This paper analyses bidder behaviour in the German photovoltaic (PV) auction pilot. It uses a novel approach combining insights from data analysis and decision theory to optimise an agent-based simulation model. We model both a uniform pricing (UP) scheme, a pay-as-bid (PAB) scheme, and a benchmark case, where agents adapt their bidding strategy. The findings are contrasted with empirical auction outcomes. The comparison shows that, especially in the early rounds, bid prices were above the costs—possibly due to uncertainties and false expectations concerning competition. This is particularly visible in the first round. Adapting their expectations to a higher competition level, bidders in the pay-as-bid simulation subsequently decrease their bids. From simulating a separate auction for arable land bidders, we see that this bidder type reduces support costs substantially and that an implicitly discriminatory auction yields more aggressive bids and can induce further cost reductions.
AhsanullahM.NevzorovV.B.ShakilM. (2013). An Introduction to Order Statistics. Springer, New York ISBN 978-9491216-82-4. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-91216-83-1.
2.
AnatolitisV.WelischM. (2017). “Putting Renewable Energy Auctions into Action—An Agent-Based Model of Onshore Wind Power Auctions in Germany.” Energy Policy110: 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.024.
3.
AusubelL.M.CramtonP.PyciaM.RostekM.WeretkaM. (2014). “Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-Unit Auctions.” The Review of Economic Studies81: 1366-1400. first published online: July 8,2014. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu023.
4.
Bayerische Staatsregierung (2017). “Verordnung über Gebote für Freiflächenanlagen” in “Bayerisches Gesetz- und Verordnungs-blatt,” 4: 31-32. Available at: https://www.verkuendung-bayern.de/files/gvbl/2017/04/gvbl-2017-04.pdf.
5.
BowerJ.BunnD. (2001). “Experimental analysis of the efficiency of uniform-price versus discriminatory auctions in the England and Wales electricity market.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control25(3): 561-592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(00)00036-1.
6.
Bundesnetzagentur (2016). “Gebotstermin 1. Dezember 2016.” Published online. Available at: https://www.bundesnet-zagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/ElektrizitaetundGas/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Ausschreibungen/Solaranlagen/Been-deteAusschreibungen/Ausschreibungen2015_2016/Gebotstermin_01_12_2016/gebotstermin_01_12_2016_node.html.
7.
Bundestag (2017). “EEG 2017.” Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/eeg_2014/BJNR106610014.html.
8.
del Rio, P. (2017). “Designing auctions for renewable electricity support. Best practices from around the world.” Energy for Sustainable Development41: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.05.006.
9.
Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag GmbH (2015). “2016: Bis Zu Zehn PV-Anlagen Auf Ack- erflächen Erlaubt.” Published online. Available at: https://www.agrarheute.com/energie/2016-zehn-pv-anlagen-ackerflaechen-erlaubt-440610.
HailuA.RolfeJ.WindleJ.GreinerR. (2011). “Auction Design and Performance: An Agent-Based Simulation with Endogenous Participation.” In “Agents and Artificial Intelligence,” volume 129 of Communications in Computer and Information Science Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg ISBN 978-3-642-19889-2 978-3-642-19890-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19890-8.
12.
HaufeM.-C.EhrhartK.-M. (2018). “Auctions for renewable energy support—Suitability, design, and first lessons learned.” Energy Policy121: 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.027.
13.
KreissJ.EhrhartK.-M.HaufeM.-C. (2017). “Appropriate design of auctions for renewable energy support—Prequali-fications and penalties.” Energy Policy101: 512-520https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.007.
14.
KreissJ.EhrhartK.-M.HaufeM.-C.Rosenlund SoysalE. (2019). “Different cost perspectives for renewable energy support: Assessment of technology-neutral and discriminatory auctions.” doi: http://games.econ.kit.edu/downloads/TNandDiscriminatoryREAuctions_KrEhHaSR.pdf working paper.
15.
KyliliA.FokaidesP.A. (2015). “Competitive Auction Mechanisms for the Promotion Renewable Energy Technologies: The Case of the 50MW Photovoltaics Projects in Cyprus.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews42: 226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.022.
16.
Land Baden-Württemberg (2017). “Verordnung der Landesregierung zur Öffnung der Ausschreibung für Photovoltaik-Frei-flächenanlagen für Gebote auf Acker- und Grünlandflächen in benachteiligten Gebieten (Freflächenöffnungsverordnung - FFÖ-VO).” In “Gesetzblatt für Baden-Württemberg,” 6 129-130. Available at: http://www.landesrecht-bw.de/jportal/portal/t/a54/page/bsbawueprod.psml?doc.hl=1&doc.id=VB-BW-GBl2017129-2&documentnumber=4&numberofre-sults=15000&doctyp=Verkuendungsblatt%3Abw-gbl&showdoccase=1&doc.part=D¶mfromHL=true#focuspoint.
17.
LykourisT.SyrgkanisV.TardosE. (2016). “Learning and Efficiency in Games with Dynamic Population.” In “Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms,” SODA ’16 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA ISBN 978-1-611974-33-1, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611974331.h9.
18.
MaskinE.RileyJ. (2000). “Asymmetric Auctions.” The Review of Economic Studies67(3): 413-438. ISSN 00346527, 1467937X. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00137.
19.
MilgromP.R.WeberR.J. (2000). “A theory of auctions and competitive bidding II.” In “The Economic Theory of Auctions,” volume 2 Edward Elgar Cheltenham, UK, 179-194.
20.
MizutaH.SteiglitzK.Special ACM Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling (2000). “Agent-Based Simulation of Dynamic Online Auctions.” In “Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation.” Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA, ISBN 978-0-7803-6582-7, oCLC: 809806180.
21.
MoraD.IslamM.SoysalE.R.KitzingL.BlancoA.L.A.ForsterS.TiedemannS.WigandF. (2017). “Experiences with Auctions for Renewable Energy Support.” IEEE, ISBN 978-1-5090-5499-2, 1-6. doi:10.1109/EEM.2017.7981922. https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981922.
22.
pvXchange Trading GmbH (2017). “PV PriceIndex.” Published online. Available at: http://www.pvxchange.com/priceindex/Default.aspx?langTag=de-DE.
23.
WeberR.J. (1983). “Multiple-Object Auctions.” In M. Shubik, R.M. Stark, and R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans (editors), “Auctions, Bidding, and Contracting: Uses and Theory,” chapter Issues in Theory of Auctions New York University Press, 165-191.
24.
WelischM. (2018). “The Importance of Penalties and Pre-Qualifications: A Model-Based Assessment of the UK Renewables Auction Scheme.” Economics of Energy &Environmental Policy7(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.7.2.mwel.
25.
WelischM. (2019). “Multi-Unit Renewables Auctions for Small Markets—Designing the Danish Multi-Technology Auction Scheme.” Renewable Energy131: 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.044.
26.
WigandF.FörsterS.AmazoA.TiedemannS. (2016). “Auctions for Renewable Energy Support: Lessons Learnt from International Experiences.” Available at: http://auresproject.eu/sites/aures.eu/files/media/documents/aures_wp4_synthesis_report.pdf.
27.
WilsonR. B. (1969). “Communications to the Editor—Competitive Bidding with Disparate Information.” Management Science15(7): 446-452. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.15.7.446.
28.
WinklerJ.MagoschM.RagwitzM. (2018). “Effectiveness and Efficiency of Auctions for Supporting Renewable Elec-tricity—What Can We Learn from Recent Experiences?” Renewable Energy119: 473-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.071.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
