The disconnect between the time of use and the time of payment is sometimes blamed for the little awareness that many consumers appear to have about their usage of electricity. Real time information feedback combined with various pricing schemes has been found to reduce residential energy consumption more than information and pricing policies alone. I examine the effect of information provision with bi-monthly billing, monthly billing, and in-home displays in addition to a time-of-use pricing scheme on consumption over each month of the Irish Consumer Behavior Trial. I find that time-of-use pricing with real time usage information reduces electricity usage up to 8.7 percent during peak times at the start of the trial but the effect becomes indistinguishable from other treatment groups after the first three months. Increasing billing reports to the monthly level or a web application providing real time information may be more cost effective than in-home displays.
AllcottH.RogersT. (2014). “The Short-Run and Long-Run Effects of Behavioral Interventions?: Experimental Evidence from Energy Conservation.” American Economic Review204(10): 3003-3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003.
2.
AndersonW.WhiteV. (2009). “Exploring consumer preferences for home energy display functionality: A report for the Energy Saving Trust.” Bristol, Center for Sustainable Energy.
3.
AterI.LandsmanV. (2013). “Do Customers Learn from Experience? Evidence from Retail Banking.” Management Science59(9): 2019-2035. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1694.
4.
BaladiS.M. (1998). “Residential response to voluntary time-of-use electricity rates.” Resource and Energy Economics20(3): 225-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(97)00025-0.
5.
BrounenD.KokN.QuigleyJ.M. (2013). “Energy literacy, awareness, and conservation behaviour of residential households.” Energy Economics38: 42-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.008.
6.
CarrollJ.LyonsS.DennyE. (2014). “Reducing household electricity demand through smart metering?: The role of improved information about energy saving.” Energy Economics45: 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07. 007.
7.
ClancyM.GaffneyF. (2014). Quantifying Ireland’s Fuel and CO2 Emissions Savings from Renewable Electricity in 2012. Retrieved from http://www.seai.ie/Publications/Statistics_PublicationsZEnergy_Modelling_Group_Publications/Quantifying-Ireland%E2%80% 99s-Fuel-and-CO2-Emissions-Savings-from-Renewable-Electricity-in-2012.pdf
8.
Commission for Energy Regulation (2011). Electricity Smart Metering Customer Behaviour Trials (CBT) Findings Report (CER/11/080a). Available online: http://www.cer.ie/en/information-centre-reports-and-publications.aspx?article=5dd4bce4-ebd8-475e-b78d-da24e4ff7339
9.
DarbyS. (2006). “The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption.” A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays, Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford. Available online: http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/energy/research/
10.
DarbyS. (2010). “Smart metering: what potential for householder engagement?” Building Research and Information38(5):442-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2010.492660.
11.
DimitropoulosJ. (2007). “Appraisal of Costs and Benefits of Smart Meter Roll Out Options.” BERR. Available:http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.berr.gov.uk/files/file45997.pdf
12.
Di CosmoV.LyonsS.NolanA.(2014). “Estimating the Impact of TOU Pricing on Irish Electricity Demand.” The Energy Journal35(2): 119-138. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.2.6.
13.
Ehrhardt-MartinezK.DonnellyK.A.LaitnerJ.A. (2010). “Advanced Metering Initiatives and Feedback Programs: A Meta-Review for Household Electricity-Saving Opportunities.” American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Report No. E105
14.
“Electricity Services in Ireland,” n.d. Online. Internet. 8 Oct. 2013. Available online: http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/consumer_affairs/energy_and_water_services/electricity_services_in_ireland.html
15.
FaruquiA.HarrisD.HledikR. (2010a). “Unlocking the 53 billion Euro savings from smart meters in the EU: How increasing the adoption of dynamic tariffs could make or break the EU’s smart grid investment.” Energy Policy38(10): 6222-6231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.010.
16.
FaruquiA.SergiciS.SharifA. (2010b). “The impact of informational feedback on energy consumption- A survey of the experimental evidence.” Energy35(4): 1598-1608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.042.
17.
FaruquiA.SergiciS.AkabaL. (2014). “The Impact of Dynamic Pricing on Residential and Small Commercial and Industrial Usage: New Experimental Evidence from Connecticut.” The Energy Journal35(1): 137-160. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.1.8.
18.
FenrichS.A.GetachewL.IvanovC.SmithJ. (2014). “Demand Impact of a Critical Peak Pricing Program: Opt-in and Opt-out Options, Green Attitudes and other Customer Characteristics.” The Energy Journal35(3): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.3.1.
19.
FischerC. (2008). “Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy?” Energy Efficiency 1(1): 79-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-008-9009-7.
20.
GansW.AlberiniA.LongoA. (2013). “Smart meter devices and the effect of feedback on residential electricity consumption: Evidence from a natural experiment in Northern Ireland.” Energy Economics36: 729-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.022.
21.
GerpottT.J.PaukertM. (2013). “Determinants of willingness to pay for smart meters: An empirical analysis of household customers in Germany.” Energy Policy61: 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.012.
22.
GilbertB.Graff ZivinJ. (2014). “Dynamic salience with intermittent billing: Evidence from smart electricity meters.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization107: 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.011.
23.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2011). “Feedback on household electricity consumption: Learning and social influence processes.” International Journal of Consumer Studies35:138-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00967.x.
