We propose nuclear capacity auctions as a means to correcting the incentives for investing in nuclear power. In particular, capacity auctions open the market for large-scale entry by outside firms. Requiring licensees to sell a share of capacity as virtual power plant contracts increases auction efficiency by mitigating incumbent producers’ incentive to bid for market power. A motivating example is Sweden’s policy reversal to allow new nuclear power to replace old reactors.
AusubelL.M.CramtonP. (2010b). “Virtual Power Plant Auctions.” UtilitiesPolicy, 18(4): 201-206. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2010.05.002.
4.
BorensteinS.BushnellJ.B.WolakF.A. (2002). “Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California’s Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market.” American Economic Review, 92(5): 1376-1405. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024557.
5.
DavisL.W. (2012). “Prospects for Nuclear Power.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1): 49-66. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.1.49.
6.
DavisL.W.WolframC. (2012): Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from U.S. Nuclear Power.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4): 194-225.
7.
DuY.ParsonsJ.E. (2009). “Update on the Cost of Nuclear Power.” CEEPR Working Paper 09-004.
8.
EME Analys (2007). “Varfor ar svenskar mycket samre an finnar pa att kora karnkraftverk?” Document available online at: www.elbruk.se/k_kraft_PM_30_nov.pdf.
9.
GrublerA. (2010). “The Costs of the French Nuclear Scale-up: A Case of Negative Learning by Doing.” Energy Policy, 38(9): 5174-5188. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.003.
10.
HausmanC. (2014). “Corporate Incentives and Nuclear Safety.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3): 178-206.
11.
HimpensP.MorbeeJ.ProostS. (2011). “Taxation of Nuclear Rents: Benefits, Drawbacks and Alternatives.” Center for Economics Studies DPS 11.16, KU Leuven.
12.
JehielP.MoldovanuB.StacchettiE. (1996). “How (Not) to Sell Nuclear Weapons.” American Economic Review, 86(4): 814-829.
13.
JoskowPL.ParsonsJ. (2012). “The Future of Nuclear Power After Fukushima.” Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 1(2): 99-113. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.1.2.7.
14.
KlempererP. (2004). Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
MilgromP. (2004). Putting Auction Theory to Work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813825.
16.
MIT (2003). “The Future of Nuclear Power—An Interdisciplinary MIT Study.” Document available online at: http://web.mit.edu/nuclearpower.
17.
MorenoR.BarrosoL.A.RudnickH.MocarquerS.BezerraB. (2010). “Auction Approaches of Long-term Contracts to Ensure Generation Investment in Electricity Markets: Lessons from the Brazilian and Chilean Experiences.” Energy Policy, 38(10): 5758-5769. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.026.
Nutek (1991). “Elmarknad i forandring—Fran monopol till konkurrens.” B 1991:6
20.
WolframC.D. (1999). “Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market.” American Economic Review, 89(4): 805-826. http:-//dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.4.805.
