A fierce debate rages on whether abundant natural gas is a bridge to a low-carbon future or a hindrance to long-term decarbonization. This paper uses a detailed energy-economic market equilibrium model to study the effects of an upper bound case of natural gas availability. We show that a market-driven abundant natural gas supply can provide substantial reductions in air pollution but does not considerably reduce CO2 emissions in the longer-term, especially relative to a moderate carbon price. However, we quantify large welfare benefits from abundant natural gas. The spatial disaggregation of our results allows for a clear picture of the distributional impacts of abundant natural gas under different carbon price scenarios, illustrating welfare gains by most regions regardless of whether there is carbon pricing, but substantial heterogeneity in the welfare gains.
AbramzonS.SamarasC.CurtrightA.LitovitzA.BurgerN. (2014). “Estimating the Consumptive use Costs of Shale Natural Gas Extraction on Pennsylvania Roadways.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems20(3): 06014001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000203.
2.
AuffhammerM. (2007). “The Rationality of EIA Forecasts Under Symmetric and Asymmetric Loss.” Resource and Energy Economics29(2): 102-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.05.001.
3.
AuffhammerM.SanstadA.H. (2011). “Energy Efficiency in the Residential and Commercial Sectors.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
4.
BanksJ.ForceC.A.T. (2008). “The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act - S. 2191: A Summary of Modeling Results from the National Energy Modeling System.” Boston, MA: Clean Air Task Force.
5.
BartikA.W.CurrieJ.GreenstoneM.KnittelC.R. (2016). “The Local Economic and Welfare Consequences of Hydraulic Fracturing.” https://ssrn.com/abstract=2692197.
6.
BernowS.DoughertyW.DuckworthM. (1997). “Quantifying the Impacts of a National, Tradable Renewables Portfolio Standard.” The Electricity Journal10(4): 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6190(97)80558-1.
7.
BordoffJ.HouserT. (2014). “American Gas to the Rescue?: The Impact of US LNG Exports on European Security and Russian Foreign Policy.” New York, NY: Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia University.
8.
BrownS.P.GabrielS.EggingR. (2010). “Abundant Shale Gas Resources: Some Implications for Energy Policy.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
9.
BrownS.P.KrupnickA. (2010). “Abundant Shale Gas Resources: Long-Term Implications for US Natural Gas Markets.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
10.
BrownS.P.KrupnickA.WallsM.A. (2009). “Natural Gas: A Bridge to a Low-Carbon Future.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
11.
CathlesL.M.BrownL.TaamM.HunterA. (2012). “A Commentary on “The Greenhouse-Gas Footprint of Natural Gas in Shale Formations” by RW Howarth, R. Santoro, and Anthony Ingraffea.” Climatic Change113(2): 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0333-0.
12.
CEA (2017). “Economic Report of the President.” Washington, DC: Council of Economic Advisers.
13.
ChenC.WiserR.MillsA.BolingerM. (2009). “Weighing the Costs and Benefits of State Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States: A Comparative Analysis of State-Level Policy Impact Projections.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews13(3): 552-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.01.005.
14.
CooperJ.StamfordL.AzapagicA. (2016). “Shale Gas: A Review of the Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability.” Energy Technology4(7): 772-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/ente.201500464.
15.
CoxM.BrownM.A.SunX. (2013). “Energy Benchmarking of Commercial Buildings: A Low-Cost Pathway Toward Urban Sustainability.” Environmental Research Letters8(3): 035018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035018.
16.
CurrieJ.GreenstoneM.MeckelK. (2017). “Hydraulic Fracturing and Infant Health: New Evidence from Pennsylvania.” Science Advances3(12): e1603021. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603021.
17.
DeyetteJ.ClemmerS. (2004). “The Colorado Renewable Energy Standard Ballot Initiative: Impacts on Jobs and the Economy.” Cambridge, MA:: Union of Concerned Scientists.
18.
EIA(2017a). Annual Energy Outlook 2017. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Energy Information Administration.
19.
EIA (2018). Annual Energy Outlook 2018. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Energy Information Administration.
20.
EIA(2017b). Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2017. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration.
21.
EIA (2009). The National Energy Modeling System: An Overview 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Energy Information Administration.
22.
EPA (2015). “Overview of the Clean Power Plan: Cutting Carbon Pollution from Power Plants.” Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
23.
FieldR.SoltisJ.MurphyS. (2014). “Air Quality Concerns of Unconventional Oil and Natural Gas Production.” Environmental Science: Processes &Impacts16(5): 954-969. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00081A.
