Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

I analyze renewable electricity policy in a multinational electricity market with transmission investment. If national policy makers choose support schemes to maximize domestic welfare, a trade policy motive arises operating independently of any direct benefit of renewable electricity. The model predicts electricity importing (exporting) countries to choose policies which reduce (increase) electricity prices. A narrow pursuit of domestic objectives distorts transmission investment, and thereby market integration, below the efficient level. Distortions cannot be corrected by imposing national renewable targets alone. Instead, subsidies to transmission investment and a harmonization of and reduction in the number of policy instruments can improve welfare.

Keywords

Market integration Renewable electricity Trade policy Transmission investment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACER/CEER (2013). “Annual Report on the Results of Monitoring the Internal Electricity and Natural Gas Markets in 2012.” Document available online at: www.acer.europa.eu/Official_documents/Publications/Pages/Publication.aspx.

Amundsen

E.S.

Bergman

(2012). “Green Certificates and Market Power on the Nordic Power Market.” The Energy Journal 33(2): 101-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.2.5.

Amundsen

E.S.

Mortensen

J.B.

(2001). “The Danish Green Certificate System: Some Simple Analytical Results.” Energy Tconomics 23(5): 489-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(01)00079-2.

Borenstein

Bushnell

J.B.

Wolak

F.A.

(2002). “Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market.” American Tconomic Review 92(5): 1376-1405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024557.

Bohringer

Rosendahl

K.E.

(2010). “Green Promotes the Dirtiest: On the Interaction Between Black and Green Quotas in Energy Markets.” Journal of Regulatory Tconomics 37(3): 316-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11149-010-9116-1.

Copeland

B.R.

(1990). “Strategic Interaction among Nations: Negotiable and Non-Negotiable Trade Barriers.” Canadian Journal of Tconomics 23(1): 84-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/135521.

European Commission (1997). “Energy for the Future: Renewable Sources of Energy.” White Paper COM(97)599 final. Document available online at: europa.eu/documents/comm/white_papers/pdf/com97_599_en.pdf.

Fischer

(2010). “Renewable Portfolio Standards: When Do They Lower Energy Prices?” The Energy Journal 31(1): 101-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-No1-5.

Fischer

Newell

R.G.

(2008). “Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation.” Journal of Environmental Tconomics and Management 55(2): 142-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001.

10.

Fischer

Preonas

(2010). “Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of Its Parts?” International Review of Environmental and Resource Tconomics 4(1): 51-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/101.00000030.

11.

Holmberg

Philpott

A.B.

(2012). “Supply Function Equilibria in Networks with Transport Constraints.” IFN Working Paper 945.

12.

Horn

Lang

Lundgren

(1994). “International Integration of Oligopolistic Markets with Interrelated Demands.” Unpublished Manuscript, IFN.

13.

Jenner

Chan

Frankenberger

Gabel

(2012). “What Drives States to Support Renewable Energy?” The Energy Journal 33(2): 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.33.2.1.

14.

Jensen

S.G.

Skytte

(2002). “Interactions between the Power and Green Certificate Markets.” Energy Policy 30(5): 425-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00111-2.

15.

Morthorst

PE.

(2003). “A Green Certificate Market Combined with a Liberalised Power Market.” Energy Policy 31(13): 1393-1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00198-2.

16.

Ogawa

Wildasin

(2009). “Think Locally, Act Locally: Spillovers, Spillbacks, and Efficient Decentralized Policymaking.” American Tconomic Review 99(4): 1206-1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.99A1206.

17.

del Rfo, P. (2005). “A European-Wide Harmonised Tradable Green Certificate Scheme for Renewable Electricity: Is it Really So Beneficial?” Energy Policy 33(10): 1239-1250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.11.019.

18.

Schmalensee

(2012). “Evaluating Policies to Increase the Generation of Electricity from Renewable Energy.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 6(1): 45-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/reep/rer020.

19.

Soderholm

(2008). “The Political Economy of International Green Certificate Markets.” Energy Policy 36(6): 20512062. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.023.

20.

Tangeras

T.P.

(2014). “Renewable Electricity Policy and Market Integration: Additional Proofs.” Document available online at www.ifn.se/thomast.

21.

Traber

Kemfert

(2009). “Impacts of the German Support for Renewable Energy on Electricity Prices, Emissions, and Firms.” The Energy Journal 30(3): 155-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No3-8.

22.

Unger

Ahlgren

E.O.

(2005). “Impacts of a Common Green Certificate Market on Electricity and CO2-Emission Markets in the Nordic Countries.” Energy Policy 33(16): 2152-2163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.013.

23.

Wolfram

C.D.

(1999). “Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market.” American Economic Review 89(4): 805-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.4.805.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB