Nuclear power uprates are investments in generation capacity that enable reactors to operate beyond their original power limit. We find that owners of deregulated reactors are more likely to make investment in power uprates. Moreover, after deregulation owners of boiling water reactors are more likely to choose Extended Power Uprates (EPUs) that could add up to 20 percent of the original power, but owners of pressurized water reactors, another type of reactors for which EPUs are more technically challenging, tend to select other types of uprates that add -less of reactor power. Deregulation incentivizes reactor owners to pursue profitable investments and propels them to make careful investment decisions more consistent with the technological nature of their plants.
AghionPhilippeHarrisChristopherHarrisPeterVickersJohn (2001). “Competition, Imitation, and Growth with Step- by-Step Innovation.” Review of Economic Studies68(3): 467-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00177.
2.
AlesinaAlbertoArdagnaSilviaNicolettiGiuseppeSchiantarelliFabio (2005). “Regulation and Investment.” Journal of European Economic Association3(4): 791-825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/1542476054430834.
3.
AtkinsonS.E.HalvorsonRobert (1980). “A Test of Relative and Absolute Efficiency in Regulated Utilities.” Review of Economics and Statistics62(1): 81-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1924275.
4.
HarveyAverchJohnsonLeland L. (1962). “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review52 (5): 1052-1069.
5.
BeckerAnn Day (2010, August). “Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Power Uprate.” Power Engineering114(8): 36-40.
6.
BorensteinSeverinBushnellJames (2000). “Electricity Restructuring: Deregulation or Reregulation?” Regulation23 (2): 46-52.
7.
BushnellJames B.WolframCatherine (2005). “Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants.” (CSEM Working Paper No.140). Retrieved from University of California eScholarship website: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8dv5c0t1
8.
CohenWesley M.LevinRichard (1989). “Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure.” In SchmalenseeRichardWilligRobert (Eds) Handbook of Industrial Organization Vol. 2, 1059 - 1107.
9.
CraigJ. DeanSavageScott J. (2013). “Market Restructuring, Competition and the Efficiency of Electric Generation: Plant-Level Evidence from the United States 1996 to 2006.” The Energy Journal34(1): 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547/01956574.34.1.1.
10.
CramtonPeterOckenfelsAxel (2011). “Economics and Design of Capacity Markets for the Power Sector.” Retrieved from Peter Cramton, University of Maryland website: http://www.cramton.umd.edu/papers2010-2014/cramton-ocken-fels-economics-and-design-of-capacity-markets.pdf
11.
DavisLucas W.WolframCatherine (2012). “Deregulation, Consolidation, and Efficiency: Evidence from U.S. Nuclear Power.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics4(4): 194-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.194.
FabrizioKira R. (2012). “The Effect of Regulatory Uncertainty on Investment: Evidence from Renewable Energy Generation.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization29(4): 765-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ews007.
14.
FabrizioKira R.RoseNancy L.WolframCatherine D. (2007). “Do Markets Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on U.S. Electric Generation Efficiency.” American Economic Review97(4): 1250-1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1250.
15.
FineJ. P.GrayR. J. (1999). “A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk.” Journal of the American Statistical Association94: 496-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144.
16.
FowlieMeredith. (2010). “Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Control.” American Economic Review100 (3): 837-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.837.
17.
GeraldGrandersonLinvillCarl (2002). “Regulation, Efficiency and Granger Causality.” International Journal of Industrial Organization20(9): 1225-1245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00094-7/
HansenTeresa (2007, March). “Nuclear Plant Uprates.” Power Engineering, 111(3): 33.
21.
HausmanCatherine (2014). “Corporate Incentives and Nuclear Safety.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy6 (3): 178-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/pol.63.178.
22.
HoltLynneSotkiewiczPaulBergSanford (2008). “(When) to Build or Not to Build?: The Role of Uncertainty in Nuclear Power Expansion.” Texas Journal of Oil, Gas, and Energy Law3(2): 174-214.
23.
HoltLynneSotkiewiczPaulBergSanford (2010). “Nuclear power expansion: Thinking about uncertainty.” Electricity Journal23(5): 26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2010.04.013.
24.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2004). “Implications of Power Uprates on Safety Margins of Nuclear Power Plants.” (IAEA-TECDOC-1418). Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
25.
International Atomic Energy Agency (2011). “Power Uprate in Nuclear Power Plants: Guidelines and Experience.” (No.NP- T-3.9). Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
26.
IshiiJun &Jingming Yan (2011). “Investmentunder Regulatory Uncertainty: U.S. Electricity Generation Investment 19962000.” (Mimeo). https://www3.amherst.edu/∼jishii/files/regrisk_2011b.pdf
27.
