This paper estimates consumer savings, CO2 emissions reductions, and price effects from increasing demand response (DR) dispatch in the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) electricity market. To quantify market effects, we develop a dynamic supply and demand model to explore a range of DR deployment scenarios. The study is motivated by the existence of regulatory and market rule barriers to market-based deployment of DR resources in the MISO region. We show annual consumer savings from increased market-based DR can vary from $1.3 million to $17.6 million under typical peak operating conditions, depending on the amount of DR resources available for market dispatch and the frequency of deployment. Consumer savings and other market effects increase exponentially during atypical periods with tight supply and high prices. Additionally, we find that DR deployment often reduces CO2 emissions, but the magnitude of emissions reductions varies depending on the emissions content of marginal generation at the time and location of deployment. The results of this study suggest regulators and other stakeholders should focus policy efforts to reducing regulatory barriers to DR deployment in wholesale markets, particularly in locations that experience high price spikes, to improve market efficiency and achieve cost savings for consumers.
AlbadiM.H.El-SaadanyE.F. (2008). “A summary of demand response in electricity markets.” Electric Power Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2008.04.002.
3.
BorensteinS.HollandS. (2005). “On the efficiency of competitive electricity markets with time-invariant retail prices.” RAND Journal of Economics Journal of Economics1(3): 469-493. Retrieved from http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/boren-ste/download/Rand05RTP.pdf.
4.
BoßmannT.EserE.J. (2016). “Model-based assessment of demand-response measures—A comprehensive literature review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews57: 1637-1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.031.
5.
BraithwaitS.D.EakinK. (2002). “The role of demand response in electric power market design.” Edison Electric Institute (October). Retrieved from http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/uploads/1/sgnr_2007_12014.pdf.
6.
BushnellJ.HobbsB.F.WolakF.A. (2009). “When It Comes to Demand Response, Is FERC Its Own Worst Enemy?” Electricity Journal22(8): 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2009.08.004.
7.
BuzoianuM.BrockwellA.SeppiD. (2005). “A dynamic supply-demand model for electricity prices.” Carnegie Mellon University Department of Statistics Working Paper. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/statistics/134.
8.
California Independent System Operator (2018). “Demand response net benefits test.” Retrieved fromhttp://www.caiso.com/informed/Pages/StakeholderProcesses/CompletedClosedStakeholderInitiatives/DemandResponseNetBenefitsTest.aspx.
9.
CappersP.GoldmanC.KathanD. (2010). “Demand response in U.S. electricity markets: Empirical evidence.” Energy35(4): 1526-1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.029.
10.
CappersP.MacDonaldJ.GoldmanC.MaO. (2013). “An assessment of market and policy barriers for demand response providing ancillary services in U.S. electricity markets.” Energy Policy62: 1031-1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.003.
11.
ChaoH.DePillisM. (2013). “Incentive effects of paying demand response in wholesale electricity markets.” Journal of Regulatory Economics43(3): 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-012-9208-1.
12.
ChenX.KleitA.N. (2016). “Money for Nothing? Why FERC Order 745 Should have Died.” The Energy Journal37(2). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.2.xche.
13.
DahlkeS. (2018). Data and code for “Consumer savings, price, and emissions impacts of increasing demand response in the Midcontinent electricity market.” Open Science Framework. Retrieved from https://osf.io/6r5cw/.
14.
De JongheC.HobbsB.F.BelmansR. (2012). “Optimal generation mix with short-term demand response and wind penetration.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems27(2): 830-839. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2174257.
15.
Potomac Economics (2017). 2016 State of the Market Report for the MISO Electricity Markets. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/Library/Repository/Report/IMM/2016StateoftheMarketReport.pdf.
16.
EldaliF.HardyT.CorbinC.PinneyD.JavidM. (2016). “Cost-benefit analysis of Demand Response programs incorporated in Open Modeling Framework.” In IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting. Boston. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741264.
17.
EryilmazD.SmithT.M.HomansF.R. (2017). “Price Responsiveness in Electricity Markets: Implications for Demand Response in the Midwest.” The Energy Journal38(1): https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.38.1.dery.
18.
FaruquiA.HajosA.HledikR.M.NewellS.A. (2009). “Fostering economic demand response in the Midwest ISO.” Energy35(4): 1544-1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.09.014.
19.
FaruquiA.GeorgeS.S. (2002). “The value of dynamic pricing in mass markets.” Electricity Journal15(6): 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(02)00330-5.
20.
FaruquiA.HledikR.NewellS.PfeifenbergerH. (2007). The Power of 5 Percent. Electricity Journal 20(8): 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2007.08.003.
21.
HoganW. W. (2010). Demand Response Compensation, Net Benefits and Cost Allocation: Comments. The Electricity Journal, 23(9): 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TEJ.2010.10.002.
22.
HollandS. P.MansurE.T. (2006). The Short-Run Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets. The Energy Journal, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol27-No4-6.
23.
KahnA. E. (2010). Affidavit, Demand Response Compensation in Organized Wholesale Markets. U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
24.
LauE. T.YangQ.StokesL.TaylorG.A.ForbesA.B.ClarksonP.Livina... V.N. (2015). Carbon savings in the UK demand side response programmes. Applied Energy, 159, 478-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.123.
25.
LeautierT. O. (2014). Is Mandating “Smart Meters” Smart? The Energy Journal. Retrieved from https://www.iaee.org/en/publications/ejarticle.aspx?id=2851.
26.
LovinsA. B. (1985). Saving gigabucks with negawatts. Public Utility Fortnightly, 115:6. Retrieved from https://www.fort-nightly.com/fortnightly/1985/03/saving-gigabucks-negawatts-1985.
27.
