In a world of uneven climate policies, concerns about carbon leakage and competitiveness for heavy industries are the main arguments against the implementation of ambitious climate policies. In this paper we investigate a potential competitiveness-driven operational carbon leakage due to the European Union Emissions Trading scheme (EU ETS). We focus on two energy-intensive sectors, cement and steel, and phases I and II of the EU ETS. From a simple analytical model, we derive an equation linking net imports of cement and steel to local and foreign demand along with carbon price. We then econometrically estimate this relation both with ARIMA regression and Prais-Winsten estimation, finding that local and foreign demand are robust drivers of trade flows. We find no significant effect of the carbon price on net imports of steel and cement. We conclude that there is no evidence of carbon leakage in these sectors, at least in the short run.
AicheleR.FelbermayrG. (2012). Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63(3):336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.10.005.
2.
AlberolaE.ChevallierJ.ChèzeB. (2008). Price drivers and structural breaks in european carbon prices 2005-2007. Energy policy, 36(2):787-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.029.
3.
AlberolaE.ChevallierJ. (2009). European carbon prices and banking restrictions: Evidence from phase i (2005-2007). SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1080159.
4.
AldyJ. E.PizerW. A. (2011). The competitiveness impacts of climate change mitigation policies. Working Paper 17705, National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
Alexeeva-TalebiV. (2011). Cost pass-through of the EU emissions allowances: Examining the european petroleum markets. Energy Economics, 33, Supplement 1:S75-S83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.07.029.
6.
BabikerM. H. (2005). Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. Journal of International Economics, 65(2):421-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.01.003.
7.
BohringerC.BalistreriE. J.RutherfordT. F. (2012). The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Overview of an energy modeling forum study (EMF 29). Energy Economics, 34:S97-S110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.10.003.
8.
BCG (2008). Assessment of the impact of the 2013-2020 ETS proposal on the european cement industry. Final project report, Boston Consulting Group.
9.
BosettiV.FrankelJ. (2011). Politically feasible emissions targets to attain 460 ppm CO2 concentrations. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(1): 86-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rer022.
10.
BrangerF.PonssardJ. P.SartorO.SatoM. (2014). Distortions from activity level thresholds in the EU-ETS. evidence from the cement sector. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resources Economists. Forthcoming.
11.
BrangerF.QuirionP. (2014a). Climate policy and the ‘carbon haven’ effect. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(1):53-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.245.
12.
BrangerF.QuirionP. (2014b). Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies. Ecological Economics, 99:29-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.010.
13.
BredinD.MuckleyC. (2011). An emerging equilibrium in the EU emissions trading scheme. Energy Economics, 33(2):353-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.06.009.
14.
BrownR. L.DurbinJ.EvansJ. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 37(2):149-192.
15.
CalelR.DechezleprêtreA. (2014). Environmental policy and directed technological change: evidence from the european carbon market. Review of Economics and Statistics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00470.
16.
Camacho-CuenaE.RequateT.WaichmanI. (2012). Investment incentives under emission trading: An experimental study. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(2):229-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9560-8.
17.
Carbon Trust (2011a). International carbon flows—aluminium. Technical report, Carbon Trust.
18.
Carbon Trust (2011b). International carbon flows—steel. Technical report, Carbon Trust.
19.
Climate Strategies (2013). Carbon control post 2020 in energy intensive industries. learning from the experience in the cement sector. energy-intensive industries project report. Technical report, Climate Strategies.
20.
CochraneD.OrcuttG. H. (1949). Application of least squares regression to relationships containing auto-correlated error terms. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(245):32.
21.
ConradC.RittlerD.RotfußW. (2012). Modeling and explaining the dynamics of european union allowance prices at high-frequency. Energy Economics, 34(1):316-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.02.011.
22.
CostantiniV.MazzantiM. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness? the impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41(1):132-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.004.
23.
CretiA.JouvetP.-A.MignonV. (2012). Carbon price drivers: Phase i versus phase II equilibrium?Energy Economics, 34(1):327-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2011.11.001.
24.
CWR (2011). Cement—primer report. Technical report, Carbon War Room.
25.
DelarueE.VoorspoolsK.D’haeseleerW. (2008). Fuel switching in the electricity sector under the EU ETS: Review and prospective. Journal of Energy Engineering, 134(2):40-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(2008)134:2(40).