JoskowPaul L. (1997). “Restructuring, Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector.” Journal of Economic Perspectives11(3): 119-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.3.119.
28.
JoskowPaul L (2006, April). “Competitive Electricity Markets and Investment in New Generating Capacity.” (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research No. 06-009).
29.
JoskowPaul L.KahnEdward (2002). “A Quantitative Analysis of Pricing Behavior in California’s WholesaleElectricity Market During Summer 2000.” The Energy Journal23(4): 1-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.5547ZISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol23-No4-1.
30.
JoskowPeter L.RoseNancy L. (1989). “The Effects of Economic Regulation.” In SchmalenseeRichardWilligRobert (Eds) Handbook of Industrial OrganizationVol. 2, pp. 1449-1506.
31.
KangKi Sig (2008). “Power Uprates in Nuclear Power Plants: International Experiences and Approaches for Implementation.” Nuclear Engineering and Technology40(4): 255-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.5516/NET.2008.40.4.255.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2003). “The Future of Nuclear Power: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study.” MIT Energy Initiative.
34.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2007). “The Future of Coal: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study.” MITEnergy Initiative.
35.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2009). “Update of the MIT 2003 Future of Nuclear Power.” MIT Energy Initiative.
36.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011). “The Future of Natural Gas: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study.” MIT Energy Initiative.
37.
Nuclear Engineering International (2009, April). “The big swap-out.” Nuclear Engineering International54(657): 14-17.
38.
Nuclear Engineering International (2010, June). “When is a BWR like a Coca-Cola bottle?” Nuclear Engineering International55(671): 46.
39.
North American Electric Reliability Council (1996). “Reliability Assessment 1996 - 2005.”
40.
North American Electric Reliability Corporation. (2007). “2007 Long-term Reliability Assessment 2007 - 2016.” Retrieved from NERC website:
41.
RosnerRobertGoldbergStephen (2011). “Small Modular Reactors - Key to Future Nuclear Power Generation in the U.S.” The Energy Policy Institute at Chicago, The Harris School of Public Policy Studies, The University of Chicago.
42.
SchimmollerBrian K. (2000, June). “Retrofits Keep Pace with New Generation.” Power Engineering104(6): 37.
43.
ThomasEugene W. (2009). “Nuclear Uprates Add Critical Capacity.” Power153(5): 76.
44.
U.S. Department of Energy. 2006. “Advanced Power Ultra-Uprates of Existing Plants (APUU).” U. S. Department of Energy Final Scientific/Technical Report #STD-TFNE-06-10.
45.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (1998). “Challenges of Electric Power Industry Restructuring for Fuel Supplies.” (DOE/EIA-0623).
46.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (2003). “Nuclear Power: 12 percent of America Generating Capacity, 20 percent of the Electricity.”
47.
U.S. NRC (1992, September 9). “Fermi-2 - Amendment No. 87 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-43 (TAC No. M82102).” (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML020720520).
48.
U.S. NRC (1998, July 24). “General Electric Nuclear Energy Extended Power Uprate Program and Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Power Level Increase Request.” (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML091210301).
49.
U.S. NRC (1999, September 30). “Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), Units 1 And 2 Issuance of Amendments RE: Increase in CPSES, Unit 2 Thermal Power to 3445 Megawatts Thermal (TAC NOs. MA4436 and MA4437).” (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML021820306).
50.
University of Chicago (2004). “The Economic Future of Nuclear Power - A Study Conducted at The University of Chicago.”
Kenneth ChuckWade (1995). “Steam Generator Degradation and Its Impact on Continued Operation of Pressurized Water Reactors in the United States” Energy Information Administration/Electric Power MonthlyAugust1995.
53.
WhiteMatthewJoskowPaul L.HausmanJerry (1996). “Power Struggles: Explaining Deregulatory Reforms in Electricity Markets.” Brookings Papers on Microeconomics 201-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2534749.
54.
WolframCatherine (1999). “Measuring Duopoly Power in the British Electricity Spot Market.” American Economic Review89(4): 805-826.
55.
WolframCatherine (2004). “The Efficiency of Electricity Generation in the U.S. After Restructuring.” In GriffinJamesPullerSteve (Eds), Electricity Deregulation: Choices and Challenges. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.4.805.
56.
World Nuclear Association (2005). “The New Economics of Nuclear Power.”
57.
YoungGarryAbneyTim (2003, November). “Coming of Age.” Nuclear Engineering International48(592): 32.
58.
ZhangFan (2007) “Does Electricity Restructuring Work? Evidence from the U.S. Nuclear Energy Industry.” The Journal of Industrial Economics55(3): 397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6451.2007.00317.x.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
