This paper discusses the use of tourist attractions in tourism efficiency analysis. Tourist attractions can be employed either as an input of the production technology or as an environmental factor in a two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis model. An empirical illustration to the case of Chinese provinces underlines that using tourist attractions in different ways can yield different rankings of the units in terms of efficiency. Recommendations for future research are then proposed.
AssafAGJosiassenA (2016) Frontier analysis: a state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Journal of Travel Research55(5): 612–627.
2.
AssafAGTsionasMG(2019) A review of research into performance modeling in tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research76: 266–277.
3.
BarrosCPBottiLPeypochN, et al. (2011) Performance of French destinations: tourism attraction perspectives. Tourism Management32(1): 141–146.
4.
BenitoBSolanaJLópezP (2014) Determinants of Spanish regions’ tourism performance: a two-stage, double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis. Tourism Economics20(5): 987–1012.
5.
BogetoftPOttoL (2011) Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York: Springer.
6.
BogetoftPOttoL (2020) Benchmarking with DEA and SFA, R package version 0.29.
7.
BottiLPeypochNRobinotE, et al. (2009) Tourism destination competitiveness: the French regions case. European Journal of Tourism Research2(1): 5.
8.
ChaabouniS (2019) China’s regional tourism efficiency: a two-stage double bootstrap data envelopment analysis. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management11: 183–191.
9.
CoelliTJRaoDSPO’DonnellCJ, et al. (2005) An Introduction to Efficiency and productivity Analysis. 2nd edition. New York: Springer.
10.
CooperWWSeifordLMToneK (2006) Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References. New York: Springer.
11.
DaraioCSimarLWilsonPW (2018) Central limit theorems for conditional efficiency measures and tests of the ‘separability’condition in non‐parametric, two‐stage models of production. The Econometrics Journal21(2): 170–191.
12.
DongHPeypochNZhangL (2020) Do contextual factors matter? Evidence from Chinese hotel productivity with heterogeneity. Tourism Economics26(2): 257–275.
13.
FørsundFR (2018) Economic interpretations of DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences61: 9–15.
14.
LewAA (1987) A framework of tourist attraction research. Annals of Tourism Research14(4): 553–575.
15.
LeiperN (1990) Tourist attraction systems. Annals of Tourism Research17(3): 367–384.
16.
NurmatovRLopezXLFMillanPPC (2021) Tourism, hospitality, and DEA: where do we come from and where do we go?International Journal of Hospitality Management95: 102883.
17.
RyanCHuiminGMengF (2009) Destination planning in China In: RyanCHuiminG (eds) Tourism in China: Destination, Cultures and Communities. New York: Routledge, 11–37.
18.
Sellers-RubioRCasado-DíazAB (2018) Analyzing hotel efficiency from a regional perspective: the role of environmental determinants. International Journal of Hospitality Management75: 75–85.
19.
SimarLWilsonPW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics136(1): 31–64.
20.
WalheerBZhangL (2018) Profit luenberger and malmquist-luenberger indexes for multi-activity decision-making units: the case of the star-rated hotel industry in China. Tourism Management69: 1–11.
21.
WalheerBZhangLLuoY (2020) Bidirectional technological spillover in the Chinese star-rated hotel sector: an empirical investigation. Economic Modelling86: 210–226.
22.
WuBYangW (2018) What do Chinese consumers want? A value framework for luxury hotels in China. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management30(4): 2037–2055.