24.
FischerC. (2010). “Renewable Portfolio Standards: When do they Lower Energy Prices?” The Energy Journal 31(1): 101119. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No1-5.
25.
FischerC.NewellR.G. (2008). “Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management55(2): 142-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001.
26.
GerardenT.ReederW.S.StockJ.H. (2016). “Federal Coal Program Reform, the Clean Power Plan, and the Interaction of Upstream and Downstream Climate Policies.” National Bureau of Economic Research No. w22214. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22214.
27.
GillinghamK. (2013). “The Economics of Fuel Economy Standards Versus Feebates.”: National Energy Policy Institute Working Paper.
28.
GoulderL.H. (2010). “Using Cap and Trade to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
29.
GrahamJ.IrvingJ.TangX.SellersS.CrispJ.HorwitzD.MuehlenbachsL.KrupnickA.CareyD. (2015). “Increased Traffic Accident Rates Associated with Shale Gas Drilling in Pennsylvania.” Accident Analysis &Prevention74: 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.003.
30.
GreenR.J.LéautierT. (2015). “Do Costs Fall Faster than Revenues? Dynamics of Renewables Entry into Electricity Markets.”: Toulouse School of Economics Working Paper.
31.
HausmanC.KelloggR. (2015). “Welfare and Distributional Implications of Shale Gas.” National Bureau of Economic Research No. w21115. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21115.
32.
HausmanC.MuehlenbachsL. (2018). “Price Regulation and Environmental Externalities.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Discussion Paper.
33.
HirthL. (2013). “The Market Value of Variable Renewables: The Effect of Solar Wind Power Variability on their Relative Price.” Energy Economics38: 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004.
34.
HirthL. (2015). “The Optimal Share of Variable Renewables: How the Variability of Wind and Solar Power Affects their Welfare-Optimal Deployment.” The Energy Journal36(1): 149-184. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.36.1.6.
35.
HolladayJ.S.LaRiviereJ. (2017). “The Impact of Cheap Natural Gas on Marginal Emissions from Electricity Generation and Implications for Energy Policy.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management85: 205-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.06.004.
36.
HollandS.P.HughesJ.E.KnittelC.R. (2009). “Greenhouse Gas Reductions Under Low Carbon Fuel Standards?” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 1(1): 106-146. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.1.1.106.
37.
HorowitzJ.LinnJ. (2015). “The Environmental Effects of Clean Energy Innovations Under Rate-Based Regulation.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
38.
HowarthR.W. (2015). “Methane Emissions and Climatic Warming Risk from Hydraulic Fracturing and Shale Gas Development: Implications for Policy.” Energy and Emission Control Technologies3: 45-54. https://doi.org/10.2147/EECT.S61539.
39.
HowarthR.W.SantoroR.IngraffeaA. (2011). “Methane and the Greenhouse-Gas Footprint of Natural Gas from Shale Formations.” Climatic Change106(4): 679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5.
40.
HuntingtonH. (2017). “Changing the Game? Emissions and Market Implications of New Natural Gas Supplies.” Stanford, CA: Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford University. https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/1411245. https://doi.org/10.2172/1411245.
41.
IEA (2016). World Energy Outlook 2016. Paris, France: International Energy Agency.
42.
IWG (2016). “Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order 12866.” Washington, DC: Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases, United States Government.
43.
JacksonR.B.VengoshA.CareyJ.W.DaviesR.J.DarrahT.H.O’sullivanF.PétronG. (2014). “The Environmental Costs and Benefits of Fracking.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources39: 327-362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-031113-144051.
44.
JaramilloP.MullerN.Z. (2016). “Air Pollution Emissions and Damages from Energy Production in the US: 2002-2011.” Energy Policy90: 202-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.035.
45.
JohnsenR.LaRiviereJ.WolffH. (2018). “Fracking, Coal, and Air Quality.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Forthcoming.
46.
JoskowP.L. (2013). “Natural Gas: From Shortages to Abundance in the United States.” The American Economic Review103(3): 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.338.
47.
KoomeyJ.G.WebberC.A.AtkinsonC.S.NichollsA. (2001). “Addressing Energy-Related Challenges for the US Buildings Sector: Results from the Clean Energy Futures Study.” Energy Policy29(14): 1209-1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00068-4.
48.
KrupnickA.J.McLaughlinD. (2011). “GDP, Consumption, Jobs, and Costs: Tracking the Effects of Energy Policy.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
49.