MalabongaD. M. (2017). Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. Compliance Filing for Order 831. Retrieved from https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/file_list.asp?document_id=14569982.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2017). Net Benefits Price Threshold Information. Retrieved from https://old.misoenergy.org/Library/Repository/Report/DemandResponse/NetBenefitsPriceThreshold.pdf.
30.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2016). Business Practice Manual 010-r11 Sections 3.1.1.4 and 3.1.1.5. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/library/businesspracticesmanuals/Pages/BusinessPracticesManuals.aspx.
31.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2017). Tariff Module C Energy and Operating Reserve Markets.
32.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2017). LMR Performance During April 4th, 2017 Maximum Generation Event. Retrieved December 22, 2017, from https://www.misoenergy.org/Library/Repository/MeetingMaterial/Stakeholder/MSC/2017/20170713/20170713MSCItem07LMRDeploymentClarification.pdf.
33.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2017). Business practices manual: Resource adequacy. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/_layouts/MISO/ECM/Redirect.aspx?ID=19206.
34.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2015). Real-time fuel on the margin. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/Library/MarketReports/Pages/MarketReports.aspx.
35.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2016). Planning Resource Auction. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/PLANNING/RESOURCEADEQUACY/Pages/RAContruct.aspx.
36.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2014). MISO zones: Presentation to the Supply Adequacy Working Group.
37.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2015). Historical regional forecast and actual load. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/Library/MarketReports/Pages/MarketReports.aspx.
38.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2015). Real-time pricing report. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/Library/MarketReports/Pages/MarketReports.aspx.
39.
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (2015). Real-time cleared offers. Retrieved from https://www.misoenergy.org/Library/MarketReports/Pages/MarketReports.aspx.
40.
New York Independent System Operator (2011). NYISO Demand Response Net Benefits Test. Retrieved from http://www.nyiso.com/public/webdocs/markets_operations/market_data/demand_response/Demand_Response/Monthly_Net_Bene-fit_Offer_Floor/Compliance_Filing_Data/Net_Benefits_Test_Description-compliance_filing.pdf.
41.
PJM (2014). PJM Demand Side Response Overview. Retrieved from https://www.pjm.com/∼/media/training/pjm-demand-side-response-overview-v2.ashx.
42.
Potomac Economics (2017). 2016 State of the Market Report for the MISO Electricity Markets.
43.
RiversN.JaccardM. (2005). “Combining Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches To Energy-Economy Modeling Using Discrete Choice Methods.” The Energy Journal26(1): 83-106. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol26-No1-4.
44.
RiversN.JaccardM. (2011). Electric Utility Demand Side Management in Canada. The Energy Journal 32(4). https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-No4-5.
45.
SchweppeF. C.CaramanisM.C.TaborsD.R.BohnR.E. (1988). Spot Pricing of Electricity. Springer U.S.
46.
SmithA. M.BrownM.A. (2015). Demand response: A carbon-neutral resource? Energy 85: 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.02.067.
47.
Southwest Power Pool (2018). Net Benefits Test. Retrieved from https://www.spp.org/markets-operations/net-benefits-test/.
48.
TaylorT. N.SchwarzP.MCochellJ.E. (2005). 24/7 Hourly response to electricity real-time pricing with up to eight summers of experience. Journal of Regulatory Economics 27(3): 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-005-6623-6.
49.
The Brattle Group (2007). Quantifying Demand Response Benefits in PJM. Retrieved from http://brattle.com/system/pub-lications/pdfs/000/004/917/original/Quantifying_Demand_Response_Benefits_in_PJM_Jan_29_2007.pdf?1379343092.
50.
The Cadmus Group (2009). Process evaluation of Xcel Energy’s Saver’s Switch program. Retrieved from https://www.xcelen-ergy.com/staticfiles/xe/Regulatory/RegulatoryPDFs/DSM-Evaluation-Savers-Switch.pdf.
51.
U.S. Department of Energy (2016). Environment Baseline, Volume 1: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the U.S. Power Sector.
52.
U.S. Department of Energy (2006). Benefits of Demand Response in Electricity Markets and Recommendations for Achieving Them. Retrieved from https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/oeprod/DocumentsandMedia/DOE_Benefits_of_Demand_Re-sponse_in_Electricity_Markets_and_Recommendations_for_Achieving_Them_Report_to_Congress.pdf.
53.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2017). Annual Energy Outlook 2017: Availability of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Archive. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/info_nems_archive.php.
54.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2014). Form EIA-861 Annual Electric Power Industry Report Instructions.
55.
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016). Electric power sales, revenue, and energy efficiency Form EIA-861 detailed data files. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/.
56.
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2017). Order on Compliance 61,155. Retrieved from https://www.ferc.gov/CalendarFiles/20171109172524-ER17-1570-000.pdf.
57.
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2017). Midcontinent Independent System Operator Order 831 Compliance Order, Docket No. ER17-1570-000, Pub. L. No. 161 FERC 61,155.
58.
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2010). The DRIVE Model. Retrieved January 1, 2017, from https://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus-act/demand-response/dr-potential/action-plan.asp.
59.
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2009). A National Assessment of Demand Response Potential. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
60.
U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2011). Order No. 745: Demand Response Compensation in Organized Wholesale Energy Markets. Retrieved from https://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/Files/20110315105757-RM10-17-000.pdf.
61.
WellinghoffJ.MorenoffD.L. (2007). Recognizing the Importance of Demand Response: The Second Half of the Wholesale Electric Market Equation. Energy Law Journal 28(2): 389-419.
62.
WirlF. (2000). Lessons from utility conservation programs. The Energy Journal 21(1): 87-108. https://doi.org/10.2307/41322856.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