24.
HargreavesT.NyeM.BurgessJ. (2013). “Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact withfeedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term.” Energy Policy52: 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.027.
25.
HoudeS.ToddA.SudarshanA.FloraJ.A.ArmepK.C. (2013). “Real-time Feedback and Electricity Consumption?: A Field Experiment Assessing the Potential for Savings and Persistence.” The Energy Journal34(1): 87-103. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.1.4.
26.
lacusS.M.KingG.PorroG. (2011). “Causal inference with balance checking: coarsened exact matching.” Political Analysis15: 199-236.
27.
ItoK.IdaT.TanakaM. (2013). “Using Dynamic Electricity Pricing to Address Energy Crises: Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments.” 36th Annual NBER Summer Institute,Cambridge, MA, USA. Available: http://www.econ.kyoto-u.ac.jp/∼ida/4Hoka/smagri/20133023Ito_Ida_Tanaka_Dynamic_Pricing.pdf
28.
IvanovC.GetachewL.FenrickS.A.VittetoeB. (2013). “Enabling technologies and energy savings: The case of EnergyWise Smart Meter Pilot of Connexus Energy.” UtilitiesPolicy26: 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2012.10.001.
29.
JessoeK.RapsonD. (2014). “Knowledge is (Less) Power: Experimental Evidence from Residential Energy Use.” American Economic Review104 (4), 1417-1438. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.4.1417.
30.
JoachainH.KlopfertF. (2014). “Smarter than metering? Coupling smart meters and complementary currencies to reinforce the motivation of households for energy savings.” Ecological Economics105: 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.017.
31.
MadlenerR.RosenC.PaivarintaJ.Harmsen-Van HoutM.J.W. (2014). “Subannual Billing Information for Heating and Water Costs.” FCN Project Study on behalf of Arbeitsgemeinschaft Heiz- und Wasserkostenverteilung e.V.(Heiwako),Bonn, February.
32.
MatsukawaI. (2004). “The Effects of Information on Residential Demand for Electricity.” The Energy Journal25(1): 117. https://doi.org/10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol25-no1-1.
33.
MiraveteE.J. (2003). “Choosing the Wrong Calling Plan? Ignorance and Learning.” The American Economic Review93(1): 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455304.
34.
MorseD.L.CoulterM.P.NazarianL.F.NapodanoR.J. (1981). “Waning Effectiveness of Mailed Reminders on Reducing Broken Appointments.” Pediatrics48 (6), 846-849.
35.
NarayananS.ChintaguntaP.K.MiraveteE.J. (2007). “The role of self-selection, usage uncertainty, and learning in the demand for local telephone service.” Quantitative Marketing and Economics5 (1) 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-006-9015-z.
36.
NewshamG.R.BowkerB.G. (2010). “The effect of utility time-varying pricing and load control strategies on residential summer peak electricity use: A review.” Energy Policy38(7): 3289-3296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.027.
37.
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. (2015) “Appliance and Equipment Standards Fact Sheet.” Available: http://energy.gov/eere/buildings/downloads/appliance-and-equipment-standards-fact-sheet
38.
RichinsM.L.BlochP.H. (1986). “After the New Wears Off: The Temporal Context of Product Involvement.” Journal of Consumer Research13: 280-285.https://doi.org/10.1086/209067.
39.
RichinsM.L.BlochP.H. (1991). “Post-purchase product satisfaction: Incorporating the effects of involvement and time.” Journal of Business Research23 (2), 145-158.https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90025-S.
40.
SelwynN. (2004). “The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology.” Journal of Aging Studies18:369-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.06.008.
41.
SextonR.J.JohnsonN.B.KonankayamaA. (1987). “Consumer Response to Continuous Display Electricity Use Monitors in a TOU Pricing Experiment.” Journal of Consumer Research14:55-62.https://doi.org/10.1086/209092.
42.
StangoV.ZinmanJ.(2011). “Limited and varying consumer attention: evidence from shocks to the salience of bank overdraft fees.” NBER Working PaperNo. 17028, National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17028.
43.
Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEIA). (2013) “Energy in the Residential Sector 2013 Report.” SEAI Online. 16 Oct. 2013. Available: http://www.seai.ie/Publications/Statistics_Publications/EPSSU_Publications/Energy-in-the-Resi-dential-Sector-2013.pdf.
44.
TorritiJ. (2012). “Price-based demand side management: Assessing the impacts of TOU tariffs on residential electricity demand and peak shifting in Northern Italy.” Energy44 (1), 576-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.043.
45.
WichmanC. (2015). “Information Provision and Consumer Behavior: A Natural Experiment in Billing Frequency.” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15-35. Retrieved from http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-DP-15-35.pdf
46.
WolakF.A. (2011). “Do Residential Customers Respond to Hourly Prices? Evidence from a Dynamic Pricing Experiment.” The American Economic Review101(3): 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.10F3.83.
47.
WooC.K.HorowitzI.SulymaI.M. (2013a). “Relative kW Response to Residential Time-Varying Pricing in British Columbia.” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid4(4): 1852-1860. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2013.2256940.
48.
WooC.K.LiR.ShiuA.HorowitzI. (2013b). “Residential winter kWh responsiveness under optional time-varying pricing in British Columbia.” Applied Energy108: 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.042.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