26.
DemaillyD.QuirionP. (2006). CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the european cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation. Climate Policy, 6(1):93-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685590.
27.
DemaillyD.QuirionP. (2008). European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry. Energy Economics, 30(4):2009-2027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.01.020.
28.
De BruynS.MarkowskaA.de JongF.BlesM. (2010). Does the energy intensive industry obtain windfall profits through the EU ETS? an econometric analysis for products from the refineries, iron and steel and chemical sectors. Technical report, CE Delft.
29.
Ecorys (2008). Study on the competitiveness of the european steel sector. Technical report, Ecorys.
30.
EderingtonJ.LevinsonA.MinierJ. (2005). Footloose and pollution-free. Working Paper 9718, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0034653053327658.
31.
EllermanA. D.BuchnerB. K. (2008). Over-allocation or abatement? a preliminary analysis of the EU ETS based on the 2005-06 emissions data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(2):267-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9191-2.
32.
EllermanD.ConveryF.de PerthuisC. (2010). Pricing Carbon: The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Cambridge, UK, cambridge university press edition.
33.
EskelandG. S.HarrisonA. E. (2003). Moving to greener pastures? multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70(1):1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00084-6.
34.
European Commission (2012). The state of the european carbon market in 2012. Technical Report C0M(2012) 652, European Commission.
35.
GerlaghR.KuikO. (2014). Spill or leak? carbon leakage with international technology spillovers: A CGE analysis. Energy Economics, 45:381-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.017.
36.
GerlaghR.MathysN. (2011). Energy abundance, trade and industry location. Nota di Lavoro 03-11, FEEM. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1756688.
37.
GoereeJ. K.PalmerK.HoltC. A.ShobeW.BurtrawD. (2010). An experimental study of auctions versus grandfathering to assign pollution permits. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(2-3):514-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2010.tb00522.x.
38.
GoulderL. H.HafsteadM. A. C.DworskyM. (2010). Impacts of alternative emissions allowance allocation methods under a federal cap-and-trade program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(3):161-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.06.002.
39.
GrimmV.IlievaL. (2013). An experiment on emissions trading: the effect of different allocation mechanisms. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 44(3):308-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-013-9222-y.
40.
GrossmanG.KruegerA. (1993). Environmental impact of a north american free trade agreement. In The Mexico US Free Trade Agreement. Cambridge, Massachussets, MIT press edition.
41.
HintermannB. (2010). Allowance price drivers in the first phase of the EU ETS. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 59(1):43-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.07.002.
42.
HolmesP.ReillyT.RolloJ. (2011). Border carbon adjustments and the potential for protectionism. Climate Policy, 11(2):883-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2009.0071.
43.
HoltzC. (2013). Monthly industrial output in china since 1983. Munich Personal Repec Archive 43867.
44.
HoodC. (2010). Reviewing existing and proposed emissions trading systems. IEA information paper, IEA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km4hv3mlg5c-en.
45.
HourcadeJ.-C.DemaillyD.NeuhoffK.SatoM. (2007). Differentiation and dynamics of EU ETS competitiveness impacts. Technical report, Climate Strategies, Cambridge, UK.
46.
ICR (2012). Global cement report. Technical report, International Cement Review.
47.
IEA (2009). Cement technology roadmap 2009. Technical report, International Energy Agency.
48.
JaffeA. B.PetersonS. R.PortneyP. R.StavinsR. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1):132-163.
49.
JuergensI.Barreiro-HurléJ.VasaA. (2013). Identifying carbon leakage sectors in the EU ETS and implications of results. Climate Policy, 13(1):89-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.649590.
50.
KaltJ. (1988). The impact of domestic environmental regulatory policies on U.S. international competitiveness. In International Competitiveness. Ballinger Publishing Company.
51.
KolevG. I. (2011). The “spurious regression problem” in the classical regression model framework. Economics Bulletin, 31(1):925-937.
52.
KuikO.BrangerF.QuirionP. (2013). International competitiveness and markets. the current policy mix. Technical report, Report for the EU FP7 Cecilia2050 project (Task 2.8).
53.
