MaibachE.W.RiceK. (2016). “Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming.” Environmental Research Letters11(4): 048002. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002/meta. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002.
16.
DellM.JonesB.F.OlkenB.A. (2014). “What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature.” Journal of Economic Literature52(3): 740–798. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.52.3.740. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.3.740.
17.
DemirelP.KesidouE. (2011). “Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: Government policies and firm motivations.” Ecological Economics70(8): 1546–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.019.
18.
Energy Information Administration (2017). International Energy Outlook 2017. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/out-looks/ieo/.
19.
EngelS.PagiolaS.WunderS. (2008). “Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues.” Ecological Economics65(4): 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.
20.
European Commission (2015). EU-ETS handbook. Retrieved from European Commission website: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/publications_enhttps://ec.europa.eu/clima/publications.
21.
FamaE. F.FrenchK.R. (1993). “Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics33(1): 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5.
FayM.HallegatteS.Vogt-SchilbA.RozenbergJ.NarlochU.KerrT. (2015). Decarbonizing development: Three steps to a zero-carbon future. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0479-3.
24.
GebhardtW.R.HvidkjaerS.SwaminathanB. (2005). “The cross-section of expected corporate bond returns: Betas or characteristics?” Journal of Financial Economics75: 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfineco.2004.04.002.
25.
GibbonsM.R.RossS.A.ShankenJ. (1989). “A test of the efficiency of a given portfolio.” Econometrica57(5): 1121–1152. https://wwwjstor.org/stable/1913625?seq=1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913625.
26.
GӧrgenM.JacobA.NerlingerM.RiordanR.RohlederM.WilkensM. (2017). Carbon risk. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2930897. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2930897.
27.
Graff Zivin, J. and M. Neidell (2014). “Temperature and the allocation of time: Implications for climate change.” Journal of Labour Economics32(1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/671766.
28.
HallegatteS.FayM.BangaloreM.KaneT.BonzanigoL. (2015). Shock waves: managing the impacts of climate change onpoverty. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0673-5.
29.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018). Global Warming of 1.5ଌ. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/.
30.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. https://doi.org/10.1017/CB09781107415416.
31.
Jaraite-KažukauskeJ.DiC. Maria (2016). “Did the EU ETS Make a Difference? An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data.” The Energy Journal37(1). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.2.jjar.
32.
JongT.CouwenbergO.WoerdmanE. (2014). “Does EU emissions trading bite? An event study.” Energy Policy69: 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.007.
33.
KochN. (2014). “Dynamic linkages among carbon, energy and financial markets: a smooth transition approach.” Applied Economics46(7): 715–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.854301.
34.
KoliaiL. (2016). “Extreme risk modeling: An EVT pair copulas approach for financial stress tests.” Journal of Banking & Finance70: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjbankfin.2016.02.004.
35.
LinH.WangJ.WuC. (2011). “Liquidity risk and expected corporate bond returns.” Journal of Financial Economics99(3): 628–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjfineco.2010.10.004.
36.
LittermanR.ScheinkmanJ. (1991). “Common factors affecting bond returns.” The Journal of Fixed Income1(1): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.3905/jfi.1991.692347.
37.
Mansanet Bataller, M. and A. Pardo Tornero (2008). CO2 Prices and Portfolio Management. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1156975. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1156975.
38.
MarinG.MarinoM.PellegrinC. (2017). “The Impact of the European Emission Trading Scheme on Multiple Measures of Economic Performance.” Environmental and Resource Economics71: 551–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-017-0173-0.
MorenoB.PereiraP. da Silva (2016). “How do Spanish polluting sectors’ stock market returns react to European Union allowances prices? A panel data approach.” Energy103(15): 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.094.
41.
OestreichA.M.TsiakasI. (2015). “Carbon emissions and stock returns: Evidence from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme.” Journal of Banking & Finance58: 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/jjbankfin.2015.05.005.
42.
PycroftJ.AbrellJ.CiscarJ.C. (2016). “The global impacts of extreme sea-level rise: a comprehensive economic assessment.” Environmental and Resource Economics64(2): 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9866-9.
43.
QuagliarielloM. (2009). Stress-testing, he banking system: methodologies and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635618.
44.
RavinaA.KaffelR. Hentati (2019). The impact of low-carbon policy on stock returns. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3444168. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3444168.
45.
SchoenmakerD.Van TilburgR. (2016). Financial risks and opportunities in the time of climate change. Brussels: Bruegel.
46.
SternN. H. (2007). The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434.
47.
TianY.AkimovA.RocaE.WongV. (2015). “Does the carbon market help or hurt the stock price of electricity companies? Further evidence from the European context.” Journal of Cleaner Production112(2):1619–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.028.
48.
United Nations (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/pro-cess/the-convention/what-is-the-convention/status-of-ratification-of-the-convention.
49.
WagnerG.WeitzmanM.L. (2016). Climate shock: the economic consequences of a hotter planet. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400880768.
50.
WinebrakeJ.J.FarrellA.E.BernsteinM.A. (1995). “The clean air act’s sulfur dioxide emissions market: Estimating the costs of regulatory and legislative intervention.” Resource and Energy Economics17(3): 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-7655(95)00006-J.
51.
ZenghelisD.SternN. (2016). The importance of looking forward to manage risks: submission to the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publication/the-importance-of-looking-forward-to-manage-risks-submission-to-the-task-force-on-climate-related-financial-disclosures/.
52.
ZhangY.WeiY. (2010). “An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect.” Applied Energy87(6): 1804–1814. https://doi.org/10.10167j.apenergy.2009.12.019.
53.
ZhouZ.XiaoT.ChenX.WangC. (2016). “A carbon risk prediction model for Chinese heavy-polluting industrial enterprises based on support vector machine.” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals89: 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.12.001.
54.
ZhuH.TangY.PengC.YuK. (2018). “The heterogeneous response of the stock market to emission allowance price: evidence from quantile regression.” Carbon Management9(3): 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2018.1475802.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