LeviM. (2013). “Climate Consequences of Natural Gas as a Bridge Fuel.” Climatic Change118(3-4): 609-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0658-3.
50.
LinnJ.MuehlenbachsL. (2018). “The Heterogeneous Impacts of Low Natural Gas Prices on Consumers and the Environment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.02.002.
51.
MasonC.F.MuehlenbachsL.A.OlmsteadS.M. (2015). “The Economics of Shale Gas Development.” Annual Review of Resource Economics7(1): 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125023.
52.
MauzerallD.L.SultanB.KimN.BradfordD.F. (2005). “NOx Emissions from Large Point Sources: Variability in Ozone Production, Resulting Health Damages and Economic Costs.” Atmospheric Environment39(16): 2851-2866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.12.041.
53.
McJeonH.EdmondsJ.BauerN.ClarkeL.FisherB.FlanneryB.P.HilaireJ.KreyV.MarangoniG.MiR. (2014). “Limited Impact on Decadal-Scale Climate Change from Increased use of Natural Gas.” Nature514(7523): 482-485. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13837.
54.
McLeodJ.D.BrinkmanG.L.MilfordJ.B. (2014). “Emissions Implications of Future Natural Gas Production and use in the US and in the Rocky Mountain Region.” Environmental Science &Technology48(22): 13036-13044. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5029537.
55.
MignoneB.K.ShowalterS.WoodF.McJeonH.SteinbergD. (2017). “Sensitivity of Natural Gas Deployment in the US Power Sector to Future Carbon Policy Expectations.” Energy Policy110: 518-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.en-pol.2017.08.012.
56.
MullerN.Z.MendelsohnR. (2009). “Efficient Pollution Regulation: Getting the Prices Right.” The American Economic Review99(5): 1714-1739. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.5.1714.
57.
MullerN.Z.MendelsohnR. (2007). “Measuring the Damages of Air Pollution in the United States.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management54(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.002.
58.
MullerN.Z.MendelsohnR.NordhausW. (2011). “Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy.” The American Economic Review101(5): 1649-1675. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.5.1649.
59.
NewellR.G.RaimiD. (2014). “Implications of Shale Gas Development for Climate Change.” Environmental Science &Technology48(15): 8360-8368. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4046154.
60.
NewellR.G.RaimiD. (2015). “Shale Public Finance: Local Government Revenues and Costs Associated with Oil and Gas Development.” National Bureau of Economic Research No. w21542. https://doi.org/10.3386/w21542.
61.
NicotJ.ScanlonB.R.ReedyR.C.CostleyR.A. (2014). “Source and Fate of Hydraulic Fracturing Water in the Barnett Shale: A Historical Perspective.” Environmental Science &Technology48(4): 2464-2471. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404050r.
62.
NogeeA.DeyetteJ.ClemmerS. (2007). “The Projected Impacts of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard.” The Electricity Journal20(4): 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2007.04.001.
63.
PalmerK.SweeneyR.AllaireM. (2010). “Modeling Policies to Promote Renewable and Low-Carbon Sources of Electricity.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
64.
PGC (2016). Potential Supply of Natural Gas in the United States. Golden, Colorado: Potential Gas Committee.
65.
ScottM.J.DirksJ.A.CortK.A. (2008). “The Value of Energy Efficiency Programs for US Residential and Commercial Buildings in a Warmer World.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change13(4): 307-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9115-4.
66.
ShearerC.BistlineJ.InmanM.DavisS.J. (2014). “The Effect of Natural Gas Supply on US Renewable Energy and CO2 Emissions.” Environmental Research Letters9(9): 094008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094008.
67.
SiikamäkiJ.KrupnickA. (2014). “Information and the Willingness to Pay to Reduce Shale Gas Risks.” Istanbul, Turkey: 5th World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists.
68.
SmallK.A. (2010). “Energy Policies for Automobile Transportation.” Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
69.
SpadaroJ.V.RablA. (2008). “Global Health Impacts and Costs due to Mercury Emissions.” Risk Analysis28(3): 603613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01041.x.
70.
WilkersonJ.T. (2014). “Economic and Distributional Impacts from Carbon Fee and Dividend Policies.” Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
71.
WinebrakeJ.J.SakvaD. (2006). “An Evaluation of Errors in US Energy Forecasts: 1982-2003.” Energy Policy34(18): 3475-3483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.07.018.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
