EnergiewendeAgora (2015). Aktionsplan Last management, Available at: http://www.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2014/aktionsplan-lastmanagement/Agora_Aktionsplan_Lastmanagement_web.pdf.
2.
EnergiewendeAgora (2014). Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 3.0. Konzept einer strukturellen EEG-Reform auf dem Weg zu einem neuen Strommarktdesign (Langfassung), Available at: http://www.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin/downloads/publikationen/Impulse/EEG_30/Agora_Energiewende_EEG_3_0_LF_web.pdf.
3.
AldyJ.E.GerardenT.D.SweeneyR.L. (2015). “Capital versus Output Subsidies: Implications of Alternative Incentives for Wind Investment”. Draft paper presented at the 21st Berkeley POWER Conference, Available at: https://ipl.econ.duke.edu/seminars/system/files/seminars/1193.pdf.
4.
AllcottH. (2012). Real-Time Pricing and Electricity Market Design. https://sites.google.com/site/allcott/home.
5.
AndorM.VossA. (2016). “Optimal renewable-energy promotion: Capacity subsidies vs. generation subsidies”. Resource and Energy Economics, 45: 144-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.06.002.
6.
BorensteinS.HollandS. (2005). “On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets with Time-Invariant Retail Prices”. The RAND Journal of Economics, 36(3): 469-493.
7.
BouteA. (2012). “Promoting renewable energy through capacity markets: An analysis of the Russian support scheme”. Energy Policy, 46: 68-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.026.
8.
BushnellJ.B. (2011). Building Blocks: Investment in Renewable and Nonrenewable Technologies. EUI RSCAS WP 2011/53, Available at: http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/19421/RSCAS_2011_53.pdf.
9.
De JongheC.HobbsB.F.BelmansR. (2014). “Value of Price Responsive Load for Wind Integration in Unit Commitment”. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29(2): 675-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2283516.
10.
De VosK. (2015). “Negative Wholesale Electricity Prices in the German, French and Belgian Day-Ahead, Intra-Day and Real-Time Markets”. The Electricity Journal, 28(4): 36-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2015.04.001.
11.
EdenhoferO. (2013). “On the economics of renewable energy sources”. Energy Economics, 40: 12-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.015.
12.
Enervis and BET (2013). Ein zukunftsfähiges Energiemarktdesign fur Deutschland, Available at: http://www.enervis.de/images/stories/enervis/pdf/publikationen/gutachten/emd_gutachten_langfassung_enervis_bet_vku_20130301.pdf.
13.
FaruquiA.SergiciS. (2010). “Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments”. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 38(2): 193-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9127-y.
14.
FellH.LinnJ. (2013). Renewable electricity policies, heterogeneity, and cost effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(3): 688-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.03.004.
15.
GambardellaC.PahleM.SchillW.-P. (2016). “Do Benefits From Dynamic Tariffing Rise? Welfare Effects of Real-Time Pricing Under Carbon-Tax-Induced Variable Renewable Energy Supply”. DIW Berlin Discussion Paper 1621.
16.
GreenR.LéautierT.O. (2015). Do costs fall faster than revenues? Dynamics of renewables entry into electricity markets. Working Paper TSE-591, Available at: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/hepg/Papers/2015/green%20and%20leautier%20paper.pdf.
17.
GreenR.VasilakosN. (2010). “Market behaviour with large amounts of intermittent generation”. Energy Policy, 38(7): 3211-3220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.038.
18.
LamontA.D. (2008). “Assessing the long-term system value of intermittent electric generation technologies”. Energy Economics, 30(3): 1208-1231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.02.007.
19.
LangC.OkwelumE. (2015). “The mitigating effect of strategic behavior on the net benefits of a direct load control program”. Energy Economics, 49: 141-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.025.
20.
LéautierT.-O. (2014). “Is Mandating “Smart Meters” Smart?” The Energy Journal, 35(4): 135-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.4.6.
21.
NewberyD.M. (2012). “Reforming Competitive Electricity Markets to Meet Environmental Targets”. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 1(1): 69-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.1.1.7.
22.
NicolosiM. (2010). “Wind power integration and power system flexibility-An empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany under the new negative price regime”. Energy Policy, 38(11): 7257-7268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.002.
23.
PahleM.SchweizerhofH. (2016). “Time for tough love: Towards gradual risk transfer to renewables in Germany”. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 5(2): 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.5.2.mpah.
24.
Perez-ArriagaI.J.BatlleC. (2012). “Impacts of Intermittent Renewables on Electricity Generation System Operation”. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 1(2): 3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.L2.1.
25.
PineauP.-O.MurtoP. (2003). “An Oligopolistic Investment Model of the Finnish Electricity Market”. Annals of Operations Research, 121: 123-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023307319633.
26.
RosnesO. (2014). “Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets”. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 46(3): 318-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-014-9258-7.
27.
SchillW.-P. (2014). “Residual load, renewable surplus generation and storage requirements in Germany”. Energy Policy, 73: 65-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.032.
28.
SchillW.-P.PahleM.GambardellaC. (forthcoming). On Start-up Costs of Thermal Power Plants in Markets with Increasing Shares of Variable Renewables. Mimeo, DIW Berlin.
29.
SchroderA. (2013). Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050. DIW Data Documentation 68., Available at: http://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.424566.de/diw_datadoc_2013-068.pdf.
30.
WolakF.A. (2011). “Do Residential Customers Respond to Hourly Prices? Evidence from a Dynamic Pricing Experiment”. American Economic Review, 101(3): 83-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.1013.83.
31.
ZerrahnA.SchillW.-P. (2015). “On the representation of demand-side management in power system models”. Energy, 84: 840-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.037.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