LacombeR. (2008). Economic impact of the european union emissions trading system : Evidence from the refining sector. MIT master thesis.
54.
LevinsonA.TaylorM. S. (2008). Unmasking the pollution haven effect*. International Economic Review, 49(1):223-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00478.x.
55.
Mansanet-BatallerM.ChevallierJ.Hervé-MignucciM.AlberolaE. (2011). EUA and sCER phase II price drivers: Unveiling the reasons for the existence of the EUA-sCER spread. Energy Policy, 39(3):1056-1069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.047.
56.
Martínez-RiveraB.Ventosa-SantaulariaD. (2012). A comment on ‘is the spurious regression problem spurious?’. Economics Letters, 115(2):229-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.12.044.
57.
MartinR.MuulsM.de PreuxL.WagnerU. (2014). On the empirical content of carbon leakage criteria in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Ecological Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.010.
58.
McCallumB. T. (2010). Is the spurious regression problem spurious?Economics Letters, 107(3):321-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.004.
59.
MiltnerA.SalmonsR. (2009). Trends in the competitiveness of selected industrial sectors in ETR countries. In Carbon-energy Taxation: Lessons from Europe. New York, oxford university press edition.
60.
MontgomeryW. (1972). Markets in licences and efficient pollution control programs. Journal of Economic Theory, pages 385-418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90049-X.
61.
OikonomouV.PatelM.WorrellE. (2006). Climate policy: Bucket or drainer?Energy Policy, 34(18):3656-3668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.012.
62.
PonssardJ.-P.WalkerN. (2008). EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis. Climate Policy, 8(5):467-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0500.
63.
PorterM. E.Van der LindeC. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4):97-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97.
64.
QuirionP. (2009). Historic versus output-based allocation of GHG tradable allowances: a comparison. Climate Policy, 9(6):575-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2008.0618.
65.
QuirionP. (2011). Les quotas échangeables d’émission de gaz àeffet de serre: éléments d’analyse économique. Technical report, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales (EHESS).
66.
RaynerS. (2010). How to eat an elephant: a bottom-up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy, 10(6):615-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0138.
67.
ReinaudJ. (2008a). Climate policy and carbon leakage. impacts of the european emissions trading scheme on aluminium. IEA information paper, IEA.
68.
ReinaudJ. (2008b). Issues behind competitiveness and carbon leakage. focus on heavy industry. IEA information paper, International Energy Agency, OECD/IEA Paris.
69.
SartorO. (2013). Carbon leakage in the primary aluminium sector: What evidence after 6.5 years of the EU ETS? SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2205516, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
70.
SchumacherK.SandsR. D. (2007). Where are the industrial technologies in energy-economy models? an innovative CGE approach for steel production in Germany. Energy Economics, 29(4):799-825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.12.007.
71.
SelimT.SalemA. (2010). Global cement industry: Competitive and institutional dimensions. Technical Report 24464.
72.
SijmJ.NeuhoffK.ChenY. (2006). CO2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1):49-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588.
73.
SmarzynskaB. K. (2002). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms : in search of spillovers through backward linkages. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2923, The World Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2923.
TobeyJ. A. (1990). The effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of world trade: An empirical test. Kyklos, 43(2):191-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1990.tb00207.x.
76.
TrotignonR. (2012). In search of the carbon price. PhD thesis. Paris Dauphine University, October.
77.
Ventosa-SantaulariaD. (2012). Unbalanced regressions and spurious inference. Open Journal of Statistics, 02(03):297-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2012.23035.
78.
WCA (2011). Coal and steel facts 2011. Technical report, World Coal Association.
79.
World Bank & Ecofys (2013). Mapping carbon pricing initiatives. Technical report, Ecofys and World Bank.
80.
WråkeM.MyersE.BurtrawD.MandellS.HoltC. (2010). Opportunity cost for free allocations of emissions permits: An experimental analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(3):331-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9343-z.
81.
WSA (2012). World steel in figures 2012. Technical Report ISSN 1379-9746, World Steel Association.
82.
ZachmanG.AbrellJ.Ndoye FayeA. (2011). Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data. Technical Report 2011/08.
83.
ZhangL. (2013). Partial unit root and linear spurious regression: A monte carlo simulation study. Economics Letters, 118(1):189-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.10.018.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
