This study examines carbon spot and futures price relationships and the dynamics of the carbon term structure in the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) between 2005-2014. Using spot and futures prices, we calculate an implied cost of carry. According to received theory, the cost of carry is—with some ex-ceptions—just the opportunity cost of money, so that the term structure of the cost of carry should exactly equal the term structure interest rates. However, we show that spot carbon allowances were originally expensive relative to futures, but since late 2008 the situation reversed and spot carbon allowances have been persistently cheap relative to futures prices. This dramatic shift coincides with the onset of the global financial crisis in late 2008 and the ongoing European banking crisis of 2010-2013.
BenzE.TrückS. (2009). Modeling the Price Dynamics of CO2 Emission Allowances. Energy Economics31, 1, 4-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2008.07.003.
2.
Bank of International Settlements (2005). Zero-Coupon Yield Curves, Technical Documentation, BIS Paper No. 25.
3.
BorakSHärdleW.TrückS.WeronR. (2006). Convenience Yields for CO2 Emission Allowance Futures Contracts, SFB 649 Discussion Paper 2006-076.
4.
BredinD.MuckleyC. (2011). An Emerging Equilibrium in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Energy Economics, 33, 353-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.06.009.
5.
BredinD.ChenJ.MuckleyC. (2014a). Nascent Information Assimilation in the European Carbon Market, UCD Working Paper.
6.
BredinD.HydeS.MuckleyC. (2014b). A Microstructure Analysis of the Carbon Finance Market, International Review of Financial Analysis, 34, 222-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2014.03.003.
7.
BrennanM.J. (1958). The Supply of Storage, American Economic Review, 48, 50-72.
8.
ChevallierJ. (2009). Modelling the Convenience Yield in Carbon Prices Using Daily and Realized Measures, International Review of Applied Financial Issues and Economics, 1, 1, 56-73.
9.
ChevallierJ. (2010). Modeling Risk Premia in CO2 Allowances Spot and Futures Prices. Economic Modelling27, 3, 717-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.01.012.
10.
CloS.BattlesSZoppoliP. (2013), Policy Options to Improve the Effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: A Multi-criteria Analysis, Energy Policy, 57, 477-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.015.
11.
DieboldF.X.LiC. (2006). Forecasting the Term Structure of Government Bond Yields. Journal of Econometrics130, 337-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.03.005.
12.
EC. (2013). The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): Factsheet, October.
13.
European Central Bank (2008). The New Euro Area Yield Curves, Monthly Bulletin, February, 95-103.
14.
EllermanD.BuchnerB. (2007). The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1, 1, 66-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem003.
15.
EllermanD.JoskowP. (2008). The European Union’s Emissions Trading System in Perspective, Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Washington, D.C., (May). Available at: http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/EU-ETS-InPerspective-Report.pdf.
16.
EllermanD.ConveryF.de PerthuisC. (2010). Pricing Carbon The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17.
EllermanD.MarcantoniniC.ZaklanA. (2014). The EU ETS: Eight Years and Counting, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Climate Policy Research Unit, RCAS 2014/14.
18.
GregoryA.HansenB.E. (1996a). Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts, Journal of Econometrics, 70, 99-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(69)41685-7.
19.
GregoryA.HansenB.E. (1996b). Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime and Trend Shifts, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58, 555-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1996.mp58003008.x.
20.
GrosjeanG.AcworthW.FlachslandC.MarschinskiR. (2014). After Monetary Policy, Climate Policy: Is Delegation the Key to EU ETS Reform?, Climate Policy, MCC Working Paper February.
21.
JohansenS. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control12, 231-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3.
22.
Johansen S. (2002). A Small Sample Correction for the Test of Cointegrating Rank in the Vector Autoregressive Model, Econometrica70, 1929-1961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00358.
23.
JoyeuxR.MilunovichG. (2010). Testing Market Efficiency in the EU Carbon Futures Market, Applied Financial Economics, 20, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09603101003636220.
24.
KalaitzoglouaI.IbrahimbB.M. (2013). Does Order Flow in the European Carbon Futures Market Reveal Information?, Journal of Financial Markets, 16, 3, 604-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2012.11.002.
25.
KochN.FussS.GrosjeanG.EdenhoferO. (2014). Causes of the EU ETS Price Drop: Recession, CDM, Renewable Policies or a Bit of Everything?New Evidence, Energy Policy, 73, 676-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.024.
26.
LumsdaineR. L.PapellD. H. (1997). Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit Root Hypothesis, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 2, 212-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791.
27.
MadalenaM.PinhoC. (2011). Risk Premia in CO2 Allowances: Spot and Futures Prices in the EEX Market. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal22, 5, 550-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777831111159699.
28.
NeuhoffK.SchoppA.BoydR.StelmakhK.VasaA. (2012). Banking of Surplus Emissions Allowances: Does the Volume Matter?, Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1196, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
29.
NelsonC.R.SiegelA.F. (1987). Parsimonious Modelling of the Yield Curve, Journal of Business, 60, 473-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/296409.
30.
NieldK.PereiraR. (2011). Fraud on the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Effects, Vulnerabilites and Regu-laritory Reform, European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 20, 6, 255-289.
31.
ParsonsJ. E.EllermanA.D.FeilhauerS. (2009). Designing a U.S. Market for CO2, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 21, 79-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2009.00218.x.
32.
PhillipsP.PerronP. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression, Biometrica, 75, 335-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335.
33.
PindyckR. S. (2001). The Dynamics of Commodity Spot and Futures Markets: A Primer, The Energy Journal, 22, 3, 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol22-No3-1.
34.
ShambaughJ. C. (2012). The Euro’s Three Crises, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 157-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/eca.2012.0006.
35.
TrückS.HärdleW.WeronR. (2012). The Relationship Between Spot and Futures CO2 Emission Allowance Prices in the EU ETS, mimeo.
36.
Uhrig-HomburgM.WagnerM. (2009) Futures Price Dynamics of CO2 Emission Allowances: An Empirical Analysis of the Trial Period, Journal of Derivatives, 17, 2, 73-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/JOD.2009.17.2.073.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
